Return To: Session CDP - Plasma Heating and Current Drive
Prev Page: (CDP/09) ICRF Heating and Profile Control Techniques in
Next Page: (CDP/12) High Frequency Fast Wave Results from the

(CDP/11) Comparing High Power Ion Cyclotron Resonance Frequency Heating with Neutral Injection in ASDEX Upgrade: Differences, Similarities and Synergies

   
J.-M. Noterdaeme , D. A. Hartmann , A. Stäbler , M. Brambilla , B. Bruesehaber , J. C. Fuchs , J. Gafert , A. Gude , B. Kurzan , M. Maraschek , R. Neu , F. Ryter , F. Serra ^*, J. Stober , W. Suttrop , S. Vergamota ^*, H.-P. Zehrfeld  and ASDEX Upgrade Team 
 
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association, D-85748 Garching, Germany
^* Centro de Fusao Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, EURATOM Association, P-1096 Lisboa Codex, Portugal

Abstract
By using 3 dB couplers, ICRF heating has become much less sensitive to changes in coupling. High power regimes with strong ELMs  could thus be investigated. Comparison with NI then allows effects specific to the heating schemes to be investigated. Large differences were observed on the central plasma, in particular on the sawteeth . With ICRF heating, the central electron temperature is higher and the sawtooth amplitude larger than with NI. No difference was seen on the ELM behaviour (frequency, effect on edge $\rm T_e$) between NI and ICRF. The combination of NI and ICRF results in stabilization of the 3,2 neoclassical mode, under conditions where it is unstable with NI alone.

     

Read the full paper in PDF format.