Uranium Deposit Report
Deposit : |
Ebba Sud |
Country : |
Niger |
General Information |
|||
Geological District |
Arlit | ||
Geological Region |
Arlit | ||
Political/Geographical Province |
Agadez | ||
Last Data Update |
2009-01-01 | ||
Owner(s) |
33 %, COGEMA | ||
|
33 %, OURD |
|
|
|
33 %, ONAREM |
|
|
Operator |
COGEMA | ||
Synonym Name(s) |
Afasto Sud |
Technical Information |
|||
Tonnage Range (t U)
|
5,000 - 10,000 | ||
Grade Range (% U)
|
0.20 - 0.50 | ||
Deposit Status
|
Development | ||
Current Processing Plant
|
|||
Cumulative Production (t U)
|
0 | ||
Production Period
|
|||
Produced Grade (% U)
|
0 | ||
General Remarks |
Geological Information |
|||
Deposit Type |
Sandstone - Tabular | ||
Geological Setting |
Uranium deposits from the Arlit-Akouta district are located along the eastern margin of the Tim Mersoi intra-cratonic Basin, near the volcanic Air massif. The sedimentary cover, unconformable on Precambrian granites, comprises : - at the base, three carboniferous units, Terada (Lower Visean) and Lower and Upper Tagora (Upper Visean). All the COMINAK deposits are situated in the Guezouman Formation of the Lower Tagora and all the SOMAIR deposits are located in the Tarat Formation of the Upper Tagora, - the Izegouandane unit (Permian) divided into four formations. The Moradi deposit is located in the Moradi upper formation, - the Aguelal and Goufat units (Trias), - the Wagadi unit (Jurassic), with the Imouraren deposit, - the Dabla unit on top (Lower Cretaceous). The total thickness of the sedimentary formations is around 1500 m. The Guezouman Formation (0-180 m) starts with a polymict conglomerate (2 m) and consists of medium to fine-grained isogranular quartz sandstone beds. Argillaceous breaks are very rare. The Guezouman sedimentation was mainly controled by basement structures consisting of N 80° E and N 130° E faults and N 40° E folds. | ||
Age of Mineralization |
Pb-Pb age = 338 +/- 5 My (Devillers & Menez, 1977) U-Pb age = 193 Ma (Forbes, 1988) U-Pb age (207/206) = 144 +/- 15 My (Turpin et al., 1991) | ||
Mineralization |
Ore Mineralogy: pitchblende, coffinite, V-rich chlorite, montroseite, jordisite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, blende Ore Controls: Pyrite and organic matter rich layers in basal sandstones channels | ||
MetallogenicAspects |
A small amount of uranium may have been derived from the erosion and leaching of the Air crystalline basement, but the major part probably resulted from the volcanic activity. Major preconcentrations were certainly penecontemporaneous with the sedimentation with uranium precipitation within the fluvio-deltaic environment in the favorable areas with a high organic matter content. Uranium remobilisation by oxidizing waters penetrating the sandstones both from the east and from the west (the Arlit fault) contributed to give the deposit its present shape, partly of stratiform type and partly of roll front type. No particular concentration of uranium minerals along faults has been identified. | ||
Age of Mineralization |
Pb-Pb age = 338 +/- 5 My (Devillers & Menez, 1977) U-Pb age = 193 Ma (Forbes, 1988) U-Pb age (207/206) = 144 +/- 15 My (Turpin et al., 1991) | ||
DepositShape |
While the channel determines the general shape of the uranium deposit (tabular, elongate lenses), the sedimentary structures and the lithology affect its detailed distribution. | ||
DepositDimensions |
Deposit Depth Top: 200 m Deposit Depth Bottom: 300 m | ||
GeologicalRemarks |
Eastern Tim Mersoï Basin, foothills of the Aïr basement. Cambro Silurian to Miocene sediments : Terada group Tagora group “Continental intercalaire” | ||
Metallogenic Aspects |
A small amount of uranium may have been derived from the erosion and leaching of the Air crystalline basement, but the major part probably resulted from the volcanic activity. Major preconcentrations were certainly penecontemporaneous with the sedimentation with uranium precipitation within the fluvio-deltaic environment in the favorable areas with a high organic matter content. Uranium remobilisation by oxidizing waters penetrating the sandstones both from the east and from the west (the Arlit fault) contributed to give the deposit its present shape, partly of stratiform type and partly of roll front type. No particular concentration of uranium minerals along faults has been identified. |