 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Return To: Session ITERP1 - ITER EDA 1 (Thursday, 22
Prev Page: (ITERP1/16) Progress in RF Heating (IC, EC and
Next Page: (ITERP1/18) Nuclear Analysis for ITER
|
|
|
P. L. Mondino , P. Bayetti 1, E. Di Pietro ,
R. Hemsworth 1, H. Iida 2, T. Inoue ,
K. Ioki 2, G. Johnson 2, A. Krylov 3,
V. Kulygin 3, P. Massmann 1, K. Miyamoto 4,
Y. Okumura 4, A. Panasenkov 3,
R. T. Santoro 2, M. Sironi 5, Y. Utin 2,
K. Watanabe 4, M. Yamada 2
ITER Joint Central Team, Naka Joint Work Site, Naka-machi,
Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
1 EU Home Team, CEA/Cadarache, St-Paul-lez-Durance, France
2 ITER JCT, Garching JWS, Garching, Germany
3 RF Home Team, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
4 JA Home Team, JAERI Naka, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
5 ITER JCT, San Diego JWS, San Diego, CA, USA
Abstract
The Neutral Beam (NB) system for the International Thermonuclear
Experimental Reactor (ITER ) has reached a high degree of integration with the
tokamak and with the rest of the plant. Operational requirements and
maintainability have been considered in the design. The paper considers the
integration with the tokamak, discusses design improvements which appear
necessary and finally notes R&D progress in key areas.
IAEA 1999