ROMANIA
(Updated 2019)
PREAMBLE
This report provides information on the status and development of nuclear power programmes in Romania, including factors related to the effective planning, decision making and implementation of the nuclear power programme that together lead to safe and economical operation of nuclear power plants.
The CNPP summarizes organizational and industrial aspects of nuclear power programmes and provides information about the relevant legislative, regulatory and international framework in Romania.
Romania has two power units in operation, supplying approximately 17% of Romania’s total electricity production, and is planning expansion of its nuclear power programme.
1. COUNTRY ENERGY OVERVIEW
1.1. ENERGY INFORMATION
1.1.1. Energy policy
The energy sector contributes to the development of Romania, having a significant influence on the economy, quality of life and the environment. In order to sustain consumer expectations for the long term, Romania’s energy sector must become more robust economically, more advanced technically and overall less polluting.
Romania’s energy policy is harmonized with European policies and focuses on three pillars of European policy: ensuring energy security, competitiveness and sustainability. Achieving these goals requires the transformation of the energy system by developing the necessary infrastructure, which is the substance of a new national strategic project.
In the context of European energy and climate change policies that have been in place since 2007, Romanian energy policy must account for the energy and environmental objectives adopted by the European Council for 2030, as well as the initiatives launched by the European Commission to set up the Energy Union and promote the Clean Energy Package. Within this context, European energy and climate change policies will affect the development of a new energy strategy for Romania that will fit in the context of the agreed objectives at the European level:
A mandatory EU-level target of at least 40% reduction of domestic greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990;
An EU-wide target of 27% renewable energy consumption by 2030;
An indicative EU target of 27% improvement in energy efficiency by 2030;
The completion of an internal energy market by meeting the goal of a 15% interconnection target by 2030.
The draft Energy Strategy of Romania 2019–2030, with the Perspective of 2050 was launched for public debate in March 2019, taking into account economic competitiveness, in addition to the accessibility of the consumers and the participation of Romania to achieve European decarbonization targets, according to national objectives.
The draft strategy outlines five fundamental objectives:
Ensuring energy security;
Creating a competitive energy market, strongly integrated into regional markets and the European single market;
Promoting clean energy — bolstering clean, low carbon energy sources in line with European policy and the provisions of the Paris Agreement;
Modernizing the energy governance system;
Reducing energy poverty and protecting consumers.
Romania seeks to maintain a balanced energy mix that ensures energy security and balances energy independence provided by the efficient use of national resources and interconnectivity with neighbouring countries in the region as an alternative, including in critical situations. It is intended to keep traditional fuels — oil, natural gas, coal and uranium — as a part of the energy mix over the upcoming decades, in parallel with the increasing contribution of renewable resources. In light of these considerations, the main directions of action of the energy policy are:
Continuing infrastructure development and natural gas supply;
Increasing the flexibility of the national energy system through digitization, smart networks and by developing the category of active consumers;
Developing high efficiency cogeneration, in parallel with the modernization of district heating systems;
Increasing the energy efficiency of homes to mitigate energy poverty;
Reducing the level of energy poverty and protecting consumers.
Source: Energy Strategy of Romania 2019–2030, with the Perspective of 2050.
1.1.2. Estimated available energy
TABLE 1. ESTIMATED AVAILABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Fossil fuels | Nuclear | Renewables | ||||
Solid | Liquid | Gas | Uranium | Hydro | Other renewable |
|
Total amount in specific units* | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total amount in exajoules (EJ) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
*Solid, liquid: Million tonnes; gas: billion m3; uranium: metric tonnes; hydro, renewable: TW.
—: data not available.
1.1.3. Energy statistics
Table 2 shows energy statistics for Romania.
TABLE 2. ENERGY STATISTICS
2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2017* | Compound annual growth rate (%) 2000 to 2017* |
|
Energy consumption [EJ]** | |||||
- Total | 1.523 | 1.458 | 1.333 | 1.398 | (0.005 |
- Solids*** | 0.313 | 0.289 | 0.245 | 0.246 | (0.014 |
- Liquids | 0.411 | 0.352 | 0.360 | 0.399 | (0.002 |
- Gases | 0.573 | 0.456 | 0.377 | 0.407 | (0.020 |
- Nuclear | 0.056 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.046 |
- Hydro + wind + photovoltaic | 0.051 | 0.066 | 0.070 | 0.076 | 0.024 |
- Other/Renewables | 0.120 | 0.175 | 0.175 | 0.172 | 0.022 |
Energy production [EJ] | |||||
- Total | 1.177 | 1.148 | 1.105 | 1.064 | (0.006 |
- Solids*** | 0.235 | 0.247 | 0.197 | 0.187 | (0.013 |
- Liquids | 0.258 | 0.175 | 0.164 | 0.149 | (0.032 |
- Gases | 0.459 | 0.364 | 0.372 | 0.360 | (0.014 |
- Nuclear | 0.056 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.045 |
- Hydro + wind + photovoltaic | 0.053 | 0.074 | 0.094 | 0.087 | 0.029 |
- Other/Renewables | 0.116 | 0.168 | 0.159 | 0.163 | 0.020 |
*Latest available data.
**Energy consumption = Primary energy consumption + Net import (Import - Export) of secondary energy.
***Solid fuels include coal, lignite.
—: data not available.
Source: http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/index.jsp?page=tempo3&lang=ro&ind=IND108A.
1.2. THE ELECTRICITY SYSTEM
1.2.1. Electricity system and decision making process
The National Power System (NPS) represents all the power plants involved in the production, transport, distribution and operation of electricity. NPS operations depend on the situation of these installations and on issues related to energy resources, market elements and the requirements of regulations in the field. Currently, Romania has a balanced and diversified energy mix, owing to the existence and capitalization of its energy resources, which makes the national energy sector competitive at the regional level.
Coal is a basic component of the energy mix, serving as a pillar of national energy security.The power plants are the first energy units built into the system, yet much of these generating capabilities are older than 30 years. At present, the plan for these energy units is subject to domestic programmes to upgrade, modernize and realize environmental investments, according to greater European requirements. The biggest problems faced by coal units are mainly related to adaptation to environmental requirements and to the increasing price of CO2, which implicitly leads to an increase in the price of energy produced and a decrease in the competitiveness of these units in the energy market.
In extreme weather, both in summer and winter, coal fired power plants cover about one third of the electricity demand when other energy sources become unavailable. Natural gas has a share of about 30% of domestic primary energy consumption. Hydropower plants contribute between 15 and 20% of electricity production, depending on the availability of resources. The renewal of the hydrocarbon capacities has a significant upward trend towards capabilities in the coal sector. The new technologies of these units, with quick start and combined cycle (steam/gas), give them an important role in balancing NPS.
Nuclear power, a low carbon energy source currently accounting for a significant share of total national electricity production (about 18%), is a core component of Romania’s energy mix, supported by an internal infrastructure covering the open nuclear fuel cycle, which allows the country to have a high degree of independence in the production of nuclear energy.
Romania has rich and varied renewable energy resources as well, including: biomass, hydropower, geothermal potential, wind, solar and photovoltaic energy. Development potential in the biomass sector is still high, especially through efficiency and the introduction of new technologies, such as biorefineries and biogas production capacities. Judicious management of the forest fund is a basic condition for the use of wood to produce energy. Geothermal resources are only marginally exploited in Romania, but there is a potential for increasing the use of these resources in the coming decades.
1.2.2. Structure of electric power sector
The transmission and system operator, Transelectrica SA, coordinates the power flows of the NPS by controlling dispatchable production units. The dispatchable units are those which can be switched on, off, or adjusted in terms of power. Although dispatching involves additional costs for manufacturers, it makes it possible to balance NPS in extreme situations. Of the total gross power available of nearly 20 000 MW, only 3000 MW are non-dispatchable.
In Romania, the distribution of electricity is a regulated activity being carried out by eight distribution operators to which the state has leased the power distribution service. In this sector, sustained investment is required to achieve a high level of performance, in line with consumer expectations as well as balancing the degree of supportability. Electricity distribution operators attach great importance to investments in upgrading and developing maintenance networks and operations, which aim to improve the quality of other sectors including consumer services and food security.
1.2.3. Main indicators
Table 3 contains information on installed capacity, electricity production and consumption.
TABLE 3. INSTALLED CAPACITY, ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2017* | Compound annual growth rate (%) 2000 to 2017 |
||
Capacity of electrical plants (GWe) | G/N | |||||
- Thermal | N | 15 | 12 | 10.9 | 10.8 | (0.0191 |
- Nuclear | N | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.0416 |
- Hydro | N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 0.0091 |
- Wind | N | 0.4 | 4.5 | 4.4 | — | |
- Geothermal | N | |||||
- Other/Renewables | N | |||||
- Total | N | 21.7 | 19.8 | 23.8 | 23.6 | 0.0049 |
Electricity production (TWh) | G/N | |||||
- Thermal | G | 32 | 29 | 28.7 | 28.6 | (0.0066 |
- Nuclear | G | 5 | 12 | 11.7 | 11.5 | 0.0502 |
- Hydro | G | 15 | 20 | 17 | 14.9 | (0.0004 |
- Wind | G | 0.3 | 9 | 9.3 | 0.2238 | |
- Geothermal | G | |||||
- Other renewable | G | |||||
- Total** | G | 52 | 61.3 | 66.3 | 0.0126 | |
Total electricity consumption (TWh) | 43 | 52 | 52 | 54 | 0.0135 |
*Latest available data.
**Electricity transmission losses are not deducted.
—: data not available.
Source: http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/index.jsp?page=tempo3&lang=ro&ind=IND108A.
TABLE 4. ENERGY RELATED RATIOS
Some of the following information should be available in PRIS.
2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2017* | |
Electricity consumption per capita (kWh/capita) | 1917 | 2581 | 2624 | 2756 |
Electricity production/Energy production (%) | 16 | 19 | 19 | 22 |
Nuclear/total electricity (%) | 10 | 19 | 18 | 18 |
*Latest available data.
Source: http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/index.jsp?page=tempo3&lang=ro&ind=IND108A.
2. NUCLEAR POWER SITUATION
2.1. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
2.1.1. Overview
Dates of reference in the Romanian nuclear energy field:
1968 — Launch of the Nuclear National Programme.
1970 — Inauguration of the Heavy Water Pilot and Nuclear Power Plants and Facilities Design Division.
1971 — Founding of the Institute for Nuclear Technologies as a technological support for the nuclear power programme in Romania.
1976 — Completion of the Romanian–Canadian feasibility study for the CANDU system in Romania.
December 1978 — Contracts between ROMENERGO and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) for the takeover of the CANDU system licence and for design and procurement of the nuclear equipment for Unit 1 are concluded.
February1981 — Contracts between ROMENERGO–Ansaldo (Italy) and General Electric (United States of America) for the conventional part (BOP) of Unit 1 are concluded.
1982 — First containment concrete is poured (reactor building base slab).
December 1985 — Delivery on-site and installation of the calandria vessel for the Cernavoda NPP Unit 1.
1989 — Installation of the fuel channels at the Cernavoda NPP Unit 1.
December 1989 — Romanian revolution; the Cernavoda NPP Unit 1 is 45% complete.
July 1990 — The first Pre-Operational Safety Review Team (Pre-OSART) mission of the IAEA to the Cernavoda NPP, which leads to the recommendation of creating a management team with international experience in nuclear power projects.
August 1991 — The management contract with AECL–Ansaldo Consortium (AAC) is concluded.
May–June 1995 — The fuel loading of Cernavoda NPP Unit 1.
16 April 1996 — The first criticality of the Unit 1 reactor.
11 July 1996 — The first synchronization to the grid of Unit 1.
2 December 1996 — Cernavoda NPP Unit 1 enters into commercial operation.
30 June 1997 — The transfer of Unit 1 management and operation responsibilities from AAC to Romanian personnel.
2 July 1998 — The setting up of the national company Societatea Nationala Nuclearelectrica S.A. (SNN) by dividing the RENEL energy conglomerate, with SNN on one side and the Autonomous Authority for Nuclear Activities on the other.
30 September 1999 — Cernavoda NPP Unit 1 ranks tenth in world capacity.
February 2003 — Canadian, French, Italian and US loan agreements are signed with Societe Generale, Credit Lyonnais and the Romanian Bank for Development for Unit 2 completion.
24 March 2003 — The contract for the completion and commissioning of Cernavoda NPP Unit 2 enters into force.
30 March 2004 — EURATOM Loan is approved by the European Commission, subject to the implementation of a well defined improvement package.
December 2005 — The completion of Unit 2’s main systems and transfer of procedures to the commissioning team, comprising a total number of 154 systems.
6 May 2007 — The initiation of the chain reaction (criticality) at Unit 2, at 23:25 hours.
7 August 2007 — The first synchronization of Unit 2 with the national power system, at 25% of the reactor’s capacity of 700 MW(e), at 17:21 hours.
12 September 2007 — Unit 2 reaches full power for the first time during commissioning tests.
28 September 2007 — The management of Unit 2 is turned over to SNN.
5 October 2007 — The official inauguration of Cernavoda NPP Unit 2.
25 March 2009 — Incorporation and registration of EnergoNuclear project company, responsible for the construction of Units 3 and 4.
November 2010 — The European Commission granted a positive opinion on Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 in compliance with the provisions of article 41 of the FORATOM Treaty, which certifies the application of technical and nuclear safety criteria.
25 September 2013 — The environment agreement for continuing construction and completion of Units 3 and 4 is obtained.
November 2013 — Listing of SNN shares on the Bucharest Stock Exchange.
August 2014 — The Government of Romania and the SNN general meeting of shareholders approve the strategy for the continuation of the project and the launching of a new selection procedure for investors.
November 2014 — China General Nuclear Power Corporation (CGN) is declared the selected investor for Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 after passing the selection procedure.
November 2015 — SNN and CGN sign the memorandum of understanding for the continuation of Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 and negotiations begin on the investment documents (the articles of incorporation and investors agreement), negotiations for which have been extended until the present day by successive resolutions of the SNN GMS. Both Romania and China are committed to the completion of the project.
September 2017 — SNN GMS approves the initiation of the first phase of the refurbishment of Cernavoda NPP Unit 1, commissioned in 1996.
April 2019 – SNN GMS approved the Preliminary Form of the Investors Agreement on Units 3 and 4 at Cernavoda NPP concluded between China General Nuclear Power Corporation and CGN Central and Eastern Europe Investment (RO) CO.S.A. and Nuclearelectrica SA National Company
Source: www.nuclearelectrica.ro.
2.1.2. Current organizational structure
Figure 1 shows the current organizational structure of Romania’s nuclear power programme.
FIG. 1. The main players involved in the nuclear power programme.
The main institutional pillars of the Romanian nuclear field are the following:
The energy sector is under the supervision of the Ministry of Energy, which formulates policies and strategies. The Ministry of Energy establishes the national strategy in the energy field and is the major shareholder of the nuclear energy production sector, nuclear research and engineering, nuclear fuel and heavy water production.
The Ministry of the Environment is the central authority for environmental protection and has specific responsibilities in the licensing and control of nuclear installations.
The National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control (CNCAN) is the nuclear safety and security regulatory authority of Romania, responsible for the regulation, licensing and control of nuclear activities, ensuring the peaceful use of nuclear energy and the protection of the public and workers from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
The Nuclear Agency and for Radioactive Waste (ANDR) is a specialized authority of the central public administration, acting as a legal entity coordinated by the Ministry of Economy. It is responsible for promoting the peaceful use of nuclear energy and related research or development programmes. ANDR is the national competent authority responsible for coordinating the pre-disposal management of spent fuel and radioactive waste from operations and decommissioning, being responsible for safe disposal.
SNN is the owner and operator of the Cernavoda nuclear power plant (NPP). The company includes two subsidiaries, one for nuclear power production (Cernavoda NPP) and one for nuclear fuel production (Nuclear Fuel Plant — FCN Pitesti), respectively. SNN is a government owned company, coordinated by the Ministry of Energy. The company was listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange in 2013 and, in its current shareholding structure, the Romanian State (through the Ministry of Energy) owns 82.49% of the shares. The remaining percentage is owned by Fondul Proprietatea (7.05%) and other shareholders (10.46%). Its main activities include electrical power and heat production, NPP construction and commissioning and nuclear fuel fabrication.
The state owned nuclear energy company (RATEN) is the strategic Romanian legal entity coordinating research and development (R&D) activity in the nuclear energy field, which maintains and develops the scientific and technologic support for the National Nuclear Energy Programme. RATEN is subordinated to the Ministry of Energy and manages two subsidiaries: the Institute for Nuclear Research (RATEN ICN) and the Centre for Nuclear Projects Engineering (RATEN CITON). The two organizations act as scientific, technical and engineering support (technical support organizations) for the safe operation of the Cernavoda NPP new build and for the other installations and projects that are part of the national nuclear power programme.
The National Uranium Company (CNU), government owned and subordinated to the Ministry of Energy, is responsible for uranium mining and milling activities, including geological research and exploitation activities for uranium ores, ore processing and refining, and commercialization of dioxide of uranium (UO2) and octoxide of uranium (U3O8). Currently, CNU is undergoing a reorganization procedure. As per the strategy for the diversification of the raw material supply sources necessary for the production of nuclear fuel approved by SNN GMS on 25 April 2018, SNN is carrying our due diligence for the potential takeover of the Feldioara U3O8 processing line of CNU. As per Law No. 193/2018, the uranium dioxide produced by CNU will be sold at a regulated tariff and SNN will procure it given the availability of the stock and the fulfilment of the quality criteria
2.2. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: OVERVIEW
2.2.1. Status and performance of nuclear power plants
Cernavoda NPP Units 1 and 2, both in operation (Table 5), ensure approximately 17-8% of the total energy generated in Romania.
TABLE 5. STATUS AND PERFORMANCE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
Reactor Unit | Type | Net Capacity [MW(e)] |
Status | Operator | Reactor Supplier |
Construction Date |
First Criticality Date |
First Grid Date |
Commercial Date |
Shutdown Date |
UCF for 2018 |
CERNAVODA-1 | PHWR | 650 | Operational | SNN | AECL | 1982-07-01 | 1996-04-16 | 1996-07-11 | 1996-12-02 | 89.0 | |
CERNAVODA-2 | PHWR | 650 | Operational | SNN | AECL | 1983-07-01 | 2007-05-06 | 2007-08-07 | 2007-11-01 | 98.2 | |
CERNAVODA-3 | PHWR | 655 | Suspended Constr. | SNN | AECL | 1984-02-09 | |||||
CERNAVODA-4 | PHWR | 655 | Suspended Constr. | SNN | AECL | 1985-08-15 | |||||
CERNAVODA-5 | PHWR | 655 | Cancelled Constr. | SNN | AECL | 1987-05-12 | 2014-03-11 |
Data source: IAEA - Power Reactor Information System (PRIS). | |||||||||||
Note: Table is completely generated from PRIS data to reflect the latest available information and may be more up to date than the text of the report. |
The Romanian energy strategy does not provide for the completion of Cernavoda NPP Unit 5 as it does for Units 3 and 4; instead, it requires the capitalization of the works and assets to be used in relation to the operation of the other units. The feasibility study for the change of scope of Unit 5 was completed in 2011.
2.2.2. Plant upgrading, plant life management and licence renewals
Regulatory framework
Law No. 111 of 1996 on the safe deployment, regulation, licensing and control of nuclear activities, republished with subsequent modifications and completions, provides the legislative framework governing the safety of nuclear installations. The licensing process for nuclear installations is based on the provisions of the law and of the nuclear safety regulations issued by CNCAN. The operating licence for a nuclear installation is issued by the CNCAN for a specific period. In the past, the regulatory practice was to issue the licence for a nuclear power reactor for a specific term of ten years, with the possibility of the licence being renewed every ten years, taking the periodic safety review into account. In January 2019, a new regulation on licensing (NSN-22) came into force, which establishes that operating licences for nuclear installations are granted for the periods estimated by the applicant, taking into consideration the design basis, the ageing mechanisms, the operational experience available and the possibility for refurbishment. The licence can be revised and modified. The estimated period of operation can be revised and either extended or reduced based on the safety reviews (including the ten year periodic safety reviews) performed during the operational lifetime of the nuclear installation. The existing licences will be subject to renewal in accordance with the new regulation NSN-22.
Long term operation is allowed for as long as it can be demonstrated that the safety analyses and design basis and licensing basis remain valid and that sufficient safety margins exist for the entire period for which the licence is requested and granted, provided that the licensee complies with the operating limits and conditions. In accordance with the new licensing regulation, refurbishment and long term operation are considered part of the operational phase and are covered by specific limits and conditions in the operating licence.
Compliance with the regulatory requirements is verified on the occasion of initial licensing, for licence renewals, for each periodic safety review, as well as on a regular basis through normal regulatory oversight processes. The main document submitted to CNCAN by the licensee for justifying long term/extended operation is the updated final safety analysis report. This report contains the safety demonstration for the plant, taking into account the physical state of the installation, the impact of ageing, the safety upgrades performed and the current safety requirements and standards.
CNCAN issues nuclear safety regulations and guides providing the basis for the licensing and regulatory oversight of the Cernavoda NPP, issued in various areas such as NPP siting, design and construction, licensing of the personnel and of the nuclear facilities, on-site emergency preparedness and response, safety reviews and safety requirements, and quality management systems. The complete set of regulations and guides applicable to nuclear installations is available on CNCAN’s web site: www.cncan.ro/despre-noi/legislatie/norme/.
Lifetime extension of Unit 1
Initiated in 2013, the refurbishment of Cernavoda NPP Unit 1 represents the largest investment project developed exclusively by SNN, as Unit 1 was initially commissioned on 2 December 1996. The pressure tubes of the fuel channels of the CANDU 600 plants were designed for a life of 210 000 hours of operation at rated power (effective full power hours — EFPH), which, at a capacity factor of 80%, indicates a 30 year economic operational life. The main life limiting components and structures include fuel channels, feeders and nuclear reactor containment. Due to design improvements implemented over time and judiciously performed operation and maintenance, Unit 1 has routinely operated at a capacity factor of 90%. Therefore, Unit 1 will reach 210 000 hours of operation at rated power in late 2023, after approximately 26.6 years of operation since its commissioning, and about 3.4 years before reaching its designed lifetime of 30 years.
In recent years, the nuclear industry has researched the behaviour of fuel channels over time and the ageing mechanisms that affect them, in order to extend their lifetime beyond the initially estimated design limits. The international experience for the extension of the fuel channel lifetime and the results of the previous inspections led to the preliminary assessment that Unit 1 could operate for approximatively 245 000 hours of operation (30 calendar years) under nuclear safety conditions and efficiency in operation.
A longer operating period has positive effects on the preparation and development of refurbishment works by:
Extending the period for a company to accumulate the necessary funds for the project;
Allowing adequate time to better prepare the project and organize works to be developed during the refurbishment process.
By Decision No. 9 of 28 September 2017, the SNN shareholders approved the initiation of Phase I of the refurbishment strategy of Unit 1 Cernavoda, which includes the extension of operating hours beyond 210 000 EFPH. Within this phase, studies regarding the extension of the operating hours beyond 210 000 EFPH will be conducted, as well as studies necessary to elaborate the feasibility study. The feasibility study will be submitted for approval to the SNN GMS in 2021.
The refurbishment project for Unit 1 CNE Cernavoda will be structured in three phases:
Phase 1 — Project definition (pre-project organizational works, activities necessary to provide the operation of Unit 1 beyond the 210 000 EFPH, preparation of the feasibility study).
Phase 2 — Project implementation (engineering works, procurement of equipment, engineering, procurement and construction (ECP) contract, obtaining necessary authorizations).
Phase 3 — Shutting down the reactor and effective development of the refurbishment project (actual refurbishment outage estimated at 24 months between December 2026 and December 2028).
Corrective actions implemented based on lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi accident
Following the Fukushima Daiichi accident in March 2011, the Romanian authorities and the nuclear industry performed assessments of nuclear safety and emergency preparedness arrangements and implemented improvements, in line with international efforts in this direction. A national action plan was developed for bringing together the actions identified from regulatory reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews and generic recommendations at the international level.
The actions taken by CNCAN and the Cernavoda NPP to take account of the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident have been presented in detail in public reports:
National Report of Romania for the 2nd Extraordinary Meeting under the Convention on Nuclear Safety (May 2012) (www.cncan.ro/assets/Informatii-Publice/06-Rapoarte/RO-National-Report-for-2nd-Extraordinary-Meeting-under-CNS-May2012-doc.pdf);
Reports on the implementation of the European Union’s ‘stress tests’ by Romania: (www.ensreg.eu/EU-Stress-Tests/Country-Specific-Reports/EU-Member-States/Romania).
The latest status of the implementation of the national action plan post-Fukushima is presented in a report available on CNCAN’s web site (www.cncan.ro/assets/Informatii-Publice/06-Rapoarte/Rapoarte-Comisia-Europeana/Romanian-National-Action-Plan-post-Fukushima-rev.2-30.12.2017.pdf).
CNCAN monitors the licensee’s progress in implementing the improvements and continues to perform safety reviews and inspections to ensure that all the opportunities for improvement are properly addressed, taking account of the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident.
The main improvements at the Cernavoda NPP during 2011–2017 are the following:
Procurement and testing of mobile equipment (e.g. mobile diesel generators, mobile pumps, connections) and provision of a new emergency operating procedure for responding to station blackout events;
Installation of a dedicated emergency containment filtered venting system for each NPP unit;
Installation of passive autocatalytical recombiners for hydrogen management;
Additional instrumentation for severe accident management (e.g. hydrogen concentration monitoring in different areas of the reactor building);
Implementation of design modifications for water make-up to the calandria vessel and the calandria vault;
Provision of connection facilities required to add water using fire trucks and flexible conduits to supply the primary side of the raw service water/recirculating cooling water heat exchangers and steam generators under emergency conditions;
Validation of the station’s Severe Accident Management Guidelines through emergency exercises;
Training for severe accident scenarios, including as part of the emergency drills;
Installation of a seismically qualified line for water make-up to the spent fuel bay to ensure cooling under severe accident conditions, and provision for natural ventilation of vapours and steam evacuation;
New seismically qualified location for the on-site emergency control centre and fire fighters (this development is currently in progress).
Source: www.nuclearelectrica.ro.
2.2.3. Permanent shutdown and decommissioning process
Currently, there are no decommissioned nuclear units in Romania (Table 6).
TABLE 6. STATUS OF DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
Reactor unit | Shutdown reason | Decommission strategy | Current decommissioning phase | Current fuel management phase | Decommissioning licensee | Licence terminated year |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
n.a.: Data not applicable.
2.3. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER SECTOR
2.3.1. Nuclear power development strategy
Brief history and main decisions
The Government of Romania has plans to further increase the country’s nuclear generating capacity through the commissioning of Units 3 and 4 of the Cernavoda NPP (Table 7). Decision No. 643 of 2007 approved the strategy for attracting investors for the Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4, including the schedule for setting up a new company responsible for project completion.
On 29 March 2009, the project company was registered as S.C. EnergoNuclear S.A. with the National Trade Register Office and the management team was appointed. EnergoNuclear was a public–private capital company formed by the selected investors (ArcelorMittal Romania (6.2%); CEZ, Czech Republic (9.15%); GDF SUEZ, Belgium (9.15%); ENEL, Italy (9.15%); Iberdrola, Spain (6.2%); RWE Power Germany (9.15%); and SNN (51%).
In 2011, the investors GDF SUEZ, CEZ, RWE and Iberdrola withdrew from the project, in addition to ENEL and ArcelorMittal. Currently, SNN is the sole shareholder of the project company EnergoNuclear S.A.
On 22 August 2014, the SNN GMS approved the strategy for the continuation of Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 through the launch of a competitive selection procedure for a private investor with a view of establishing a joint venture. The selection procedure was launched on 27 August 2014, and the qualification phase was completed on 9 September 2014, when CGN was declared a qualified investor. After analysis of the documentation of intent (the expertise of the investor with similar projects, the financial capability, the degree of adherence of the qualified investor to the memorandum for the implementation of the project proposed by SNN as well as to the strategy), CGN was declared a selected investor on 17 October 2014 by the signing of a joint letter on the intention to complete the project.
On 22 October 2015, the shareholders of SNN approved the memorandum of understanding for the development, construction, operation and decommissioning of Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4, which was signed between the parties on 9 November 2015. After several negotiation period extensions, SNN and CGN are currently in the process of negotiating the investors agreement and articles of incorporation of the new project company.
As per the strategy for the continuation of the project, a joint venture company will be set up between SNN and the selected investor (CGN), which is a precursor to an independent power producer (IPP) type company for an estimated duration of two years. The company will be responsible for a feasibility study of the project under current market conditions, evaluation of assets and the final investment decision in order to move to the implementation phase, estimated at seven years.
On 14 September 2018, SNN shareholders approved the revised strategy for the continuation of Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 project with a view of reorganizing the negotiation/approval stages and terminating the activity of the designated commissions (the Negotiation Commission and the Interministerial Commission), the negotiations being conducted by a Negotiation Commission appointed by the executive management of SNN. The revised strategy also provided that the investors agreement and articles of incorporation of the new joint venture company will be subject to the approval of the SNN GMS within the limit of competences and attributions.
On 10 April 2019, SNN GMS approved the Preliminary Form of the Investors Agreement on Units 3 and 4 at Cernavoda NPP concluded between China General Nuclear Power Corporation and CGN Central and Eastern Europe Investment (RO) CO.S.A. and Nuclearelectrica SA National Company. Following this approval, after the signing of the project documents, the next step is the incorporation of the new project company with a duration of two years and an initial capital of ROL 90 000.
Project structure
The Romanian State will have a minority stake in the project (49% and no less than 30%, depending on future capital contributions) represented by an in kind contribution with the existing assets, the heavy water inventory produced for Units 3 and 4 and an initial cash contribution of EUR 2 000 000 to the incorporation of the joint venture. EnergoNuclear will be absorbed into the new project company. The joint venture company will be responsible for making the decision on the contracting of EPC services, obtaining the necessary authorizations and approvals for starting the works, including support mechanisms for the project and notification to the European Commission. SNN will also have the right to supply nuclear fuel and operation and maintenance services to the new company during the commercial operation phase at a cost plus margin comparable to the market conditions.
TABLE 7. PLANNED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
Reactor unit/Project name | Owner | Type | Capacity in MW(e) | Expected construction start year | Expected commercial year |
Cernavoda 3 | IPP | CANDU 6 | 720 | 2022 | 2030 |
Cernavoda 4 | IPP | CANDU 6 | 720 | 2022 | 2032 |
Policies for front end and back end nuclear fuel cycle (mining, converting, enriching, fabricating, reprocessing and managing spent fuel and waste, etc.)
Romania developed an open nuclear fuel cycle which covers extraction of uranium ore, processing and refining of uranium ore into uranium dioxide, the manufacture of nuclear fuel, burning the nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors to produce electricity and storage and disposal of radioactive waste and spent fuel, without ensuring spent fuel reprocessing.
Strategy for funding long term management of spent fuel and decommissioning
SNN makes the following contributions to the decommissioning and safe disposal funds administered by the ANDR:
Contribution for the decommissioning of the units in operation of 0.6 euro/MWh of energy produced and delivered to the national power grid;
Contribution for the disposal of the radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel of 1.4 euro/MWh of energy produced and delivered to the national power grid.
2.3.2. Project management
The main organizations involved in the implementation of the Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 project are the following:
SNN — The operator of Cernavoda NPP Units 1 and 2 and the owner of Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4. Romania, through SNN, is party to the memorandum of understanding signed with the selected investor, CGN, for the implementation of the project. SNN, together with CGN, will establish a joint venture, precursor to an independent power producer responsible for the implementation of the project. Romania, through SNN, will have a minority share in the JC and IPP, but no less than 30%. The construction licence is issued by the regulatory body, CNCAN.
The Ministry of Energy — Part of the negotiation process, involved in the Negotiation Commission. Responsible for decision making and approving the mandate of the State’s representative in the GMS of SNN.
2.3.3. Project funding
The current economic and electricity market context does not adequately provide supportive conditions to develop the large electricity infrastructure projects necessary for the electricity sector. Romania should allow carbon emission technologies alongside nuclear technologies despite the capital intensive long completion periods of nuclear. Romania’s strategy for the continuation of the nuclear project provides support mechanisms to facilitate further development, such as contracts for differences, free energy markets and in line with the European regulations on transparency, competition and state aid. The support mechanism will allow the predictability of investment recoverability and will be based on current market conditions at the time of its approval; an approval from the European Commission for the support mechanism will be necessary.
The implementation of the contracts for difference (Cfd) financing instruments is being pursued in Romania as the Ministry of Energy commissioned a study about the impact and implementation of CfD for energy sources without greenhouse emissions in Romania. The Ministry of Energy also introduced into public debate the general principles regarding the implementation of a support mechanism based on CfD for low carbon emissions energy sources.
2.3.4. Electric grid development
Not applicable.
2.3.5. Sites
Not applicable.
2.3.6. Public awareness
SNN organizes national opinion polls every two years to measure public awareness and trust in relation to the use of nuclear power in Romania. The most recent opinion poll was conducted in 2018. In this study, the Romanian public generally has a favourable opinion of nuclear power projects (67% support the construction of Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 and 60% agree to the life extension of Unit 1). The level of information of the population about nuclear power has also risen and the concerns about safety issues have decreased (risk of accident 13%, risk or radiation contamination 18%). The most important arguments perceived by the population in support of nuclear power are the reduced cost of nuclear power (41%) and energy independence (33%). Forty-two per cent of Romanians (increasing from 34%) consider that Cernavoda NPP Units 3 and 4 should be developed as soon as possible and in cooperation with foreign investors. For the first time in the history of opinion polls carried out by SNN, most Romanians (43%) consider that the benefits of nuclear power outweigh the risks and also 56% of Romanians understand the fact that the production of nuclear power is safe in Romania. These positive results are due to the communication and public information efforts of SNN, as the main promoter of nuclear power. The opposition to nuclear projects in Romania is not significant, though some opposition has been posed by organizations such as Greenpeace and Terra Mileniul 3. Public opinion in Romania is generally favourable towards new nuclear projects. SNN promotes a collaborative approach to non-governmental organizations (NGOs), making information available and being open to discussion.
Source: www.nuclearelectrica.ro.
2.4. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN CONSTRUCTION OF NPPs
The most recent survey of the capabilities of the Romanian nuclear industry was conducted in 2018, when around 42 companies were surveyed and catalogued as potential suppliers of services, equipment and works to the nuclear field:
21 companies specialized in manufacturing equipment and components;
10 companies specialized in construction and fitting works;
11 companies specialized in engineering, design, research and consultancy services.
It is estimated that the goods and services that can be provided by the Romanian nuclear industry have a value of EUR 1.0–1.6 billion. The number of staff involved in the nuclear field in 2018 was 11 000, which could increase to 19 000 if the project to build Units 3 and 4 continues. The Romanian nuclear industry is represented by the Romanian Atomic Forum, which is affiliated with the European Atomic Forum (FORATOM).
2.5. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN OPERATION OF NPPs
Cernavoda NPP Units 1 and 2 are operated by SNN. The operation of the Cernavoda NPP is regulated by CNCAN and other authorities, through operating licences and permits which are renewed on a regular basis. A series of works and services are externalized, being supplied by contractors selected with the application of the public procurement legislation and in compliance with the nuclear safety standards.
2.6. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN DECOMMISSIONING OF NPPs
Not applicable.
2.7. FUEL CYCLE INCLUDING WASTE MANAGEMENT
Mining and milling
The National Uranium Company (CNU) is responsible for uranium mining and milling activities.
Uranium mining activities started in Romania in 1952. CNU is the State’s representative in this activity and has three uranium mining branches (EMs): Bihor — EM Bihor, Banat — EM Banat, and Suceava — EM Crucea. These mines were commissioned in 1983 and 1985 but are now almost depleted. CNU is planning to develop additional uranium deposits.
Uranium conversion
Uranium ore is processed by the Feldioara plant, operated by CNU. This plant was commissioned in 1978. The Feldioara processing plant has two modules:
‘R’ type module for uranium milling and concentration (nominal capacity 300 t U(U3O8)/y);
‘E’ type module for uranium refining and conversion to nuclear grade UO2 (nominal capacity 300 t U(UO2)/y).
Both modules are in operation, but the production capacity is reduced to about 100 t U(U3O8)/y for the R plant, and on request (by the Pitesti fuel fabrication plant (FCN Pitesti)) for the E plant. The Feldioara processing plant has been qualified by AECL as a CANDU UO2 fuel supplier.
Fuel fabrication
Each reactor at the Cernavoda NPP uses 105 tonnes of natural uranium oxide fuel annually, which is fabricated by FCN Pitesti, a subsidiary of SNN.
Storage of spent fuel (e.g. wet, dry)
Spent fuel generated by operation of the Cernavoda NPP is stored on-site in the wet storage facility for a minimum of six years before being transferred to the interim dry storage facility (DICA). The dry storage technology is based on the MACSTOR system. It consists of storage modules located outdoors at the storage site and equipment operated at the spent fuel storage bay for preparing the spent fuel for dry storage. DICA is located on the NPP site, close to the containment building of Unit 5. It has a design lifetime of 50 years, being a modular type construction, allowing for staged construction as the spent fuel is transferred from the wet storage facility. DICA is designed to store the spent fuel from CNE Cernavoda Units 1 and 2; 27 modules of type MACSTOR 200. As of 2018, nine modules are in operation.
Spent fuel from the Cernavoda NPP bound for DICA is transferred using a trailer that takes the transfer container containing a storage basket with 60 fuel bundles and transports it to DICA on a specific route that is not connected to the public road.
Currently, a new strategy for the future development of DICA has been approved. Two major changes are the future use of double capacity MACSTOR 400 modules instead of MACSTOR 200 as well as an increase in the storage area. Based on this revised strategy, a better use of the existing storage area and adequate storage capacity for the planned long term operation of Units 1 and 2 is expected.
Disposal of spent nuclear fuel
According to the provisions of the National Strategy on Medium and Long Term Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste, currently under review by ANDR and in cooperation with a number of other organizations, a deep geological repository is expected to be commissioned around 2055 in order to accommodate spent fuel generated by the Cernavoda NPP.
Source: www.nuclearelectrica.ro ; www.agentianucleara.ro.
2.8. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
2.8.1. R&D organizations
Technologies for Nuclear Energy State Owned Company — RATEN
Established on 1 October 2013 owing to the reorganization of the Romanian Authority for Nuclear Activities and separating the R&D and technological engineering activities, RATEN provides technical support for the nuclear power activities in Romania. The company is organized and acts as a strategic Romanian legal entity, coordinating R&D in the nuclear power field, maintaining and developing the technical competencies throughout the entire lifetime of the nuclear installations, being involved in the energy strategy development and achievement of the scientific and technical objectives of the national nuclear power programme.
RATEN’s main activities include the following:
Research, design and technological engineering activities;
Technology development as national scientific and technical support concerning the safe operation of nuclear installations;
Technology development for the new type of GEN IV reactors;
Technology development for spent fuel and radioactive waste management;
Radioisotope production for medicine and industry;
Competence maintenance in the nuclear field, education and training of new specialists;
Development of competencies and capabilities in the nuclear field to provide technical support to public institutions.
The RATEN strategy is sustained by an annual R&D programme, which is supported by 18 programmes (www.raten.ro).
The main research priorities are the following:
To maintain and develop scientific and technical support for the safe operation of CANDU units of the Cernavoda NPP, including their lifetime extension;
To develop studies and research in the materials and nuclear fuels field, reactor physics, nuclear safety, equipment and instrumentation and control for nuclear power applications;
To sustain the research activities for GEN IV reactors;
To implement lead cooled fast reactor technology;
To manage the characterization and treatment of radioactive waste, environmental and radiation protection, scientific research capacity and technology transfer, and develop and implement nuclear technologies or infrastructure for applications in industry, medicine and physical protection.
The annual R&D programme is funded by the Government of Romania, through the Ministry of Energy.
RATEN manages two subsidiaries:
The Institute for Nuclear Research Pitesti, RATEN ICN (www.nuclear.ro);
The Centre of Technology and Engineering for Nuclear Projects Bucuresti Magurele, RATEN CITON (www.citon.ro).
RATEN ICN Pitesti provides scientific and technical support for the safe and economical operation of NPPs, in accordance with the national and international agreements. The institute operates its own nuclear research infrastructure licensed and acknowledged by CNCAN:
TRIGA research reactor (a pool type, completely converted from high enriched uranium to low enriched uranium);
Post-irradiation examination laboratory (equipped with facilities and equipment that allow testing, handling and examination of nuclear fuel and structural materials from nuclear power plants, manufacturing sealed sources for industrial radiography);
Radioactive waste treatment plant;
Out of pile testing department;
Nuclear materials and corrosion department;
Testing labs for characterization of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste, radiological characterization of materials resulting from nuclear practices;
Radiation protection, environmental protection and civil protection laboratory;
Surface analysis laboratory.
RATEN ICN competencies include the following:
Nuclear safety assessments;
Reactor physics and thermal hydraulics;
Materials behaviour;
Post-irradiation examination of materials and nuclear fuel, nuclear materials and corrosion tests;
Manufacturing technologies for TRIGA and advanced nuclear fuels;
Out of pile testing;
Characterization, treatment and conditioning of radioactive waste;
Safe disposal of radioactive waste;
Electronics, instrumentation and control;
Tests and qualifications for nuclear equipment and instrumentation;
Radiation protection, environmental protection and emergency preparedness;
Design of nuclear equipment.
RATEN CITON, structured as a design and engineering institute for nuclear projects and to carry out R&D associated with the implementation of the national nuclear programme, performs design and engineering work and provides technical assistance and engineering support for the construction, installation, commissioning, operation and maintenance of nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities. As a full service engineering institute, RATEN CITON can assist customers with all phases of project implementation, including support development.
RATEN CITON engages in the following activities:
Detailed design for process and support systems associated with a CANDU-600 NPP;
Detailed design for adjacent installations and support systems for nuclear research reactors and labs;
Nuclear safety analyses;
Methodologies for computation and computer assisted design;
Technical and economic studies for siting as well as cost estimates for new designs and for operational design modifications for NPP systems and components;
Thermohydraulic calculations and stress analyses for various operating conditions, using specialized computer programs;
Technical assistance for equipment fabrication, installation, testing and commissioning;
Prognoses regarding the national power system development, especially nuclear power trends.
Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH)
IFIN-HH is committed to the development of knowledge in physics, especially of subatomic physics, and expanding the impact of the nuclear domain in society through advanced research and professional services in basic and applied physics research.
IFIN-HH is a technical support institute under Law 111 of 1996 and has protocols with national authorities to provide equipment and accredited laboratory expertise to the National System for the Management of Emergencies in Romania, including emergency preparedness and response training activities.
National Research and Development Institute for Cryogenic and Isotopic Technologies — ICSI Rm. Valcea
ICSI Rm. Vâlcea is a scientific research and technological development unit under the coordination of the Ministry of Research and Innovation. The main research and development areas of ICSI Rm. Valcea are as follows:
Fundamental and applicative research: isotope separation technologies; physics of condensed states — cryogenics; physics of materials — catalysts; energy — nuclear, hydrogen — fuel cells, energy storage solutions; life science and environment — radioprotection, analytical techniques.
Technological development: technologies (deuterium/tritium separation); prototypes (fuel cells, Li-ion batteries); advanced analytical methods.
Technological transfer: in ecology, environment and industry (waste recovery, environmental studies), food industry (origin markers).
The organizational structure of ICSI Rm. Vâlcea was reconsidered starting in 2019 by defining the four departments: ICSI Nuclear, ICSI Energy, ICSI Analytics and ICSI Business. Each of these departments has been assigned a mission and scope of action, consistent with the overall ICSI development strategy. Thus, the mission and strategic objectives for each entity were defined as follows:
ICSI Nuclear is a mission oriented department working on the development of tritium management technology and which, in this niche domain, has all the conditions to develop research of excellence. The department, which includes National Interest Objective — Pilot Plant for Tritium and Deuterium Separation (PESTD), has a development strategy that goes beyond this limitation and prepares research programmes in the field of storage, permeation and tritium interactions with materials in the short term, in view of using these results in the fusion field. PESTD was designed to develop the technology for heavy water detritiation from the CANDU-like reactors and to assess the equipment and tools involved in cryogenics and tritiated environments. There are no other similar plants of this scale in Europe, and it is one of the few of its kind worldwide. The scientific community from the country and abroad is welcome to collaborate on a variety of topics such as hydrogen isotope separation technologies, materials and equipment for tritium application, tritium analysis and life science. From the European research perspective, the plant provides the possibility of running experiments in the frame of ITER (the fusion programme) and facilitates collaborative work with other research institutes such as MOL Research Centre, Belgium; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany; Institute of Atomic Physics — B.P. Konstantinov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russian Federation; China Academy of Engineering Physics, China; and National Fusion Research Institute, Republic of Korea. Experience related to design of processes and equipment can be used for tritium processing plants for both heavy water detritiation facilities for CANDU reactors, or as detritiation systems as part of fusion reactors (ITER, DEMO).
ICSI Energy is the research department focused on new technologies related to sustainable energy systems of the future, with a wide range of working groups, from the development of catalyst-type materials for electrochemical fuel cell reactions or new materials for lithium based batteries (nano level) to those aimed at validating hydrogen and hybrid hydrogen mobility technologies or integrated energy storage systems. Department includes National Interest Objective — National Center for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell.
ICSI Analytics, ICSI’s analysis laboratories, work to develop and implement advanced investigation methods, then transfer them to meet the needs of society and the economy through integrated analytical approaches to quality and environmental impact in all its forms — water, air and soil, as well as in certification and authentication of origin for various food or environmental matrices. Featuring a host of state of the art tools, and based on the expertise and capability of a professional team, ICSI Analytics manages to successfully combine research with technology transfer by providing services/expertise and studies to a large number of beneficiaries from the country and abroad.
ICSI Business, originally a business incubator, has expanded its competence to promote and mediate technology transfer applying the main results obtained in the ICSI. It has the mission to maximize the contribution of extrabudgetary funds for the proper conduct of the activities of the three research departments, but also to identify the possibilities of marketing the products/technologies generated by them.
2.8.2. Development of advanced nuclear power technologies
Romania joined the EURATOM R&D initiative devoted to the development of the Generation IV lead fast reactor (LFR) technology and, through RATEN ICN, is involved in R&D and in the construction of the LFR European demonstrator (ALFRED). Following RATEN ICN’s participation in the EU Framework Programme LEADER, the Government of Romania issued Memorandum No. 20/2925 of February 2011, in which it determined that the country would host the ALFRED demonstration reactor at the Mioveni nuclear platform. The demonstrator reactor is being developed primarily by the FALCON consortium (Ansaldo Nucleare and ENEA, Italy; RATEN ICN, Romania) and with R&D cooperation with several European organizations. The ALFRED project implementation plan is developed by FALCON members, with the support of the national governments of Romania and Italy. It provides the necessary activities for research, design, siting and licensing during four phases (viability, preparation, construction and operation) with a target date for commissioning by 2028. Feasibilities studies for the first research, testing and qualification experimental support facilities (addressing thermal hydraulic processes and lead chemistry) and funding applications are under evaluation by the project financing authority (Ministry of Research and Innovation).
The ALFRED project is included in the Romanian relevant strategies (proposed energy technologies that are part of the national energy strategy, national research, development and innovation strategy, national research infrastructure roadmap) and will be funded by the national research and innovation plan and European funds.
Source: https://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/147643_en.html; www.nuclear.ro.
2.8.3. International cooperation and initiatives
Romania is active in a number of international nuclear organizations, including: the IAEA, the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD/NEA), as well as other bilateral and multilateral organizations such as World Association of Nuclear Operators—Atlanta Centre, COG (CANDU Owners Group), World Nuclear Association and Electric Power Research Institute, benefiting from a continuous exchange of experience in the field. Romanian scientists are actively involved in international research projects such as: International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO), Generation IV International Forum (GIF), EU research framework programme Horizon 2020 EURATOM (2014–2020), and the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre. Many are also associated with nuclear basic research projects developed within the international research network or in cooperation with international research institutes (e.g. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna; European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva; Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research, Darmstadt).
Details on each main Romanian institute involved in specific projects in the framework of each of these international cooperation initiatives can be found on the following web sites: www.raten.ro, www.nuclear.ro, www.citon.ro, www.nipne.ro, www.icsi.ro, www.andr.ro, www.nuclearelectrica.ro.
2.9. HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
At the end of 2018, SNN had a staff workforce of 2008. Recruitment and retention of highly qualified staff is of high importance to SNN in order to achieve knowledge transfer and also to ensure human resources for the future projects of the company. Nuclearelectrica has launched an extensive human resources programme focused on partnerships with universities, scholarship programmes for students, motivation and retention programmes, talent management and intensive specialized training (including MBA programmes) for staff.
RATEN maintains a qualified staff (as of December 2017: 60 PhDs, 20 PhD candidates, 390 researchers, nuclear scientists and engineers) with experience in training for the safe and efficient operation of research reactors, nuclear materials testing, radioactive waste treatment, planning activities and emergency preparedness, development of scenarios for exercises, technical support for local and national emergency planning, radiological assistance with the transport of nuclear and radioactive materials, characterization of nuclear materials to support the combat of illicit trafficking and training personnel in emergency response responsibilities.
RATEN ICN signed partnership agreements with the University of Pitesti and Politehnica University of Bucharest for educational activities for students in the labs and for guiding Master and PhD theses. In 2017, 24 students completed their Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees. Master and PhD candidates at international institutions have attended lectures and participated in experimental activities in the Reactor Physics and Fuel Performance Department on the TRIGA research reactor PIEL since 2014. In 2017, 27 MA and PhD candidates participated in theoretical and experimental activities.
2.10. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
SNN positions itself as a complex entity, with multiple roles in relation to each stakeholder group: a contributor to the national energy grid, an economic pillar for the local and national budget, an investment partner for its shareholders, a protector for its employees, a promotor of nuclear new build, research and education and the like.
SNN has a clear and consistent strategy for addressing all the stakeholder groups identified as relevant to its activity and developing the necessary tools and channels appropriate for each category so that information can flow bidirectionally. SNN’s main communication tools used in relation to the stakeholders are part of its relations management strategy; they include: media relations, institutional relations, stakeholder engagement and investor relations. The main goal is the dissemination of information through press releases, press conferences, web sites and information materials tailored to the interests of the specific stakeholder with the purpose of creating a basis of trust and support for nuclear power and the activities of the company and to comply with the applicable legal framework. Relations management is based on credibility, truth, transparency, relevance and feedback. Stakeholders’ feedback is monitored on a regular basis through monthly media analysis and image indicator mapping as well as through biannual nationwide opinion polls. SNN applies the provisions of the Espoo and Aarhus conventions regarding public participation and seeks to have a proactive approach towards all stakeholders, mapping their needs, interests and concerns and addressing them through its communication products. Based on indicators such as nuclear safety awareness, investment project awareness, competency awareness and local community involvement awareness, which are monitored on a monthly basis, SNN adjusts its public discourse in order to cover all areas of interest.
Interaction and communication with stakeholders, including participation in the decision making process, are connected with the environmental issues stipulated by the Aarhus Convention, the Espoo Convention and the transposition of these into national laws (Law No. 86 of 2000, Law No. 22 of 2001). The environmental impact assessment framework is stipulated in Decision No. 918 of 2002, including the list of private and public projects requesting environmental impact assessments.
Also, Decision No. 1115 of 2002 (which provides for free access to environmental information) stipulates the obligations of owners and operators to provide relevant information. Two other documents are applied for nuclear materials: Decision No. 162 of 2002 regarding obligations on waste handling, conditioning and depositing, and Decision No. 95 of 2003 on the control of activities with potential for danger and major accidents and handling of dangerous substances.
All these laws as well as the norms released by national authorities are harmonized with EU frameworks and include recommendations of the IAEA.
The information on existing and planned nuclear facilities is available to the general public mainly on web sites. The responsibility for issuing information is on the owner of a nuclear installation.
An important example of participation in Romania consists of the involvement of the communities from Cernavoda (NPP location) and Saligny (future site for a low and intermediate level waste repository). After some years of exchanging information and practice within GMF (group of European municipalities with nuclear facilities) and in the frame of the FP6-COWAM2 and FP7-CIP projects, a local committee was established in the town of Cernavoda in 2012. This committee is recognized as a partner for the discussions between the NPP and local community. The full name is Committee for Information and Consultation of Citizens from Cernavoda. It is a single stand alone initiative that has regular monthly meetings. The minutes of the local committee may be consulted on the web site of the Cernavoda NPP.
The Cernavoda local committee has influenced neighbouring communities to build an association of municipalities around the NPP and include in the current agenda the issues relating to the siting of the low and intermediate level waste repository in Saligny. In 2012, this association was extended at the national level as ALUN (Association of Romanian Municipalities Hosting Nuclear Utilities). The objective of the association is to collaborate in order to initiate some legislative proposals aimed at helping the municipalities in the management of emergency situations.
The stakeholders, including the local community, were involved from the beginning in the development of the infrastructure for Generation IV, including the ALFRED demonstrator. A local dialogue group between implementer, RATEN, and the local communities (Mioveni city), with some active communication activities, has been created.
2.11. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
The general framework for emergency preparedness and response was proposed by the national strategy for prevention of emergency situations, and was approved by Decision No. 762 of 2008. This strategy includes nuclear accident and radiological emergencies, among other types of emergency, and establishes responsibilities of state authorities and enterprises concerning the design and implementation of appropriate contingency plans according to the type, magnitude and expected consequences of a disaster.
The National System for the Management of Emergencies in Romania aims at prevention and management of emergency situations and the planning and coordination of human, material and financial resources. It is composed of three types of structures:
The decisional structure — the committees for emergencies;
The executive structure — the inspectorates for emergencies;
The operational structure — the operative centres for emergencies.
All the decisional, executive and operational structures are established on three levels: national, county and local. Written agreements and protocols are in place between the responsible organizations, at the local and national level, for common activities and exchange of information in emergency situations.
As a decision structure, at the national level, the National Committee for Special Emergency Situations (CNSSU) was set up under the coordination of the Prime Minister and is managed by the Minister of Internal Affairs. All the ministerial, county and local committees are subordinated to CNSSU. The county/local emergency committees are directed by the county prefect or local mayor.
The General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations (IGSU), a specialized body of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, is an executive structure at the national level. IGSU has the responsibility of permanent coordination for all the organizations involved in the prevention and management of emergency situations.
In case of an accident, the response starts at the lowest level and rises to the national level, if needed. Under the IGSU are the county inspectorates (42) for emergencies, acting as public professional emergency services. Inside each inspectorate for emergency situations is an operative centre for emergencies, ready to activate the emergency organization in case of an event. These operative centres for emergencies receive notification of all types of emergency, including radiation events.
In accordance with the legal provisions in their field of activity, the responsible organizations at the national level are operational and can host operative centres for emergencies. At the national level, the National Operative Centre of IGSU acts as an operational structure.
In order to fulfil the legal responsibilities in case of a nuclear accident or radiological emergency, CNCAN has established its own Emergency Response Centre, as part of the National System for the Management of Emergencies. The Emergency Response Centre also acts as a support centre performing technical analysis and prognosis of emergency situations with a focus on nuclear safety, radiation protection and radiological consequences in nuclear and radiological emergency situations.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs is also the national contact point in relation to the European Union — the ECURIE system and CNCAN are the contact points in relation to the IAEA — for early notification and assistance in the event of a nuclear accident.
Arrangements are in place in all nuclear risk areas (Cernavoda NPP; Bechet area — near Bulgaria’s Kozlodui NPP; TRIGA reactor in Pitesti — Mioveni) for prompt warning and instruction to the population in the emergency planning zone, in case of an accidental event. In the first phase of a severe accident, the operator of the nuclear facility is responsible for giving first instructions to the population in the affected area.
The protective actions for the population to be recommended by the operator are established based on the projected doses and the off-site ambient dose rates. In normal conditions, the public in the vicinity of the Cernavoda NPP and Kozlodui NPP periodically receive printed information about potential emergencies. At the local/county level, a public information group is established in case of emergency to provide information to the mass media and the population.
The on-site radiation emergency plan of the operator and the off-site radiation emergency plans of the public authorities establish the responsibilities, resources and interfaces required to inform the public in case of a nuclear emergency. Joint information centres, staffed by representatives of the nuclear facility and of the public authorities, are established at the local and national levels.
At the local level, information includes instructions and warnings for the population in the potentially affected area. CNSSU at the national level and the county committees for emergencies at the local level are responsible for giving instructions and information to the public. The local and national TV and mass media are used to keep the public informed about an accidental radiological event. At the national level, the information includes the status of the nuclear/radiological facility and the status of planning/implementing protective actions for population.
Under the coordination of CNCAN, a National Plan for Response in Case of Nuclear or Radiological Emergency has been developed and enforced. This plan makes provisions for the following stakeholders:
Government: CNCAN, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Agriculture, National Environmental Protection Agency, National Agency for Meteorology, National Veterinary and Food Safety Authority.
Operators.
Local authorities.
Technical support organization (RATEN ICN).
The above mentioned national plan includes the following stages:
Management of the nuclear or radiological response operations;
Notification and identification of an emergency and activation of the nuclear or radiological response;
Implementation of the mitigating actions;
Implementation of the preventive protective actions;
Implementation of the urgent protective actions;
Implementation of the early protective actions;
Provision of warning messages and instructions for the population;
Protection of the emergency workers;
Medical response management;
Radioactive waste management during a nuclear or radiological emergency;
Non-radiological consequence mitigation;
International cooperation;
End of the nuclear or radiological emergency.
In 2017, a national platform for reducing the risks following a disaster was implemented in Romania. The platform is multiorganizational and interdisciplinary and has a consultative role for establishing strategies and programmes for reducing risks from disasters. It addresses the risks associated with nuclear and radiological emergencies with the aim of increasing the response capacity of the National Management System for Emergency Situations.
The Cernavoda NPP On-site Radiation Emergency Plan
The Cernavoda NPP On-site Radiation Emergency Plan, along with its supporting documents, ensures effective emergency preparedness and response to emergency situations at the nuclear installations.
The emergency preparedness and response process of the Cernavoda NPP is verified and improved through a systematic programme, including quarterly, annual or general drills and exercises (once every three to four years), and simulates various conditions of a nuclear emergency subject to the initiation of the Cernavoda NPP On-site Radiation Emergency Plan.
The measures taken by the Cernavoda NPP after the Fukushima accident have included upgrading many components of the emergency preparedness and response process. Among them are the following: revision of the On-site Radiation Emergency Plan, set-up of the Work Control Area in case of severe accident (2 km from the plant), set-up of the Off-site Emergency Control Centre in Constanta (50 km from the plant) and installation of satellite phones in the primary and secondary control rooms of Units 1 and 2.
The Cernavoda NPP on-site emergency organization ensures a complete on-site response to an emergency situation and covers the off-site emergency responsibilities of the Cernavoda NPP. The responsibility for off-site emergency planning lies with the public authorities. The NPP shares some of the on-site emergency responsibilities with the public authorities, especially in the initial stages of an emergency with on-site implications.
In order to preserve the valuable, positive experience and to maintain the current emergency response arrangements with the public authorities properly qualified to address emergency response activities, SNN is promoting cooperation with the national authorities in charge, while the Cernavoda NPP engages with local authorities (Cernavoda town and Constanta county). The Cernavoda NPP has prepared and arranged two important facilities for the town of Cernavoda: the Local Emergency Centre of the Cernavoda Town Hall at the Cernavoda NPP’s Public Information Centre and the Personnel Decontamination Area within the Cernavoda town hospital.
3. NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
3.1. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
3.1.1. Regulatory authority
CNCAN represents the national competent authority in exercising regulation, licensing and control of the nuclear field in Romania, for all the activities and installations under the scope of Law No. 111 of 1996 on the safe deployment, regulation, licensing and control of nuclear activities, republished with subsequent modifications and completions.
CNCAN has all necessary legal powers to issue mandatory regulations and licences for nuclear facilities and activities and to perform evaluations, inspections and enforcement. The regulations are updated whenever needed to adhere to recent national developments and requirements for nuclear safety and radiation protection in the European Union and the IAEA.
CNCAN is a specialized governmental body with legal personality. CNCAN is a public institution of national interest, with headquarters in Bucharest, chaired by a president with the rank of State Secretary, coordinated by the Prime Minister through the General Secretariat of the Government.
CNCAN is completely separate and independent from the organizations involved in the promotion and/or production of nuclear energy, in accordance with the provisions of article 8 in the Convention on Nuclear Safety.
CNCAN has over 50 years of experience in its field of expertise and it has an important role in ensuring strict observance of the requirements for nuclear safety and radiation protection in Romania.
CNCAN has the following main responsibilities (art. 35 of Law No. 111 of 1996):
Initiates projects for normative acts in its area of competence and issues regulations in the nuclear field, consulting the other authorities with attributions in this domain, as necessary, according to the law;
Establishes dose limits for planned exposure scenarios and reference levels for existing and emergency exposure situations;
Reviews and consents to all the normative acts with implications for the nuclear field, prior to their entering into force;
Approves, within the licensing process and throughout the operating period, the radiological and nuclear emergency response plans of the licence holder;
Collaborates with the central authority for environmental protection and controls the conduct of the activities of the environmental radioactivity monitoring network;
Requests the competent authorities in the field of national security to perform the necessary checks for the persons with responsibilities in the field of nuclear activities, in compliance with the specific regulations;
Initiates, with the consent of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, activities for cooperation with the IAEA, OECD/NEA and other international organizations specialized in the nuclear field;
Performs the payment of financial obligations to international bodies and organizations in its area of competence, in accordance with the legal provisions;
Cooperates with similar institutions/authorities from other countries;
Initiates the necessary steps for the conclusion of treaties at government level in its field of competence;
Concludes treaties at departmental level in its area of competence;
Controls the application of the European legislation, the provisions of the international treaties and the national regulations on safeguards control, physical protection, illicit trafficking, transportation of nuclear and radioactive materials, protection against radiation, requirements for the nuclear management system, nuclear and radiological installations, spent fuel and radioactive waste management and planning, and preparation and response to radionuclide and nuclear emergencies;
Ensures the provision of the information in its area of competence necessary to inform the population likely to be affected, and the immediate notification of the population actually affected, of the details of the emergency, the measures to be taken, as appropriate, within the National System for the Management of Emergencies prescribed by law, in the event of a radiological or nuclear emergency;
Organizes public debates in its area of competence, according to the law;
Represents the national contact point for the regulatory control of protection against ionizing radiation, nuclear and radiological safety, radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel management, nuclear safeguards, the physical protection of materials, nuclear and radiological installations, the prevention and combating of illicit trafficking in nuclear materials, and radioactive, as well as radiological and/or nuclear emergencies;
Orders the recovery of orphan sources and coordinates the recovery activities;
Licenses the construction of nuclear constructions and exercises state control over the quality of constructions within nuclear installations, as an exception to the Law No. 50/1991 regarding the authorization of construction works, republished with subsequent amendments and completions, and Law No. 10/1995 on quality in construction, with the subsequent modifications, which will not apply to nuclear installations;
Carries out any other duties stipulated by the law, with regard to the regulation and control of nuclear activities;
Transmits notifications and submits reports to the European Commission on the implementation of the Council directives and other Community normative acts in their own area of competence, at the deadlines and at the frequency stipulated by them;
Endorses the reports on the implementation of Council directives and other nuclear regulatory acts transmitted to the European Commission by other national bodies;
Endorses the National Strategy for the Development of the Nuclear Field;
Endorses the medium and long term national strategy for the safe management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste;
Regularly organizes, at least once every 10 years, self-assessments as well as peer to peer international analyses of its own work as well as national regulatory, authorization and control frameworks; the results of these analyses shall be reported to the European Commission and the other Member States and may be made available to the public, in compliance with the applicable legal regulations on classified information and the principle of confidentiality;
Controls, in cooperation with other authorities that have, according to the law, attributions in the field, the implementation of the Existing Situation Management Strategy, approved by Government decision;
Controls the implementation of the strategy for identifying contaminated sites, in cooperation with other authorities that have, according to the law, attributions in the field;
Controls the implementation of the national action plan for addressing long-term risks from radon exposure, in cooperation with other authorities that have, according to the law, attributions in the field;
Collaborate with the Ministry of Health and other competent authorities, as appropriate, to develop a national radon action plan that is approved by government decision;
Collaborates with specialized institutes to identify areas where the annual average of radon concentration in a significant number of buildings is expected to exceed the national reference level provided for in the specific regulations issued;
Collaborates with specialized institutes to identify dwellings where the annual average radon concentration exceeds the national reference level provided for in the specific regulations issued and to establish, where appropriate, measures to reduce radon concentrations in those dwellings;
Keeps records of the legal entities holding radioactive sources under the control of CNCAN, as well as of the radioactive sources owned by them.
3.1.2. Licensing process
Law No. 111 of 1996 empowers CNCAN to issue regulations in the following areas:
Nuclear safety;
Radiological protection;
Quality assurance;
Non-proliferation of nuclear weapons;
Physical protection of nuclear facilities and materials;
Transport of radioactive and nuclear materials;
Management of radioactive waste and spent fuel;
Emergency preparedness and intervention in case of a nuclear accident;
Manufacturing of products and supply of services for nuclear installations;
Any other regulations necessary for the licensing and control of nuclear facilities and activities.
CNCAN is responsible for ensuring, through the regulations issued and the dispositions arising from the licensing and control (evaluation, inspection and enforcement) procedures that an adequate framework is in place for the deployment of activities under the scope of the law.
The current licensing practice is based on the provisions of Law No. 111 of 1996 and of the regulations issued by CNCAN.
The detailed regulatory requirements, as well as the assessment and inspection criteria used by CNCAN in the licensing process, are derived from a number of sources, such as:
Romanian regulations;
Limits and conditions specified in the different licences;
IAEA Safety Standards and guides;
Other international standards, guides and recommendations, including regulatory documents developed in other jurisdictions;
Applicable standards and codes;
Licensing basis documentation produced by the licensee and approved or accepted by CNCAN (e.g. safety analysis reports, design manuals, reference documents, station instructions, operating manuals, technical basis documents).
The licences for nuclear installations are granted to legal persons, at their request, if they prove compliance with the provisions of the law and specific regulations issued by CNCAN. Authorizations are requested and issued, respectively, simultaneously or sequentially, separately for each type of activity or for each nuclear or radiological facility with its own functionalityor for each distinct type of radioactive material, ionizing radiation generator, device for dosimetric control of ionizing radiation or the degree of radioactive contamination, material or device used for the purpose of protection against ionizing radiation, containerization or transport means specially designed for that purpose which the applicant for the manufacturing authorization intends to carry out, for the purpose of use or sale.
As stated in the law, the licences shall be issued for the following phases: design, siting, production, construction and/or montage, commissioning, trial operation, operation, repair and/or maintenance (as major refurbishment), modification (as major upgrades), preservation and decommissioning, closing down, post-closure control.
In accordance with the provisions of the law, CNCAN is empowered to request from the licensees, or from the applicants for a licence, all the documentation needed for the regulatory decision making process on safety related matters. The documentation that needs to be submitted to CNCAN for review and approval is usually specified in the regulations, licence conditions, regulatory letters and inspection reports.
Additional support documentation is requested on a case by case basis and specified in regulatory letters, minutes of meetings between CNCAN staff and licensee’s representatives, and the like. In addition to the review of the documentation, CNCAN verifies the claims made by the applicant through audits, inspections, licensing meetings and a system of witness points and hold points.
According to the law, the licensees and applicants have the obligation of facilitating CNCAN inspections and providing access to documentation and any other information requested by CNCAN. The general roles, authority and responsibilities of CNCAN inspectors are set in the law. The key objective of the CNCAN inspection programme is to monitor compliance with the legal, regulatory and licensing requirements, and to take enforcement action in the event of non-compliance.
Source: www.cncan.ro.
3.2. NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN NUCLEAR POWER
Currently, the main national laws and regulations governing the activities in the field of peaceful use of atomic energy in Romania include the following:
Law No. 111 of 10 October 1996 on the safe deployment, regulation, authorization and control of nuclear activities, republished with subsequent modifications and completions.
Law No. 703 of 3 December 2001 on civil liability for nuclear damage, with subsequent modifications and completions.
Governmental Decision No. 894 of 2003 for approval of the norms for application of the provisions of Law No. 703 of 2001 on civil liability for nuclear damages.
Government Decision No. 437 of 30 April 2002 on the establishment of the Interdepartmental Commission for the resumption of the works and completion of the Cernavoda nuclear power plant Unit 3, as amended by Government Decision No. 957 of 22 August 2007 (including Unit 4).
Government Ordinance No. 7 of 30 January 2003 on the use of nuclear energy for exclusively peaceful purposes, as amended by Law No. 57 of 17 March 2006.
Government Ordinance No. 11 of 30 January 2003 on the safe management of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, as amended by Government Ordinance No. 31 of 2006. Republished in accordance with Law No. 26 of 2007. Amended by Law No. 378 of 19 December 2013.
Government Decision No. 890 of 29 July 2003 approving the Road Map for Energy in Romania.
Government Decision No. 1568 of 18 December 2003 regarding the amount of direct annual contribution of nuclear permit holders and the deadline for their payments.
Government Decision No. 729 of 20 September 2018 on organization and functioning of the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control.
Government Urgency Ordinance No. 195 of 22 December 2005 on environmental protection, approved by Law No. 265 of 29 June 2006, with subsequent modifications and completions.
Government Decision No. 643 of 20 June 2007 regarding the approval of the strategy for selecting the investors for the completion of Cernavoda nuclear power plant Units 3 and 4, as amended by Government Decision No. 691 of 24 June 2008.
Government Decision No. 1069 of 5 September 2007 on approval of the Romanian Energy Strategy for 2007–2020.
Government Decision No. 1080 of 5 September 2007 on the setting up and management of financial resources required for the safe management of radioactive waste and decommissioning of nuclear and radiological facilities.
Law No. 101 of 15 June 2011 for the prevention and punishment of acts involving damage to the environment.
Government Decision No. 526 of 25 July 2018 for approval of the National Radon Action Plan.
Government Decision No. 600 of 23 July 2014 for approval of the National Nuclear Safety and Security Strategy.
Lower level of safety regulations (standards, rules, safety guides)
CNCAN is empowered by Law No. 111 of 1996 to develop mandatory and enforceable regulations in order to detail the general legal requirements, as well as any other regulations necessary to support the licensing and control of nuclear activities. CNCAN issued regulations in the following areas:
Radiological safety rules;
Nuclear safety guidelines;
Joint nuclear interdepartmental norms;
Nuclear safeguards;
Physical protection rules in the nuclear field;
Radioactive mining standards;
Radioactive material transport;
Radioactive waste management;
Quality management standards in the nuclear field;
Rules on radiological emergency management;
Rules on natural radiation sources;
Rules on the preparation and certification of nuclear personnel;
Nuclear construction norms;
Cybersecurity rules for nuclear;
Details are given on the related CNCAN web site: www.cncan.ro.
REFERENCES
APPENDIX 1: INTERNATIONAL, MULTILATERAL AND BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
International treaties, conventions, and agreements signed/ratified by the country and cooperation agreements with the IAEA in the area of nuclear power
Title | In Force | National adoption/ratification/acceptance |
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), adopted at New York on 12 June 1968, signed in Moscow, London and Washington on 1 July 1968 | 3 May 1970 | Ratified by Decree No. 21 of 1970, published in the Official Bulletin No. 3/31.01.1970 |
Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and under Water, done in Moscow on 5 August 1963, signed at Moscow, London and Washington on 8 August 1963 | 10 October 1963 | Ratified by Decree No. 686 of 1963, published in the Official Bulletin No. 20/31.10.1963 |
Treaty on the Prohibition of the Emplacement of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction on the Seabed and Ocean Floor and in the Subsoil Thereof (Seabed Treaty), adopted and opened for signature at Moscow, London and Washington at 11 February 1971 | 18 May 1972 | Ratified by Decree No. 141 of 1972, published in the Official Bulletin No. 48/08.05.1972 |
Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty — CTBT, Vienna, adopted by UNGA 10 September 1996, opened for signature on 24 September 1996 | Not in force | Ratified by Law No. 152 of 1999, published in the Official Bulletin No. 478/04.10.1999 |
Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, signed in Luxembourg on 25 April 2005 | 1 January 2007 | Ratified by Law No. 157 of 2005, published in the Official Bulletin No. 465/01.06.2005 |
Agreement between Belgium, Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the European Community of Atomic Energy and the International Atomic Energy Agency in implementation of Article III, (1) and (4) of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (78/164/EURATOM) adopted in Brussels on 5 April 1973, with subsequent amendments | 21 February 1977 | Ratified by Law No. 185 of 2007 published in the Official Bulletin No. 467/11.07.2007 |
Protocol additional to the Agreement between Belgium, Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the European Community of Atomic Energy and the International Atomic Energy Agency in implementation of Article III, (1) and (4) of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, signed in Vienna on 22 September 1998 | 30 April 2004 | Ratified by Law No. 185 of 2007 published in the Official Bulletin No. 467/11.07.2007 |
Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Atomic Energy Agency, approved by the Board of Governors on 1 July 1959 | 7 October 1970 | Acceptance: 7 October 1970 |
Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, adopted in Vienna on 26 October 1979 | 8 February 1987 | Ratified by Law No. 78 of 1993, published in the Official Bulletin No. 265/15.11.1993 |
Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, adopted in Vienna on 8 July 2005 | 8 May 2016 | Ratified by Law No. 419 of 2006, published in the Official Bulletin No. 1008/19.12.2006 |
Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, adopted in Vienna on 21 May 1963 | 12 November 1977 | Accessed by Law No. 106 of 1992, published in the Official Bulletin No. 258/15.10.1992 |
Joint Protocol Relating to the Application of the Vienna Convention and the Paris Convention, adopted in Vienna on 21 September 1988 | 27 April 1992 | Accessed by Law No. 106 of 1992, published in the Official Bulletin No. 258/15.10.1992 |
Protocol to Amend the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, adopted in Vienna on 12 September 1997 | 4 October 2003 | Ratified by Law No. 203 of 1998, published in the Official Bulletin No. 438/18.11.1998 |
Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage, adopted in Vienna on 12 September 1997 | 15 April 2015 | Ratified by Law No. 5 of 1999, published in the Official Bulletin No. 9/18.01.1999 |
Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, adopted in Vienna on 26 September 1986 | 27 October 1986 | Accessed by Decree No. 223 of 1990, published in the Official Bulletin No. 67/14.05.1990. |
Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, adopted in Vienna on 26 September 1986 | 27 February 1987 | Accessed by Decree No. 223 of 1990, published in the Official Bulletin No. 67/14.05.1990. |
Convention on Nuclear Safety, adopted in Vienna on 17 June 1994 | 24 October 1996 | Ratified by Law No. 43 of 1995, published in the Official Bulletin No. 104/29.05.1995 |
Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, adopted in Vienna on 5 September 1997 | 18 June 2001 | Ratified by Law No. 105 of 1999, published in the Official Bulletin No. 283/21.06.1999 |
Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo Convention) | 10 September 1997 | Ratified by Law No. 22 of 2001, published in the Official Bulletin No.105/01.03.2001 |
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) | 30 October 2001 | Ratified by Law No. 86 of 2000, published in the Official Bulletin No. 224/22.05.2000 |
Bilateral agreements with other countries or organizations signed/ratified by the country in the field of nuclear power
Nr. crt. | Title | Date of entry into force at national level | National adoption/ratification |
1 | Agreement between the Socialist Republic of Romania and the Government of Canada for Cooperation in the Development and Use of Atomic Energy for Peaceful Purposes, done in Ottawa on 24 October 1977 and Exchange of Notes between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Romania constituting an Agreement Amending their Agreement for Cooperation in the Development and Application of Atomic Energy for Peaceful Purposes done at Ottawa on 24 October 1977 | Approved by Decree No. 64 of 1978, not published in the Official Bulletin Upon accession, only some provisions remain in force (those which are not overlapping with the Agreement between the Government of Canada and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, done at Brussels on 6 October 1959 and its subsequent amendments | |
2 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of Greece on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident and Exchange of Information on Nuclear Installations, signed in Athens on 10 March 1995 | Entered into force on 25 May 1998 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 332 of 1995, published in the Official Bulletin No. 99/23.05.1995 |
3 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of Republic of Hungary on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, signed in Bucharest on 26 May 1997 | Entered into force on 03 October 1997 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 541 of 1997, published in the Official Bulletin No. 265/03.10.1997 |
4 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of Republic of Bulgaria on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident and Exchange of Information on Nuclear Installations, signed in Kozlodui on 28 May 1997 | Entered into force on 25 November 1997 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 734 of 1997, published in the Official Bulletin No. 326/25.11.1997 |
5 | Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Romania Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Counterproliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Promotion of Defence and Military Relations, signed at Washington 30 March 1998 | Entered into force on 3 June 1999 | Ratified by Law No. 100 of 1999 for approving the Ordinance No. 3 of 1999, published in the Official Bulletin No. 255/03.06.1999 |
6 | Protocol for amending and completing the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Romania Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Counterproliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Promotion of Defence and Military Relations, signed at Washington 30.03.1998, signed at Bucharest on 5 July 2012 | Entered into force on 5 July 2012 | Ratified by Urgency Ordinance No. 42 of 2012, published in the Official Bulletin No. 452/05.07.2012, approved by Law No. 201 of 2012 |
7 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of the Slovak Republic on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident and Exchange of Information on Nuclear Installations, signed in Bucharest on 19 February 2002 | Entered into force on 14 May 2002 | Approved Governmental Decision No. 422 of 2002, published in the Official Bulletin No. 319/14.05.2002 |
8 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of the Russian Federation on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident and Exchange of Information on Nuclear Installations, signed in Moscow on 21 February 2002 | Entered into force on 15 May 2002 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 423 of 2002, published in the Official Bulletin No. 322/15.05.2002 |
9 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization on the Conduct of Activities, including Post-certification Activities, Relating to International Monitoring Facilities for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, signed in Vienna on 13 June 2003 | Entered into force on 1 October 2003 | Ratified by the Law No. 372 of 20.09.2004, published in the Official Bulletin No. 884/28.09.2004 |
10 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on Early Notification of Nuclear Accidents and Exchange of Information in the Field of Nuclear and Radiation Safety, signed in Vienna on 22 September 2004 | Entered into force on 29 December 2004 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 2188 of 2004, published in the Official Bulletin No. 1267/29.12.2004 |
11 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of Turkey on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, signed in Bucharest on 3 March 2008 | Entered into force on 12 September 2008 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 1038 of 2008, published in the Official Bulletin No. 650/12.09.2008 |
12 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of the Russian Federation Concerning Cooperation for the Transfer of Research Reactor Irradiated Nuclear Fuel to the Russian Federation, signed in Bucharest on 19 February 2009 | Entered into force on 15 June 2009 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 664 of 2009, published in the Official Bulletin No. 405/15.06.2009 |
13 | Agreement between the Government of Romania and the Government of Argentina for the Cooperation in Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy, signed in Buenos Aires on 27 November 1990 | Entered into force on 16 August 1993 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 354 of 1993, published in the Official Bulletin No. 196/16.08.1993 |
14 | Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation and Exchange of Information in Nuclear Safety between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and the Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority, signed in Bucharest on 12 June 1997 | Entered into force on 25 May 1998 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 273 of 19.05.1998, published in the Official Bulletin No. 192/25.05.1998 |
15 | Agreement between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and the Greek Atomic Energy Commission of the Republic of Greece for Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident and Exchange of Information on Nuclear Installations, signed in Bucharest on 22 December 1997 | Entered into force on 25 May 1998 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 271 of 19.05.1998, published in the Official Bulletin No. 192/25.05.1998 |
16 | Agreement on Cooperation and Information Exchange in the Field of Nuclear Safety between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and the Gesellschaft fur Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (Grs) Mbh, signed in Berlin on 10 November 1998 | Entered into force on 23 February 1999 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 94 of 18.02.1999, published in the Official Bulletin No. 75/23.02.1999 |
17 | Arrangement between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control (CNCAN) of Romania and the National Commission for Atomic Energy of the Republic of Argentina, signed in Bucharest on 15 July 1999 | Entered into force on 3 February 2000 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 61/27.01.2000, published in the Official Bulletin No. 53/03.02.2000 |
18 | Administrative Understanding between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and the Atomic Energy Control Board of Canada, signed in Bucharest on 29 May 2000 and in Ottawa on 23 May 2000 | Entered into force on 6 November 2000 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 1011/2000, published in the Official Bulletin No. 547/06.11.2000 |
19 | Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation and Exchange of Information in Nuclear Regulatory Matters between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, signed in Vienna on 22 September 2010 | Entered into force on 8 December 2010 | Approved by CNCAN President Order No. 327 of 2010, published in the Official Bulletin No. 819/08.12.2010 |
20 | Agreement between the Nuclear Agency of Romania and the National Commission for Nuclear Activities of Romania and the Department of Energy of the United States of America Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Countering the Proliferation of Nuclear Materials and Technologies, signed in New York on 19 July 2004 | Entered into force on 1 March 2005 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 97 of 2005, published in the Official Bulletin No. 178/01.03.2005 |
21 | Amendment to the Agreement between the Nuclear Agency of Romania and the National Commission for Nuclear Activities of Romania and the Department of Energy of the United States of America Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Countering the Proliferation of Nuclear Materials and Technologies, signed in Washington on 3 December 2008 | Entered into force on 22 May 2009 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 555/2009, published in the Official Bulletin No. 344/22.05.2009 |
22 | Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation in Nuclear Safety between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, signed in Bucharest on 21 September 1996 | Entered into force on 11 November 1996 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 1032 of 1996, published in the Official Bulletin No. 282/11.11.1996 |
23 | Additional Arrangement to the Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation in Nuclear Safety between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, signed in Daejeon on 1 December 2006 | Entered into force on 9 March 2007 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 215 of 2007, published in the Official Bulletin No. 167/ 09.03.2007. |
24 | Arrangement between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control (CNCAN) of Romania and the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) of the Republic of Italy for Cooperation in Nuclear and Radiation Safety Matters, signed in Vienna on 14 September 2009 | Entered into force on 6 April 2011 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 311 of 2011, published in the Official Bulletin No. 241/06.04.2011 |
25 | Agreement between the Department of Energy of the United States of America and the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania Concerning Cooperation to Enhance the Security of Romania’s Radioactive Sources and Special Nuclear Material, signed in Bucharest on 10 December 2009 | Entered into force on 24 February 2010 | Approved by CNCAN Presidential Order No. 363 of 2009, published in the Official Bulletin No. 127/24.02.2010 |
26 | Memorandum of Understanding for the Development of Modes of Cooperation of the Authorities Relating to the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material for Civil Purposes, signed in Bucharest on 16 July 2010 and in London on 21 July 2010 | Entered into force on 10 December 2010 | Approved by CNCAN President Order No. 326 of 2010, published in the Official Bulletin No. 827/10.12.2010 |
27 | Memorandum of Understanding between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and the Radiation Safety Directorate of the Republic of Macedonia for Cooperation on Radiation Protection Regulation Matters, signed in Bucharest on 26 October 2010 | Entered into force on 8 December 2010 | Approved by CNCAN President Order No. 328 of 2010, published in the Official Bulletin No. 819/08.12.2010 |
28 | Arrangement between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania (CNCAN) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of the United States of America (NRC) for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in Nuclear Safety Matters, signed in Bucharest on 2 March 2017 and in Rockville, Maryland, on 16 March 2017 | Entered into force on 27 July 2017 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 504 of 20.07.2017, published in the Official Bulletin No. 608/27.07.2017 |
29 | Memorandum of Understanding between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania and the National Agency for Regulating Nuclear and Radiological Activities of Republic of Moldova in the Area of Radiological Safety and Practices with Ionizing Radiation Sources, signed in Bucharest on 12 December 2011 | Entered into force on 22 August 2012 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 836 of 2012, published in the Official Bulletin No. 601/22.08.2012 |
30 | Memorandum of Understanding between the President of the National Atomic Energy Agency of the Republic of Poland and the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control of Romania for Cooperation and Exchange of Information in Nuclear Regulatory Matters, signed in Vienna on 25 September 2014 | Entered into force on 28 October 2014 | Approved by CNCAN Presidential Order No. 176 of 2014, published in the Official Bulletin No. 783/28.10.2014 |
31 | Arrangement between the National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control (CNCAN) from Romania and the Nuclear Regulatory Agency from the Republic of Bulgaria (NRA) for the Exchange of Technical Information and Cooperation in the Regulation and Control of Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection, signed in Sofia on 20 January 2016 | Entered into force on 18 May 2016 | Approved by Governmental Decision No. 343 of 2016, published in the Official Bulletin No. 379/18.05.2016 |
32 | Law no 236/2016 on ratifying the Protocol between the Government of Romania and the Government of Canada, signed in Bucharest at 31 July 2015 additional to the Agreement between the Government of Socialist Republic of Romania and the Government of Canada for the cooperation in development and peaceful use of atomic energy, signed in Ottawa on 24 September 1977 | Entered into force on 7 December 2016 | Approved by Law 236/2016, published in the Official Bulletin no 982/7.12.2016 |
APPENDIX 2: MAIN ORGANIZATIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND COMPANIES INVOLVED IN NUCLEAR POWER RELATED ACTIVITIES
Ministry of Economy
Ministry of Energy
Ministry of Environment
National Institute of Statistics
Romanian Energy Regulatory Authority
Regia Autonoma Tehnologii pentru Energia Nucleara (RATEN)
Nuclear Agency and for Radioactive Waste
National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control
Societatea Nationala ‘Nuclearelectrica’ SA
Cernavoda Nuclear Power Plant, subsidiary of Societatea Nationala ‘Nuclearelectrica’ SA
Romanian Gas and Electricity Market
Transelectrica SA
SC Electrica SA
Institute for Nuclear Research Pitesti ICN Pitesti
Centre of Technology and Engineering for Nuclear Projects CITON
National R&D Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies, ICSI Rm Valcea
National Uranium Company CNU
Suceava Branch, Crucea Botusana Mines
National Uranium Company CNU
Feldioara Branch
Nuclear Fuel Plant FCN Pitesti
General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations
National Institute for Public Health
Coordinator information
Name of report coordinator: Georgiana Ramona Popescu,
Section Head for Technical International Collaboration
Email: ramona.popescu@agentianucleara.ro / ramona.popescu@andr.ro
Institution: Nuclear Agency and for Radioactive Waste, ANDR
Contact details: 21–25 Mendeleev Str., District 1, 010362 Bucharest, Romania