During the past 30 years, Chile’s energy policy has been based on open, competitive markets. Within this framework, the State plays a regulatory role, and its entrepreneurial activities are limited. It is presumed that the market will provide adequate security of supply⁽¹⁾. However, one of the lessons of the global energy reality — marked by the gradual exhaustion of fossil fuels, increasing concern about security of supply and problems associated with climate change — is that the market alone is not able to address new challenges, and that a more proactive role by the State is needed to reconcile energy and competitiveness objectives with those of security and sustainability.

In addition to local energy issues, there are a number of external challenges to be addressed, particularly concerning climate change. This concern has led a number of countries to make commitments with regards to their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to develop policies to mitigate these emissions. Given Chile’s increasing economic and political interaction with the world, it is quite probable that Chile will not only face demands to implement emissions mitigation actions, but also to tailor its export business to reduce its “carbon footprint” to the rest of the world or similar mechanisms.

Bearing in mind these challenges, the government has implemented a series of measures designed to promote the development of non-conventional renewable energy (NCRE)⁽²⁾ and energy efficiency⁽³⁾. These measures not only address global environmental problems, but are also in line with the explicit government objectives. These objectives increase energy security by diversifying sources, to reduce external dependence, to increase the sustainability of the energy mix and to increase equal access to energy.

In May 2014, the president of Chile presented the Energy Agenda as a road map for the development of government actions in this area, which established as one of its tasks “the design and execution of a long-term Energy Policy with social, political, and technical validation.” To that end, two horizons were identified: one short term and one medium- and long term. The first was to discuss the work areas in terms of the standards, policies and regulations that will guarantee the technical feasibility and sustainability of the energy matrix. The second was to discuss strategic and technological aspects that will define the energy matrix that Chile will promote from now until 2050.

In the context of the Energy Agenda, a discussion process was developed that included key stakeholders from the public sector, industry, academia, civil society, the regions of the country and the general public. The goal was to develop the country’s long term Energy Policy. An advisory committee led by the Minister of Energy and composed of key participants from the sector was convened with regional and national representation. The members form part of various ministries and public institutions, trade associations, civil society and Chilean universities. In recent years, the committee evaluated the proposed “Road Map for 2050: Towards Sustainable and Inclusive Energy for Chile.” The road map contains the key items to be considered by the energy policy in the long term.

Furthermore, a public consultation process was conducted in regards to the energy policy document. The process yielded over 400 comments that varied in scope and perspective. In addition, five regional workshops were conducted in Santiago, Calama, Puerto Montt, La Serena, and Concepción; they were attended by approximately 420 people from different areas of society who are interested in the energy sector. The comments collected during the public consultation process and at the regional workshops served as important inputs for the drafting of this policy.

In December 2015, the Government published the document Energy 2050: Chile’s Energy Policy. The energy policy proposes a vision of Chile’s energy sector by the year 2050 as being reliable, inclusive, competitive and sustainable. This vision is part of a systemic approach in which the main goal is to achieve and maintain the reliability of the entire energy system while meeting sustainability and inclusion criteria and contributing to the competitiveness of the nation’s economy. In order to make this vision a reality by 2050, the energy policy is sustained by four pillars: Quality and Security of Supply, Energy as a Driver of Development, Environmentally friendly Energy, and Energy Efficiency and Energy Education. The proposed measures and action plans shall be developed on the basis of these pillars between now and the year 2050.

Fig. 1. Four pillars of the energy policy.

• Pillar 1: Quality and Security of Supply

  a. Security and Flexibility of Centralized Production

  b. Decentralized Production and Active Management of Demand

• Pillar 2: Energy as a Driving Force for Development

  a. Inclusive Energy Development

  b. Equitable access to Energy Services and Quality of Life

  c. Territorial Inclusiveness

  d. Competitiveness in the Energy Sector

• Pillar 3: Environmentally friendly Energy

  a. Renewable Energy Matrix

  b. Local Externalities

  c. Energy and Climate Change

• Pillar 4: Energy Efficiency and Energy Education

  a. Energy Efficiency

  b. Education and Energy Culture

Regarding nuclear energy, Energy 2050 notes: “Despite the fact that Chile’s Energy Policy does not exclude a priori any generation technology, nuclear energy has not been included as a short-term option, because it requires research on key issues, such as its long-term economic viability in the face of various legal and market conditions, and the legal and institutional amendments required, among others. This research should be directed by the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, CCHEN) by drawing on competent national agencies. The next evaluation process of Chile’s long-term Energy Policy will review the appropriateness of incorporating this technology into the electricity generation matrix”.

The current government will not make any decisions regarding the use of nuclear energy to generate electricity. However, according to Energy 2050, it is responsible and necessary to continue the studies and technical exchanges with developed countries to allow future governments to take a stand on this matter, with the participation of an adequately informed society.

TABLE 1. ESTIMATED AVAILABLE ENERGY SOURCES

	Estimated available energy sources
	Fossil Fuels			Nuclear	Renewables
	Solid1	Liquid2	Gas3	Uranium4	Hydro5	Other
						Renewable6
Total amount in specific units*	635.00	1.98	9,003.00	748	0.01	1.85
Total amount in exajoule (EJ)	9.57	0.08	0.35	0.409	—	—
* Solid: Million tonne; Liquid, Gas: Million m3; Uranium: Metric tonnes; Hydro, Renewable: TW.
** light water reactor open cycle assumption.
***CNE estimates. Includes geothermal, wind power, biomass and small-scale hydraulic energy(<20MW).
—: data not available. Source: Energy Policy: New Guidelines (National Energy Commission, 2008).

Sources:

¹ Ministry of Energy of Chile.

², ³ ENAP and CEOP.

⁴ Reasonably Assured Resources (RAR) under < USD 260/kgU, Uranium 2014, Resources, Production and Demand (“Red Book”).

⁵ Hydropower: technically exploitable capability, the amount of the gross theoretical capability that can be exploited within the limits of current technology, National Energy Commission (CNE).

⁶ Energy Policy: New Guidelines, CNE 2008. NCRE: potential for electricity generation.

TABLE 2. ENERGY STATISTICS

	1980	1990	2000	2010	2013	2014	2015	Compound Annual Growth Rate (%) 2000 to 2015
Energy Consumption**
Total	0.418	0.599	1.054	1.343	1.718	1.586	1.585	3.4
Solids***	0.052	0.110	0.134	0.203	0.316	0.322	0.315	9.0
Liquids	0.222	0.286	0.488	0.661	0.724	0.704	0.661	2.4
Gases	0.044	0.060	0.185	0.188	0.191	0.158	0.203	0.6
Nuclear	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Hydro	0.026	0.032	0.069	0.090	0.071	0.083	0.085	1.5
Other Renewables****	0.074	0.111	0.178	0.200	0.416	0.319	0.321	5.4
Energy Production
Total	0.304	0.339	0.368	0.375	0.604	0.575	0.566	3.6
Solids***	0.027	0.064	0.011	0.010	0.064	0.122	0.092	49.1
Liquids	0.069	0.039	0.012	0.010	0.016	0.020	0.011	–0.6
Gases	0.107	0.092	0.095	0.076	0.038	0.031	0.055	–2.8
Nuclear	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Hydro	0.027	0.033	0.072	0.079	0.071	0.084	0.085	1.2
Other Renewables****	0.074	0.111	0.178	0.200	0.416	0.318	0.323	5.4
Net import (Import-Export)
Total

** Energy consumption = primary energy consumption + net import (import–export) of secondary energy.

*** Solid fuels include coal, lignite.

****Renewables include biomass, wind, biogas.

Source: Chilean Energy Balance (National Energy Commission — www.cne.cl ).

The Chilean electricity sector was a global pioneer in establishing competitive conditions in the generation and sale of electricity, maintaining the transmission and distribution segments under a system of financial regulation. In addition, private investment in generation, transmission and distribution assets led to significant expansion in the capacity of each of the electricity systems, thus satisfying the maximum demand of the country.

The main decision making organizations in the electricity sector are described below:

• The powers related to the design of policies, legal and regulatory provisions, plans and programs become the responsibility of the Ministry of Energy, which governs the country’s energy sector.

• The Ministry’s highest authority is the Minister of Energy. Internal administration and coordination of public energy services is the responsibility of the Undersecretary of Energy (www.energia.gob.cl).

• The following services report to the Ministry of Energy: National Energy Commission, Superintendence of Electricity and Fuels, and Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission.

• CNE (National Energy Commission) is a decentralized and independent public service in charge of technical and economic regulation of the energy sector. It has four main roles: to study and propose regulations; to calculate regulated prices; to provide technical advice to the government; and to technically oversee the sector (www.cne.cl).

• SEC (Superintendence of Electricity and Fuels) function is to supervise and control the fulfilment of the legal framework provisions for the generation, production, transportation, distribution and storage of liquid fuels, gas and electricity according to the technical quality framework applied to the customers (users) and to the operations and use of the energetic resources, to ensure that this is not a risk to people or things (Law 18.410 Fuel and Electricity Superintendence (www.sec.cl)).

• CCHEN (Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission) has the mission to assist the Government in all affairs related to nuclear energy, dealing with problems related to the production, purchase, transfer, transportation and the peaceful uses of atomic energy and of the fertile, fissionable and radioactive material (www.cchen.cl).

For transparency and equal access to the electricity in free-market pricing for contracts with large clients and distribution companies, the prices, called Long Term Node Prices, are determined every six months by the National Energy Commission, which simulates the expected operation of the system and calculates prices as an average anticipated marginal cost for a forty-eight-month window.

Currently, the Chilean electrical system is 100% privately owned. The Government has a supervisory and regulatory role, through the Ministry of Energy by the CNE and the SEC. The generation segment is dominated by Enel, Colbun, Gener (AES), Engie and others. The largest provider of transmission grid is Transelect. The main distributors are ENEL Distribución, Compańía General de Electricidad S.A. (CGE) Distribution, Chilquinta Energy, Sociedad Austral de Electricidad (Saesa), and others (see Figure 2).

There is central planning at the generation level but it is only indicative because the projects are developed and determined by private actors.

Fig. 2. Structure of the Chilean electricity market and regulation.

The current network regulation of the sector is non-discriminatory, and three party access is applied on the Chilean network. Network operators are required to provide connection to any generator who has complied with current regulations, including environmental, technical standards and construction regulations.

End user prices (energy retail prices) are comprised of regulated distribution charges, a wholesale price and relevant transmission charges. However, the regulation allows consumers with installed power of higher than 500 kW to choose the category of tariff (free or regulated).

The market is structured around three prices — spot (generators), free (large consumers), and regulated (not large consumers).

Current legislation establishes as a basic premise that tariffs must represent the actual costs of generation, transmission and distribution of electricity associated with an efficient operation, in order to deliver the appropriate signals to both companies and consumers and obtain an optimum development of electrical systems.

One of the general criteria is the freedom of prices in those segments where conditions of competition are observed. Thus, end users whose connected power is less than or equal to 5,000 kW are considered sectors where the characteristics of the market are of natural monopoly and therefore, the Law establishes that they are affected by regulation of prices. Alternatively, for supplies to end users whose connected power exceeds 5,000 kW, the Act provides for price freedom, implying negotiating capacity and the possibility of providing electricity in other ways, such as self-generation or direct supply from generating companies. The first group of customers is called a regulated customer and the second is called a free customer, although customers with a connected power of more than 500 kW can choose which regime to register with (free or regulated) for a period of 4 years.

In electrical systems whose size exceeds 1,500 kW in installed generation capacity, the Law distinguishes two price levels subject to fixation:

Prices at the generation-transport level, called “node prices”, are defined for all generation-transport substations from which the supply is made. The knot prices will have two components: energy price and peak power price.

Prices at the distribution level, will be determined on the basis of the sum of the node price, established at the point of connection with the distribution facilities, an added value for distribution and a single charge or toll for the use of the trunk transmission system.

Generators can market their power and power in one of the following markets:

• Large consumer market, at a freely agreed price;

• Market of distribution companies, at node price, in the case of electricity destined to regulated price customers;

• The Economic Dispatch Centre of the respective system (CDEC), at marginal hourly cost.

The regulatory framework in the Chilean electricity sector has been in place for almost three decades. This has enabled the development of an industry with a high level of participation of private capital. The General Law on Electric Power Services: DFL No 1 of 1982, whose text is included under DFL N°4-2006, contains the main amendments thereto:

• “Short Law 1”, introduced new regulation applicable to the transmission system, development of the transmission system and the rates transmission facility owners can charge to users of the system and regulation concerning reliability and ancillary services.

• “Short Law 2”, of energy supply bids to regulate customers through long term contracts, up to 15 years. These contracts are indexed to consumer price index (CPI) of the United States of America and other relevant fuel indexes.

• Law No. 20,257, an amendment to the Chilean Electricity Law enacted in 2008. This amendment promotes the use of non-conventional renewable energies (“NCRE”). The law defines the different types of technologies considered to be NCRE. Under this law, power generation companies are required to supply 5% of their total contractual obligations entered into after 31 August 2007 for the period between 2010 and 2014 with NCRE. The obligation to supply electricity with NCRE will increase by 0.5% annually until 2024, when the requirement will reach 10% of total contractual obligations.

• “General Environmental Law” (No. 19,300), regulates and establishes the environmental framework in Chile. This law was amended early in 2009 by Law No. 20,417, which changed the environmental regulation that had existed so far. Among the main changes is the creation of the Environmental Ministry, the Environmental Superintendence as well as the Environmental Courts and the Biodiversity and Protected Wild Areas Service. Among the main modifications is the reformulation of the fines.

• Law No. 20,936. Establishes a new system of electrical transmission and creates an independent coordinating body of the national electrical system. The operation of electrical installations interconnected with each other shall be coordinated in order to:

1. Preserve the safety of the service in the electrical system;

2. Guarantee the most economic operation for all the electrical system installations; and

3. Guarantee open access to all transmission systems available in the Library of Congress of Chile (www.leychile.cl) document generated on 22 July 2016, in conformity to this law.

This coordination shall be carried out through the Coordinator, in accordance with the technical standards determined by the Commission, this law and the pertinent regulations. In addition, the Coordinator shall carry out the programming of the operation of medium-sized systems in which there is more than one generating company, in accordance with the law, regulations and technical standards. These companies should be subject to this programming of the Coordinator. The Coordinator may only directly operate the systemic control, communication and monitoring facilities necessary for the coordination of the electrical system.

• Water rights are governed by the “Código de Aguas” (“Water Code”), which defines the means by which water rights may be obtained, the characteristics of water rights and how such rights may be constituted and exercised. Water rights are granted by the Water Management Board (“Dirección General de Aguas or “DGA”). The Water Code dates back 50 years and was last modified in 2005.

The Chilean electrical grid has four separate systems, widely distributed throughout the country. They are the Far North Interconnected System (SING) in the north, Central Interconnected System (SIC) in the central and southern zone of the country, and Aysen Electrical System and Magallanes Electrical System, located in the extreme south of Chile.

Following is a brief explanation of the two main electrical systems:

• SING — The Norte Grande Interconnected System: goes through the First and Second Regions of Chile and covers an area of 185,142 km², which is equivalent to 24.5% of the continental territory. As of 31 December 2015, it reached a capacity of 3,968 MW and its supply coverage reaches close to 9% of the population.

• SIC — The Central Interconnected System: consists of transmission systems and generation plants which operate interconnectedly, from Rada de Paposo (Paposo Roadsted) in the north (Second Region of the country) to Isla Grande de Chiloé (Big Island of Chiloé) in the south (Tenth Region.) This system is the largest of the four electrical systems providing energy to Chile. As of 31 December 2015, it reached a capacity of 15,616 MW, and its supply coverage reaches close to 90% of the population.

At present, the electrical systems SIC and SING have independent operators called the Economic Load Dispatch Centre (CDEC), denoted CDEC-SIC and CDEC-SING, respectively. These CDECs have based their operation on the regulatory framework and electrical service quality standards in order to ensure correct operation of the system in terms of voltage, frequency and dispatch of generating units at the lowest marginal cost available in the spot market. Reference prices for the sector are fixed twice a year. Currently, the Minister of Energy sets the tariff decrees for different segments and the expansion decrees through the CNE. On the other hand, an expert panel resolves disagreements among electricity sector companies, and between the companies and the CNE.

However, both of these electrical systems will be interconnected by 2018, becoming a new national electric system. When the current systems of the Norte Grande and the south centre of the country are unified, these will be controlled by the recently created National Electrical Coordinator, which will replace the current CDECs. The electrical coordinator is an autonomous non-profit corporation of public law , with its own equity and indefinite duration. The organization, composition, functions and attributions are governed by the provisions of Law No. 20,936 and its regulations.

The coordinator is not part of the State administration, therefore the general or special provisions, dictated for the public sector, are not applicable unless expressly mentioned. However, the directors, the executive director and their staff shall be qualified as public employees only for the purpose of applying Article 260 of the Penal Code.

Complete Tables 3 and 4 and provide additional text specifying how the different sources are used (e.g. base load, peak load) and specify in the table column if the capacity and electricity production are reported as gross (G) or net (N) values.

The time step of 10 years plus results in a 5-year step in the past 10 years and in the year of latest available data. The total number of data columns should be less than 10.

TABLE 3: INSTALLED CAPACITY, ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION

		1990	2000	2010	2015	2016	Compound Annual Growth Rate (%) 2000 to Last Year
Capacity of electrical plants (GW(e))	G/N
- Thermal		1.283	4.827	8.080	10.160	10.361	7.2
- Nuclear		—	—	—	—	—	—
- Hydro		2.486	4.272	5.230	5.730	6.393	3.1
- Wind		—	—	0.180	0.300	1.102	32.0
- Geothermal		—	—	—	—	—	—
- Other Renewable		0.069	0.105	0.460	0.840	4.189	243.1
- Total		3.838	9.204	13.960	17.020	22.045	8.7
Electricity production (TW.h)	G/N
- Thermal		9.440	19.859	21.668	30.856	47.281	8.6
- Nuclear		—	—	—	—	—	—
- Hydro		8.930	19.000	21.38	19.737	19.208	0.1
- Wind		—	—	0.325	0.547	2.216	36.4
- Geothermal		—	—	—	—	—	—
- Other Renewable		—	0.910	10.000	10.299	5.171	29.3
- Total**		18.370	39.769	53.369	61.439	73.877	5.4
Total electricity consumption (TW.h)		—	36.292	56.946	68.866	n.a.	6.0

¹ Electricity transmission losses are not deducted.

** Other renewable include solar and biomass.

—: data not available.

n.a.: not applicable.

Source: National Energy Commission (www.cne.cl).

TABLE 4: ENERGY RELATED RATIOS

	1990	2000	2010	2015	2016
Energy consumption per capita (GJ/capita)	45.45	68.45	62.95	65	*
Electricity consumption per capita (kW.h/capita)	1 345.7	2 490.2	3 331.3	3 814	3 820
Electricity production/Energy production	19.54%	40.38%	59.14%	39.08%	*
Nuclear/Total electricity	—	—	—	—	—
Ratio of external dependency	47.58%	68.37%	75.93%	67,8%	*

¹ Net import/Total energy consumption.

* Energy National Balance 2016 is not yet published.

—: data not available.

Sources: Energy National Balance (www.cne.cl); Statistic National Institute (www.ine.cl); Load Economic Load Dispatch Centre (www.cdec-sic.cl and www.cdec-sing.cl).

By the end of the 1960s, ENDESA (The National Company of Electricity) through an existent cooperation agreement with France, sent several professionals abroad to study and get trained in nuclear subjects. On their return, these professionals set up a Nuclear National Office whose mission was to establish a nuclear power plant in Chile. They decided on a 100MW reactor, which would be located in the Antofagasta region (in northern Chile) and include a desalinization plant with a capacity of about 20 000 m³/month. They also started to look for an appropriate site, hiring the US company NUS Corporation for this task. The plan was to have the reactor operating by 1975. The only remaining task was to make a trip through Europe in order to visit several reactors and learn about the vendors’ proposals in order to choose a provider and sign a contract.

In October 1970, Salvador Allende was elected president, and with his party coming into power, the plan for implementing a nuclear power program was set aside. ENDESA closed the Nuclear National Office and reassigned the professionals to other areas.

By the end of the 1970s, with a military government coming into power, the nuclear option was relaunched. This time the project considered the implementation of a 600 MW reactor, which would be located in the central region. The site selection study was performed by the US company Dames & Moore. The project did not seem feasible from an economic perspective; the nuclear plant not only had high construction and maintenance costs, but also required a robust electrical system. Additionally, there was a perceived ambiguity between the peaceful and military use of nuclear energy, so there was internal opposition to this option as well. Finally, the nuclear option was dismissed in 1982.

Since then, the debate reemerged strongly with the energy crisis of 2007. In 2007, the Nuclear Energy Working Group was formed to study the feasibility of implementation and use of nuclear energy in Chile. This study concluded that according to international experience and despite the risks of earthquakes faced by Chile and potential waste management problems, nuclear energy is a viable option, but further studies were needed before making any decision.

In 2010, the study “Nuclear Electricity: Possibilities and Challenges” stated that the development of nuclear energy in Chile should aim to close identified gaps: “…technological, institutional and fundamental knowledge such as a complete geological information of the economy, modify the current legal and regulatory institutions, implement a plan to meet the human resources necessities and finalize other complementary studies”. The study also concluded that public approval is not only a fundamental requirement but also the biggest challenge faced before considering nuclear power as an energy alternative. If these problems were solved by the mid-2010s, the study estimated that nuclear power plants might be included as part of Chile’s energy matrix. One of the main conclusions of this study was that nuclear power would be a “strategic insurance that would ensure sustainable energy supply in the long term”. The study predicted that nuclear energy could become part of Chile’s energy matrix as early as 2030. 

In March 2010, a new government came to power, which announced that it would continue studying the nuclear option in close cooperation with the IAEA. However, during this government two important events took place that had a negative impact on national plans for evaluating a nuclear power option: Chile’s 8.8 magnitude earthquake (2010) and Japan’s earthquake and Fukushima accident (2011). In addition to the tragedy that Chile’s earthquake brought to the country, the event increased public awareness regarding Chile’s highly seismic nature and raised fears that the country might not be prepared enough to withstand these kinds of events. Then, the Fukushima accident came a year after, and contributed to definitely putting on hold the nuclear power evaluation process. For the following 4 years no relevant work was performed on this topic.

In January 2015, the Government decided to again review whether the conclusions of previous studies were still valid in the light of new developments, and what the country should do if it decided to resume the evaluation process, so the Nuclear Power Energy Committee was created to prepare the report “Nuclear Power Generation in Chile: Towards a Rational Decision”. This report agrees with the previous report from 2010 that the country must continue working to close the gaps inhibiting the proper implementation of nuclear energy. Furthermore, the report states that the possibility of using nuclear energy should not be discarded without a “rational and comprehensive analysis and considering all relevant aspects of this technology and the feasibility of its use in Chile”. Finally, the report concludes that social approval is crucial to start any project involving nuclear energy development in Chile.

In December 2015, the Government published the document Energy 2050: Chile’s Energy Policy, as a long term energy policy with a clear map of the Chilean energy sector to 2050. Energy 2050 states that nuclear energy is not an option for Chile at the present time, and its uptake depends on further research regarding security and economic rationality as well as community acceptance. Despite the exclusion of nuclear energy from the energy agenda, its possible use in the future has not been ruled out. In fact, the need for additional studies related to technology, location, waste management and public approval has been recognized and the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission has been appointed to lead these studies so that in the next review of the energy policy (2020) this option could be discussed.

Currently, a team has been set up to work on this task and some resources have been allocated for hiring external studies in some specific topics.

The “Strategic Development and Nuclear Power” office was created in CCHEN on March 2016. This office is leading the studies to be developed by 2020 and is working closely with Minister of Energy and National Energy Commission.

1. Main strategic decisions

CCHEN is leading studies to be developed by 2020. The analysis will be performed according to the potential contribution of nuclear power to the main pillars of the energy policy.

1. Project framework (time scales, number of units, etc.)

In the next review of the energy policy, the nuclear power option should be reviewed. This will take place by 2020.

1. Type of contract (turnkey, split package, multiple packages)

To be decided, but the turnkey approach is expected to be considered.

1. Application of nuclear power (electricity supply, heat supply, water desalination)

To be decided, but all the options will be considered.

1. Policy for nuclear fuel cycle

Even though more studies still need to be performed, it is foreseen that the country is more likely to implement the following:

1. Open fuel cycle: Abstaining from both sending fuel to be reprocessed and from developing its own capacity to do so. This takes into account the international community’s concerns regarding proliferation, as well as the fact that reprocessing is not economically viable for small-scale programs.

2. Fuel supply: Chile only has the ability to build fuel elements for research reactors, not for nuclear power reactors. Regarding uranium mining, although uranium deposits have been found and there is a pilot project in place to extract uranium from copper mining waste, this remains a pilot project.

There is no formal Nuclear Energy Programme Implementing Organization (NEPIO) in place yet. Currently, there is a working group composed of CCHEN, the National Energy Commission and the Ministry of Energy. The CCHEN team is in charge of leading the work, working directly with the IAEA and proposing new studies to the Ministry of Energy.

Some funding has been allocated for conducting studies on relevant topics such as communication, safety, environmental issues and costs.

Energy projections for the long term are being performed, using IAEA models, Model for Analysis of Energy Demand (MAED) and Model for Energy Supply System Alternatives and their General Environmental Impacts (MESSAGE).

There is also a plan in place for connecting both electrical systems.

A study was performed in 2008 in order to assess natural hazards such as earthquakes and surface faulting, tsunamis, flooding, geotechnical issues and volcanism. Based on the results of those studies, the need for further information was identified. However, there are no intentions of moving forward on identifying potential sites until the country has made a decision to launch a nuclear power program.

However, CCHEN will advance in reviewing international regulations for authorizing sites and licensing process in order to identify main exclusion criteria that could be applied in Chile. Additionally, some other non-technical aspects will be reviewed.

The objectives of the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission, its scope and competences are duly defined by law, decree law, supreme decree and decree with force of law. This documentation establishes that the institution must fulfill the roles of:

1. Regulatory body and inspector of the country’s nuclear and radiological activity;

2. Supreme government advisor in nuclear and radiological matters;

3. Generator of technology-based products and services focused on the well-being and security of persons and protection of the environment and goods;

4. Generation of knowledge through basic and applied research to support the processes of innovation of companies and economic agents.

To achieve these roles, specifically numbers 2, 3 and 4, the institution has in its organization, among others, the Nuclear Applications and Research Division (DIAN). This division is responsible for: (i) research and development management, (ii) nuclear science and technology outreach, and (iii) intangible assets creation and transference.

Development in the manufacturing of fuel elements for use in the research reactor (RECH-1) represents a major step in the progress of nuclear technology in Chile. In addition to contributing to technological development, it has led to savings in foreign currency by making Chile self-sufficient in this area.

In terms of basic research, major progress has been achieved by the department of Thermo-nuclear Plasmas, Plasma Physics and Nuclear Fusion Laboratory in CCHEN. It began operating towards the end of 1993 and its current line of work is centred on plasma physics in pulsed small devices such as z-pinch, wires array, capillary discharges and plasma focus devices, in which basic science problems in plasma physics that are of relevance to nuclear fusion are studied, such as dynamics and stability, and radiation and particles emission from dense plasmas produced by electrical discharges.

At the same time, the study and development of technologies associated with a field of research referred to as pulsed power are being promoted. These technologies have applications in several fields of science and engineering, such as production of transient electronic discharges, generation of radiation and bundles of ions, high-density matter, production of intense pulsating magnetic fields, and shock waves. Recently, the axial plasma shock and plasma jets produced later in the plasma focus discharge process have been preliminarily characterized. On the one hand, plasma shock produced an equivalent damage factor on materials than that expected in large nuclear fusion experimental devices such as ITER and IFE. Thus, the use of small plasma focus, i.e. being used to study the effects of high power flux on materials relevant to fusion reactors. On the other hand, plasma jets could be useful for astrophysical laboratory studies. In addition, the effects of pulsed radiation in biological cells is being studied.

Complementary to this, research using continuous plasmas has started. Plasma torch for studies in biology, material science and waste treatment has been designed and built.

Several plasma diagnostics and radiation detection are being implemented to perform the research, such as electrical diagnostics, detection of neutrons, ion beams, spectroscopy and digital optical refractive diagnostics.

Theoretical studies in non-thermal equilibrium plasmas have started recently.

In addition, outreach activities to the general public and students are a permanent effort of the Thermonuclear Plasma Department of CCHEN. Videos that are widely seen on YouTube have been created:

https://www.youtube.com/user/cienciaentretenida https://www.youtube.com/user/EntertainingScience

The Plasma Physics Department maintains international collaborations with groups in Argentina, the Czech Republic, India, Spain and the United States of America.

Chile seeks to participate actively in international energy organizations, recognizing the importance of international bodies for understanding and regulating Chile’s increasingly interdependent economic and social processes. In this line, closer ties have been forged with major players, such as the International Energy Agency (IEA), the IAEA, the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum and the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).

Chile also participates actively in regional entities that analyse, coordinate and design energy policies, including the Latin American Energy Organization (OLADE), the Energy Experts Group of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), the Commission for Regional Energy Integration (CIER), the Ibero-American Association of Energy Regulators (ARIAE), and the Mercosur Energy Subgroup. Chile is also a member of APEC’s Energy Working Group.

In the nuclear field, CCHEN’s interaction with external entities, national as well as international, is carried out by the institution’s Technical Cooperation and International Relations Office, which coordinates cooperation within the topic of nuclear energy in the country with direct support from the IAEA. The Technical Cooperation Unit coordinates participation of CCHEN officials and of other national entities in training activities abroad. It also coordinates training in Chile of international trainees, sponsored by the IAEA.

CCHEN also contributes its professionals for participation in congresses and international scientific meetings, where they disseminate information on its current work in the areas of research and development and in the area of peaceful applications of nuclear energy.

Between 2012 and 2016, thanks in part to the IAEA’s Technical Co-operation Programme (TCP), Chilean professionals participated in 36 interregional projects, 10 regional projects, 18 of which were sponsored by the ARCAL agreement (Regional Cooperation Agreements for Latin America and the Caribbean), and in 6 national projects.

BODY	BENEFICIARY ORGANIZATIONS	IAEA * CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHILE
The Office of Technical Cooperation and International Relations functions as a link between CCHEN and the IAEA.	National institutions that benefit from the IAEA’s technical cooperation program: CCHEN, Institute for Nutrition and Food Technology, Public Health Institute, Water Management Office, Agriculture and Livestock Service, National Agricultural Engineering Institute, Metropolitan Sanitary Works Company, Environmental Health Service, National Environmental Commission Universities: Universidad de Chile, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Universidad Austral de Chile, Universidad de Concepción, Universidad de la Frontera, Universidad de Antofagasta, Universidad de La Serena Hospitals: José Joaquín Aguirre, San Juan de Dios, Salvador, Clínico Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Instituto del Cáncer, Posta Central, Hospital Regional de Valdivia Clinics: Alemana, Instituto de Radiaciones Médicas and others	Since 1976 up to 2011: 117 national projects completed 110 regional and interregional projects completed Between 2012 and 2016: 6 active national projects 10 active regional and 36 active interregional projects

* CCHEN–OCTRI Profiles (May 2016).

Article 2 of the Nuclear Safety Law (Law No. 18,302) establishes that the regulation, supervision, control and inspection of activities related to the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, facilities and nuclear substances correspond to CCHEN and the Ministry of Energy, where appropriate. Article 4 of the same law indicates that for site exploration, construction, commissioning, operation and decommissioning of the facilities, plants, centres, laboratories, establishments and nuclear equipment, the authorization of the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission will be needed. On the other hand, nuclear power stations, enrichment plants, reprocessing plants and the permanent storage of radioactive waste will be authorized by supreme decree issued by the Ministry of Energy.

The authorities on radiation protection are the following:

• CCHEN in its own facilities and those relevant installations defined in Supreme Decree No. 133/84;

• The Health Ministry through its regional offices for lower risk facilities as defined in the same decree.

As part of the studies related to the decision to launch a NPP in Chile, the independence of the regulator is being considered a key issue. Two draft laws have been delivered to the authority, one related to improving the current nuclear safety framework and the other proposing the separation of the promotion roles from the regulatory one that either CCHEN and/or MoH hold at present. This new situation might be reflected in a unique Regulatory Council of Nuclear and Radiological Safety and Physical Protection.

Nuclear Power

Chilean regulations do not establish a procedure to grant licenses, other than the fact mentioned in the Nuclear Safety Law that nuclear facilities require a site, construction, commissioning, operations and a decommissioning license.

Nuclear Research Facilities

The Nuclear Safety Law establishes that nuclear facilities require a site, construction, commissioning, operations and a decommissioning license. CCHEN internal standards are applied. These standards are currently under revision.

The legislative framework applicable to nuclear facilities in Chile is defined by the following laws:

1. LAW No. 18,302 — NUCLEAR SAFETY LAW, published in the Official Gazette No. 31,860 of 2 May 1984. This law consists of six titles, that is:

1. TITLE I — REGULATORY AUTHORITY, in which the different regulatory bodies and their jurisdiction fields are defined.

2. TITLE II — DEFINITIONS

3. TITLE III — NUCLEAR SAFETY, in which the general approach related to nuclear safety is established, including authorizations and their requirements to operate a nuclear facility.

4. TITLE IV — INFRACTIONS TO THE LEGAL AND REGULATION REQUIREMENTS ON PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY, which establishes the sanctions that can be applied in case of non-compliance.

5. TITLE V — CIVIL RESPONSIBILITY FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE, which establishes the amount and the modes of insurance to cover nuclear damage.

6. TITLE VI — RADIOACTIVE FACILITIES, which establishes the competent authority for the control of the radioactive facilities and responsibility for the preparation of the associated rules applicable to these facilities.

2. LAW No. 18,730 — MODIFIES THE NUCLEAR SAFETY LAW, published in the Official Gazette No. 33,143 of 10 August 1988. This law only modifies Title VI of the previous law, with regard to the competent authority for the control of the radioactive facilities. CCHEN is incorporated as competent authority for the control of the facilities, as established in Decree Law No. 133, indicated later on.

3. LAW No. 19,825 — MODIFIES THE NUCLEAR SAFETY LAW, published in the Official Gazette of 1 October 2002. This law mainly modifies Title III of the previous law, with regard to the competence of CCHEN as competent authority for the control of transportation of radioactive material in or through the exclusive economic zone, “presential sea” or national air space.

4. LAW No. 20,402 — MODIFIES THE NUCLEAR SAFETY LAW, published in the Official Gazette of 1 February 2010. This law mainly modifies the dependence of CCHEN from the Ministry of Mining to dependence on the Ministry of Energy.

5. LAW No. 19,300 — LAW ON ENVIRONMENT, GENERAL BASES, published in the Official Gazette of 9 April 1994. This law consists of six titles, that is:

• TITLE I — GENERAL ASPECTS.

• TITLE II — ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TOOLS.

• TITLE III — RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE.

• TITLE IV — INSPECTION.

• TITLE V — ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FUND.

• TITLE VI — NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION.

6. LAW No. 20,417 — MODIFIES LAW ON ENVIRONMENT, GENERAL BASES, published in the Official Gazette of 26 January 2010. This law primarily creates the Ministry of Environment, which replaces the National Environmental Commission.

The legislative framework applicable to nuclear facilities in Chile is defined by the following regulations:

1. SUPREME DECREE No. 87/84 — REGULATION ON PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL AND FACILITIES, published in the Official Gazette No. 32,117 of 9 March 1984. It is based on IAEA document INFCIRC/225.

2. SUPREME DECREE No. 133/84 — REGULATIONS ON AUTHORIZATIONS FOR RADIOACTIVE FACILITIES OR IONIZING RADIATION GENERATING EQUIPMENT, PERSONNEL OPERATING SUCH EQUIPMENT AND OTHER RELATED ACTIVITIES, published in the Official Gazette No. 31,955 of 23 August 1984. This ordinance categorizes the different radioactive facilities according to the associated risk of practice, the required authorizations and the associated requirements of both facilities and workers; it includes the import, export and transportation of radioactive material, as well as the way to apply sanctions.

3. SUPREME DECREE No. 3/85 — REGULATION ON RADIATION PROTECTION OF RADIOACTIVE FACILITIES, published in the Official Gazette No. 32,153 of 3 January 1985. This establishes the limits of acceptable dosage (based on the ICRP No. 26) and requirements for the Services of Personal Dosimetry, laid down in the country.

4. SUPREME DECREE No. 12/85 — REGULATION FOR THE SAFE TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, published in the Official Gazette No. 32,192 of 10 June 1985. It is a transcription of the 1985 version of the IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-6 of the IAEA — Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material.

5. SUPREME DECREE No. 95/01 — REGULATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM. Published in the Official Gazette of 7 December 2002.

The technical requirements for nuclear research reactors are established in standards approved by CCHEN. The regulatory position in the case of technical matters not defined in national regulations, including the case of nuclear facilities, is to adopt the IAEA recommendations or the regulations of the supplier’s country, if no specific guidance appears in the IAEA documents.

CCHEN Safety Standards

1. NCS-DR-01 “Radioactive Waste Management”

2. NCS-GG-02 “Procedure for Licensing Nuclear and Radioactive Facilities”

3. NCS-GG-04 “Specific Safety Procedures”

4. NCS-PM-01 “Calibration of Radiation Detection Devices”

5. NCS-PP-01 “Radioactive Facilities Operator Licensing”

6. NCS-PP-02 “Nuclear Research Reactor Operator Licensing”

7. NCS-PR-01 “Radiation Protection Standards”

8. NCS-SI-01 “Occupational Health”

9. NCS-SV-01 “System of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material”

10. NCS-TR-01 “Nuclear and Radioactive Material Transportation Licensing”

CCHEN Regulatory Guides

1. GR-C-01 “Design Criteria for Structures of Nuclear Research Facilities”

2. GR-E-01 “Design Criteria for Electrical Systems of Nuclear Research Facilities”

3. GR-G-02 “Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Criteria”

4. GR-G-03 “Nuclear Research Reactor Safety Reports”

5. GR-G-08 “Nuclear Research Facilities Emergency Planning”

6. GR-G-09 “Nuclear Research Facilities Commissioning”

7. GR-G-10 “Quality Assurance for Commissioning and Operation of Nuclear Research Facilities”

8. GR-G-11 “Nuclear Research Reactor Operation”

9. GR-G-13 “Periodic Inspection of Nuclear Research Facilities”

10. GR-G-14 “Organization and Procedures of Nuclear Research Reactors”

11. GR-G-15 “Radiation Protection for Nuclear and Radioactive Facilities”

12. GR-M-01 “Design Criteria for Hydraulic Systems of Nuclear Research Reactors”

13. GR-N-01 “Design Criteria of Pool-type Nuclear Research Reactor Core”

14. GR-P-01 “Radiation Protection Design Considerations of Nuclear Research Facilities”

REFERENCES

Chile’s Energy Agenda:

http://www.energia.gob.cl/sites/default/files/energy_agenda_summary.pdf

Chile’s Energy Policy:

http://www.energia2050.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Energy-2050-Chile-s-Energy-Policy.pdf