Syrian Arab Republic
(Updated 2018)
PREAMBLE
This report provides information on the status and development of nuclear power programmes in the Syrian Arab Republic, including factors related to the effective planning, decision making and implementation of the nuclear power programme that together lead to safe and economical operations of nuclear power plants.
The CNPP summarizes organizational and industrial aspects of nuclear power programmes and provides information about the relevant legislative, regulatory and international framework in the Syrian Arab Republic.
The Syrian Arab Republic has no nuclear power reactor in operation. However, according to an official energy planning study conducted in 2010, a nuclear power programme encompassing two nuclear reactors would be viable to contribute to national electricity production after 2020. A number of important changes and transformations across various social, demographic, economic and technical spectrums of the country took place due to a devastating war over the past seven years. Thus, the output of previous studies will no longer be valid, owing to the coherent linkage between the energy and electricity sectors and drivers of national economic and social development.
1. COUNTRY ENERGY OVERVIEW
1.1. ENERGY INFORMATION
1.1.1. Energy policy
The overall target of the Syrian Arab Republic’s energy policy aims at ensuring supply security by providing energy services to all segments of society at effective and affordable prices appropriate to Syrian economic conditions. In accomplishing this goal, Syrian energy policy is faced with three main challenges: (1) expanding the gas market; (2) sustaining oil production; and (3) developing the country’s power capacity. To overcome these challenges, the following general implementation measures are considered:
Reconstructing damaged infrastructure;
Reducing technical losses and illegal consumption;
Improving energy efficiency;
Encouraging the use of renewables and nuclear options;
Establishing a cost oriented price policy;
Conserving oil and substituting it with gas;
Attracting foreign investments in the oil, gas and power sectors;
Exploiting the geographical situation as a conjunction point between gas demanding regions (mainly in Europe) and countries with huge resources (the Islamic Republic of Iran and Gulf countries);
Exploring and exploiting the coastal gas resources in the Mediterranean Sea.
A key challenge for the Syrian natural gas industry is logistical, with gas reserves located mainly in northeastern Syria, while the general population is centred in western and southern Syria. The Syrian Petroleum Company is currently working to increase Syria’s gas production through several projects aimed at expanding and developing the national natural gas network. In addition, the electricity generation policy has the priority to substitute natural gas for oil in the existing stations and convert natural gas power plants to combined cycle wherever possible. Moreover, the Government is in the process of relaxing state monopolies over the power sector. There are many efforts to reinforce transmission and distribution networks, and to improve the quality of customer services.
Covering future energy needs in respect to the sustainable development of energy sector forms is the main objective of the energy policy. Responding to the high increase in energy consumption and increasing economic, financial and environmental burdens, and taking into account the unique and special requirements of the reconstruction process, the Syrian Arab Republic has made noticeable efforts over the past two decades to explore possible energy conservation and efficiency improvement measures, in order to reduce energy demand on the one hand and substitute the exhaustible fossil fuels with renewable and nuclear alternatives on the other. The importance of energy conservation and energy efficiency policy in the context of sustainable development has regained political momentum. Recent developments on the energy market have seen highly volatile oil prices, increased awareness of the need for energy security and growing energy related environmental problems, including the threat of climate change. In this context, energy conservation and efficiency improvements can benefit both society and the environment by reducing atmospheric pollution; lessening negative externalities resulting from energy production; boosting industrial competitiveness; generating employment and business opportunities; improving the housing stock and the comfort level of occupants; enhancing productivity; increasing the security of supply; and contributing to poverty alleviation, among other aspects.
In this context, the period from 2000 to 2010 witnessed remarkable national activities in the field of energy system analysis. A series of studies related to the future picture of this sector through various scenarios for energy and electricity demand development were carried out, and a well qualified and specialized national team was built, supported by different international organizations. IAEA tools and advanced methods such as Model for Analysis of Energy Demand (MAED), Wien Automatic System Planning (WASP), Model for Energy Supply Strategy Alternatives and their General Environmental Impact (MESSAGE) and Simplified Approach for Estimating Impacts of Electricity Generation (SIMPACTS) were used.
A Law on Energy Conservation was enacted by the Ministry of Electricity in 2009 to fulfil the country’s sustainable development requirements, with an emphasis on disseminating energy conservation concepts and energy efficiency actions, improving energy saving and deploying various renewable energy applications.
Through this law, the relevant institutions shall be committed to energy conservation and efficiency practices, use renewable energies in all sectors of their activities and use highly energy efficient equipment.
To assess the influence of climate change and the impact of the Kyoto protocol on the future development of the Syrian energy sector, the Ministry of the Environment, with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), finalized a project entitled Enabling Activities for the Preparation of Syria’s Initial National Communication to the UNFCCC. Furthermore, the Syrian Arab Republic joined the Paris Agreement about greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation on 18 November 2017, and Syrian nationally determined contributions (NDCs) are being prepared.
1.1.2. Estimated available energy
Syrian fossil resources are limited to oil and natural gas. The proven geological oil reserves are estimated to be almost 24 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BBOE), of which 6.9 BBOE are extractable. By 2003, almost 4.3 BBOE had already been extracted and the remaining oil reserves are estimated to about 2.6 BBOE. The proven geological reserve of natural gas in Syria is estimated at 612 billion cubic meter (Bm3), of which 371 Bm3 are extractable. Sixty Bm3 had been produced through 2003 and the remaining reserve is about 311 Bm3. Key indicators for the Syrian energy sources are presented in Table 1.
The estimated geological reserve of natural gas of all kinds in Syria is about 705 Bm3, while the production of disposable reserves is about 405 Bm3. According to the Oil and Gas Journal, as of 1 January 2010, Syria’s proven natural gas reserves were estimated at 240 Bm3, about half of which is associated gas.
TABLE 1. ESTIMATED AVAILABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Fossil Fuels | Nuclear | Renewables | ||||
Solid | Liquid | Gas | Uranium | Hydro | Other renewable | |
Total amount in specific units* units | n.a. | 364 | 311 | n.a. | 3 | |
Total amount in exajoules (EJ) (EJ) | n.a. | 15.24 | 11.71 | n.a. | 0.01 |
* Solid, liquid: million tonnes; gas: billion m3; uranium: metric tonnes; hydro, renewable: TW.
n.a.: data not applicable.
Source: MOPMR, 2009, Reserves and expected annual productions of oil and natural gas, official letter to prime minister, Damascus (in Arabic).
1.1.3. Energy statistics
The main statistical indicators of the Syrian energy system related to energy production, consumption and the ratios of electricity production/energy production and external dependency are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2. ENERGY STATISTICS
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
2010 |
2015 |
2016 |
Compound annual growth rate (%) 2000–2016 |
|
Energy consumption [EJ] | |||||||
- Total | 0.6900 | 0.7900 | 0.9785 | 0.4334 | 0.4134 | –4.0 | |
- Solids*** | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0252 | 0.0629 | 0.0629 | 12.2 | |
- Liquids | 0.2600 | 0.4500 | 0.6239 | 0.1888 | 0.2106 | –4.6 | |
- Gases | 0.4000 | 0.3100 | 0.3010 | 0.1784 | 0.1302 | –5.3 | |
- Nuclear | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||
- Hydro | 0.0200 | 0.0200 | 0.0284 | 0.0033 | 0.0097 | –4.4 | |
- Other renewables | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||
Energy production [EJ] | |||||||
- Total | 0.9400 | 1.5300 | 1.2614 | 0.2834 | 0.235 | –11.0 | |
- Solids*** | 0.0100 | 0.0100 | 0.0252 | 0.0629 | 0.0629 | 12.2 | |
- Liquids | 0.8700 | 1.2000 | 0.8284 | 0.0195 | 0.0144 | –24.2 | |
- Gases | 0.0400 | 0.3000 | 0.3794 | 0.1976 | 0.1481 | –4.3 | |
- Nuclear | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||
- Hydro | 0.0200 | 0.0200 | 0.0284 | 0.0033 | 0.0097 | –4.4 | |
- Other renewables | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | ||
Net import (Import–Export) [EJ] | –0.6000 | –0.7000 | –0.1866 | 0.0283 | 0.1929 | ||
- Total | 0.340 | 0.830 | 1.075 | 0.312 | 0.428 | –4.1 |
Source: Ministry of Electricity reports and EB for the years mentioned.
1.2. THE ELECTRICITY SYSTEM
The energy sector is a robust component of domestic economic activities. The main contributors to the Syrian energy sector are the Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, the Ministry of Electricity and the Atomic Energy Commission of Syria.
The Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources produces limited amounts of electricity from gas released during the oil production process, which is used in the operation of the oil production facilities and by the companies affiliated with the Ministry.
The Ministry of Electricity is responsible for investment, tariffs, planning and policy formulation in the power sector. The power system is managed by the Public Establishment for Electricity (PEE), which is divided into PEEGT (Generation and Transmission), and PEDEEE (Distribution and Exploitation of Electrical Energy). PEEGT is responsible for transmission, including the 400 kV and 230 kV levels, while PEDEEE supervises the 66 kV, 20 kV, and 0.4 kV levels. As a result, PEEGT has 230 kV customers, that is, large industries and irrigation. All other customers are under the responsibility of PEDEEE. PEDEEE is responsible for 14 regional distribution authorities. PEEGT controls the generation and transmission of electricity, producing 88% of the total electricity, while PEDEEE is responsible for sales and distribution. The organizational structure of the Ministry of Electricity is presented in Fig. 1.
The Ministry of Irrigation is responsible for water resource management and hydro power plants. The General Establishment of the Euphrates Dam is responsible for the three main hydropower plants of Al-Thawra, Baath and Tishreen, all located on the Euphrates River. These plants produce 5% of the total electricity, while the share of the Ministry of Petroleum is 3% of total production of electricity using gas turbines.
1.2.1. Electricity policy and decision making process
The Syrian generation sector relies mainly upon fossil fuels, which have had a share above 80% of the electricity mix over the past two decades. For the future development of the electricity generation system, Syrian electricity policy focuses on the following issues:
Reconstructing the damaged infrastructure;
Improving technical performance of the existing power plants;
Enhancing the electrical load factor of the power system;
Substituting heavy fuel oil (HFO) by natural gas;
Enhancing the average system efficiency by increasing the share of combined cycle (CC);
Increasing the share of clean technologies by encouraging renewables and nuclear options;
Reducing technical losses and illegal consumption of distribution networks.
To analyse and evaluate the future development of the electricity generation sector, two future scenarios were developed by the Energy Planning Group reflecting the most favourable development trends of the Syrian power sector. Both scenarios depend on the least costly expansion approach of generated electricity units over the study period 2005–2030. The first development trend refers to the reference scenario that reflects the baseline development in formulating the future optimal expansion plan of the generation sector under a set of limits and constraints that reflect the technological features of available, committed and future power plant candidates, the availability of domestic fuel resources and the import and export possibilities. The second is an alternative expansion scenario, the so-called clean technology scenario (CTS), which focuses on introducing policy measures in terms of energy saving and clean technologies (renewable, nuclear, natural gas firing) that help in reducing GHG emissions.
Following the reference scenario results, electricity generation will increase from 34 TWh in 2005 to about 148.4 TWh by 2030. The optimal expansion plan shows an increase of installed capacity from 6200 MW to 29 600 MW. The new capacity addition is distributed to 14 360 MW for CC, 12200 MW for heavy fuel fired steam power plants, 900 MW gas turbine, 300 MW wind turbines and 1600 MW for two nuclear power plants that will enter the system in 2020 and 2025.
The optimal expansion plan of CTS shows that the installed capacity will be 32 360 MW by 2030. The new capacity addition comprises 2000 MW for wind, 2000 MW for photovoltaic and 1000 for concentrated solar power; remaining are thermal power plants and two nuclear power plants as in the reference scenario.
1.2.2. Structure of electric power sector
The Ministry of Electricity is responsible for investment, tariffs, planning, and policy formulation in the power sector. The structure of the Syrian electric system related to the Ministry of Electricity is shown in Fig. 1.
FIG. 1. The organizational structure of the Ministry of Electricity.
1.2.3. Main indicators
During the period 1994–2011, peak load demands grew from 2474 MW to 9034 MW, showing an average growth rate of 7.9%. To cope with the increase in both peak load and electricity demand, the available installed capacity increased from 3600 MW to 8500 MW. Thus, the reserve margin of more than 30% in 2000 gradually decreased and the system showed a deficit in the installed capacity in 2006 and 2007 that resulted in real power shortages during peak time. In 2011, the total generated electricity reached about 49 TWh, which was distributed to 95% for thermal and 5% for hydro generation. Due to the limited generation of hydro power, the increasing electricity demand led to steady increases in the use of fossil fuel for generation purposes, mainly by HFO and natural gas. During the period 1994–2011 the share of hydro power generation fluctuated heavily between 20% and 5%, following water availability in the Euphrates River. Thus, over the whole period the share of thermal generation exceeded 80% and reached more than 95% in 2011. Hence, the fossil fuel consumption in the electricity generation, consisting of HFO, natural gas and small amounts of diesel, increased from 3 to 10.2 million tonnes of oil equivalent (Mtoe) between 1994 and 2011.
Between 2011 and 2016, the electricity sector was heavily affected owing to the crisis. Many power plants were out of service, with bad consequences for both electricity demand and supply (available capacity of the system and the electricity generation as well).
According to the technical statistical report for 2016 prepared by PEEGT, of the total installed capacity of 9685 MW in 2016 only 5227 MW was available. However, taking into account the fuel availability, this number may decrease to less than 30%. Moreover, it is expected that the available electricity capacity relative to the fuel availability had shrunk by 2015 to less than 30% of its level in 2010. Thus, by 2016 the total electricity generation dropped from to19.05 TWh compared with 49TWh in 2011.
During this 7 year period, the generated hydropower electricity was heavily affected, and the generated electricity dropped from 2998 GWh in 2011 to 929 in 2016 (EB, 2011, 2016).
TABLE 3. INSTALLED CAPACITY, ELECTRICITYPRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
|||||||
Capacity of electrical plants (GW(e)) | N | ||||||||
- Thermal | 1.830 | 4.500 | 6.950 | ||||||
- Nuclear | 0.000 | ||||||||
- Hydro | 0.550 | 1.060 | 1.250 | ||||||
- Wind | 0.000 | ||||||||
- Geothermal | 0.000 | ||||||||
- Other renewable | 0.000 | ||||||||
- Total | 2.330 | 5.570 | 8.200 | ||||||
Electricity production (TWh) | N | ||||||||
- Thermal | 10.630 | 22.710 | 43.809 | ||||||
- Nuclear | |||||||||
- Hydro | 1.590 | 2.500 | 2.604 | ||||||
- Wind | |||||||||
- Geothermal | |||||||||
- Other renewable | |||||||||
- Total** | 12.220 | 25.210 | 46.413 | ||||||
Total electricity consumption (TWh) | 8.900 | 18.530 | 38.159 |
Source: MOE reports (1990–2000–2010–2015–2016).
TABLE 4. ENERGY RELATED RATIOS
1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2016 | |
Energy consumption per capita (GJ/capita) | 27.90 | 48.80 | 47.46 | 18.63 | 17.34 | |
Electricity consumption per capita (kW.h/capita) | 719.90 | 1135.70 | 2250.98 | 855.51 | 799.11 | |
Electricity production/Energy production (%) | 4.40 | 5.90 | 15.55 | 16.53 | 29.16 | |
Nuclear/Total electricity (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Ratio of external dependency (%) | –186.30 | –92.80 | 25.24 | 0.07 | 46.88 |
Sources: MOE reports (1990–2000–2010–2015–2016), Statistical abstract 2017 from National Central Bureau. MOE published energy balances (1990–2000–2010–2015–2016).
2. NUCLEAR POWER SITUATION
2.1. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
2.1.1. Overview
Law No. 12 of 1976 promulgated the establishment of the Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS). In 1979, AECS assumed its duties as a governmental agency responsible for peaceful utilization of atomic and nuclear technologies. Research departments, facilities and laboratories were founded and staffed with a skilled workforce to carry out basic and applied research in the fields of atomic and nuclear applications. The AECS represents the Syrian Arab Republic in regional and international gatherings related to nuclear and atomic issues. In 1963, the Syrian Arab Republic became a Member State of the International Atomic Energy Agency. It fulfilled its international obligations with respect to nuclear safeguards by signing the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in 1967. The AECS complies with radiation safety regulations and is the regulatory authority in the Syrian Arab Republic. Considering the nuclear power programme, the AECS became the most appropriate organization in the Syrian Arab Republic to assess design options, establish user requirements and prepare bid documents. Regarding the country’s preparation to introduce a first nuclear power plant (NPP), the following main achievements can be noted:
In the years 1980–1985, AECS, in cooperation with the Ministry of Electricity, initiated the first steps toward a nuclear power programme. At that time, a site selection study was conducted in cooperation with the Soviet Union. The first NPP was supposed to be a Soviet design (WWER). However, the project was suspended after the Chernobyl accident.
During the period 1999–2009, a comprehensive long term analysis of the Syrian energy system was performed, aimed at projecting the future final energy and electricity demand and formulating an optimal energy supply strategy up to 2030. The main focus was on the development of an optimal expansion plan for an electricity generation system to identify the optimal future generation mix and evaluate the possible role of the nuclear option and the time schedule for the introduction of the first NPP on the basis of least-cost expansion. For this purpose, various IAEA analysis tools (e.g. MAED, WASP, MESSAGE and SIMPACTS) were employed and two technical cooperation projects with the IAEA were completed. The optimization results indicate that the first NPP, with a capacity of about 1000 MW, would enter the generation system in 2020.
During the same period, significant effort was put into human resources development (HRD) and capacity building related to the nuclear power project, in addition to the preparation of preliminary user requirements for NPPs and a feasibility study for a pressurized water reactor (PWR).
In compliance with IAEA rules and agreements, the AECS has established the Radiological and Nuclear Regulatory Office (RNRO).
In 2009, the higher steering committee for the NPP was established. It sends its reports to the Prime Minister and has responsibilities similar to those of the Nuclear Energy Programme Implementing Organization (NEPIO).
Also in 2009, two committees were established, one at the AECS to deal with regulatory, nuclear safety, environmentaland hydrological aspects, and another at the Ministry of Electricity to deal with issues of technical infrastructures related to electric power plants and the national grid.
2.1.2. Current organizational structure
Figure 2 represents the organizational structure of the Syrian energy sector. The AECS is responsible for all activities related to the peaceful applications of atomic energy in the fields of agriculture, medicine and industry. The AECS also represents the Syrian Arab Republic’s membership in the IAEA and in other organizations. Ministerial Decision No. 6514 of 1997 specifies the functions of the AECS as the regulatory body for radiation safety in the Syrian Arab Republic. Legislative Decree No. 64 of 2005 was issued by the President of the Syrian Arab Republic. This legislative decree complies with the international standards as specified in IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, and GSR Part 1 (Rev. 1), Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety. It nominates the AECS as the regulatory authority with respect to radiation protection and the safety and security of radiation sources.
The Ministry of Electricity is exclusively responsible for the utilization of electric power plants. Thus, the operation of a possible future NPP will be also under this responsibility.
FIG. 2. Diagram illustrating the organizational structure of the Syrian energy system.
2.2. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: OVERVIEW
2.2.1. Status and performance of nuclear power plants
There is no nuclear power plant in operation, under construction or decommissioned in the Syrian Arab Republic. According to the long term energy planning studies in the Syrian Arab Republic, the nuclear option was anticipated to contribute to the national electricity production by 2020. During the period 2020–2030, two nuclear reactors, with a total capacity of 1600 MW, would have operated.
2.2.2. Plant upgrading, plant life management and licence renewals
Not applicable.
2.2.3. Permanent shutdown and decommissioning process
Not applicable.
2.3. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER SECTOR
2.3.1. Nuclear power development strategy
The Syrian energy supply strategy recently highlighted the competitive role of the nuclear option in future energy supply mix. There is a willingness to consider the nuclear option for electricity generation. This acceptance is due to the recently developed supply strategy, which indicated that the Syrian Arab Republic was going to encounter serious problems in covering its future energy demand after 2015. For the time being, the Syrian Arab Republic has maintained a reasonable energy balance. However, as primary energy demand in the Syrian Arab Republic increases by an average rate of 5%, oil production is steadily decreasing, and natural gas production is limited, the country will depend more and more on energy imports. This import was expected to reach 16% of primary energy demand in 2015 and more than 45% in 2020. Thus, in view of the positive supply security features of the nuclear option, introducing it into the Syrian electricity generation system during the period 2020–2025 will increase supply security and mitigate possible socioeconomic concerns.
After a conference held in 2010 on energy options in the Syrian Arab Republic, the Government took a decision to consider nuclear power as one electricity generation option.
The only indication is the recently undertaken effort to support infrastructure development for the future nuclear power programme in the Syrian Arab Republic in the form of a technical cooperation project with the IAEA Conducting a Technical and Economic Feasibility Study and Site Selection for a Nuclear Power Plant (SYR/0/020), which aimed at:
Defining technical specifications and performing an economic evaluation of the most suitable NPP, technically and economically;
Selecting an adequate NPP depending on technical, safety, economic, financial and performance characteristics;
Identifying site parameters that affect the plant design;
Establishing a national coordination framework for the national nuclear power programme;
Establishing a legal framework and a national technical qualification system;
Evaluating the development status in the Syrian Arab Republic regarding nuclear infrastructure and user requirements for introducing the first NPP.
The first NPP was planned to be a turnkey project with some national participation. It is expected that these issues will be addressed in the framework of the ongoing international efforts led by the IAEA to solve the problems of nuclear fuel supply and spent fuel disposal for new countries embarking on nuclear power programmes for peaceful applications.
2.3.2. Project management
As previously mentioned, the first NPP would be managed mainly by AECS in cooperation with the Ministry of Electricity. No NEPIO has been established, as required by IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NG-T-3.6. However, a higher steering committee for an NPP (reporting to the Prime Minister) was established in 2009, with powers and responsibilities similar to those of a NEPIO. Moreover, two committees were also established in 2009. AECS is responsible for the reactor engineering aspects, regulatory, nuclear safety, and nuclear fuel cycle issues. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Electricity will deal with issues such as the technical infrastructure related to electric power plants and the national grid.
In 2008 and 2009, AECS produced two technical reports on the main criteria for selecting a future NPP in the Syrian Arab Republic. Older reports are also available at the Ministry of Electricity. However, these reports date back to 1980 and deal with a Soviet NPP design.
In the case of the Syrian Arab Republic, there is an understanding of the required national strategy for accomplishing Phase II of introducing the first NPP. The draft User Requirements for introducing the first NPP are being prepared and can serve as a starting point for a comprehensive report.
2.3.3. Project funding
It is expected that the Syrian Government, with possible support from regional funding sources, will fund the first NPP. However, a financial and economic evaluation would have been one of the important outputs of the technical cooperation project with the IAEA (SYR/0/020).
2.3.4. Electric grid development
The present and future electric grid capacity in the Syrian Arab Republic is adequate to incorporate an NPP as a base load source. However, the present grid stability needs further improvement. Currently, regional interconnection with seven Arab countries in addition to Turkey is available. The electric grid interconnection around the Mediterranean is planned to be completed in the next 10 years.
2.3.5. Sites
As previously mentioned, several documents from a previous study for site specification and an environmental impact assessment (EIA) are available. However, these documents need detailed review and evaluation. According to the EIA, AECS is responsible and has good expertise.
2.3.6. Public awareness
Perceptions and awareness of the NPP tend to vary greatly between the public and experts. Gaining an informed understanding of public perception and awareness of nuclear risk will promote a more enhanced policy and decision making process. Thus, public awareness of nuclear risk is an important factor to activate stakeholder activities and mechanisms for communication with different stakeholders in the Syrian Arab Republic, especially in knowing that stakeholder involvement may pose a challenge. At the national level, the Syrian Government, especially the Ministries of Information (media), Electricity and Education and the AECS, will play a dominant role in raising public awareness about nuclear power; support from national stakeholders and local communities will be essential for the sustainability of any Syrian nuclear power programme.
2.4. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN CONSTRUCTION OF NPPs
The Syrian Arab Republic needs to agree with the IAEA on a technical cooperation project with the objective of establishing technical specifications and conducting an economic evaluation to obtain the most technically beneficial and economically advantageous NPP; to select the most favorable NPP depending on technical, safety, economic, financial and performance characteristics; and to identify site parameters affecting plant design. Also, the project should aim to establish a national coordination framework for the national nuclear power programme, to help establish a legal framework and a national technical qualification system, and to evaluate the Syrian development status regarding nuclear infrastructure and user requirements for introducing the first NPP.
2.5. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN OPERATION OF NPPs
It is expected that the first NPP will be operated by the PEEGT at the Ministry of Electricity.
2.6. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN DECOMMISSIONING OF NPPs
Not applicable at this stage.
2.7. FUEL CYCLE, INCLUDING WASTE MANAGEMENT
Fuel cycle management will be part of any negotiations with a potential NPP supplier. However, a relevant policy, strategy and plans will still need to be worked on. AECS has experience in dealing with radiological waste from medical and industrial applications, in addition to understanding the implication and handling of radioactive waste.
2.8. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
2.8.1. R&D organizations
The research infrastructure at the AECS is especially devoted to research programmes addressing the peaceful application of nuclear energy. The AECS is responsible for defining the basis of the national policy and the related plans and programmes regarding the peaceful utilization of nuclear energy in the Syrian Arab Republic. This includes executing and supporting research, analysis and studies that might lead to scientific, technological and economic development related to the utilization of nuclear energy; establishing research and training centres, laboratories and test facilities; educating personnel in the nuclear field; cooperating with universities and related organizations; and preparing and implementing decrees and regulations to determine the basis for nuclear and radiological safety.
The AECS conducts experimental and theoretical studies at its laboratories and implements projects with international and local institutions. This includes R&D activities related to:
Reactor physics and shielding calculation using adequate analysis tools;
Thermal hydraulic and reactor safety analysis, with special emphasis on research reactors;
Reactor kinetics to measure selected miniature neutron source reactor (MNSR) kinetic parameters;
Radiation protection with a focus on medical and industrial applications;
Advanced non-destructive testing expertise with application in oil and other industry branches;
Activities related to medical radioisotope production.
2.8.2. Development of advanced nuclear technologies
Not applicable.
2.8.3. International cooperation and initiatives
The cooperative activities related to nuclear applications are performed by the AECS in cooperation with the IAEA. Over the past three decades, the AECS has implemented many technical cooperation and coordinated research projects with the IAEA. The AECS received IAEA experts in different fields, such as in energy planning, research reactor INSAR mission, radiation protection and radiological regulation.
In addition, the IAEA’s technical cooperation and coordinated research projects (CRPs) proved to be important tools for promoting national research activities in different fields of interest in nuclear technology. The following are relevant technical cooperation projects and CRPs implemented during the past decade:
Technical cooperation project (SYR/0/006) Energy and Nuclear Power Planning Study: On Analysis of Energy and Electricity Demand Projection in the Syrian Arab Republic (covering the period 1999–2030);
Comparative Assessment of Electricity Generation Options (RAS/0/043);
Assessing the Economic Viability of Alternative Energy Supply Options to Meet Energy and Water Challenges in ARASIA Region (RAS/2/017);
Technical and Economic Feasibility Study and Site Selection for a Nuclear Power Plant (SYR/0/020);
Supporting Strategic Planning to Meet Future Energy Needs in ARASIA Member States (RAS/0/052);
CRP (CRP12216) Safety Significance of Postulated Initiating Events for Different Research Reactor Types and Assessment of Analytical Tools (J7.10.10);
CRP (CRP15044) Innovative Methods in Research Reactor Analysis: Benchmark against Experimental Data on Neutronics and Thermal Hydraulic Computational Methods and Tools for Operation and Safety Analysis of Research Reactors;
Improving Utilization of Miniature Neutron Source Reactor (SYR/4/009);
Energy and Nuclear Power Planning Study (SYR/0/006);
Nuclear Safety (SYR/9/005);
Research Reactor (SYR/4/002);
Nuclear Analytical Laboratory (SYR/0/004);
Uranium Recovery from Phosphoric Acid (SYR/3/003);
Nuclear Electronics (SYR/4/003), Nuclear Electronics (Phase II) (SYR/4/005);
Waste Management (SYR/9/004);
Human Resource Development and Nuclear Technology Support (SYR/0/019).
2.9. HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
The AECS has strengthened education and training in radiation protection since the early 1990s. The AECS, in cooperation with the IAEA, established a postgraduate educational course (PGEC) in Radiation Protection and the Safety of Radioactive Sources that has been running since 2000. The language of instruction is Arabic and the syllabus is provided by the IAEA. In 2006, the AECS and the IAEA, in collaboration with the University of Damascus, upgraded this PGEC into a Masters level course. The course is now self-dependent at the university. More than 240 students (primarily from countries in Asia and Africa) have graduated as radiation protection officers, and 71 of those graduates are Syrian citizens.
The AECS and Damascus University established the Nuclear Engineering Section at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. The section teaches nuclear engineering at the undergraduate level. The undergraduate programme runs over a 5 year period. The first three years are devoted to basic study and the last two years to specialization in the field of nuclear engineering.
The nuclear engineering programme comprises 24 courses: 70 units for theory and 38 units for laboratory experiments and code calculations. The last year includes a final study project related to running research activities at the AECS. The main courses of the undergraduate programme are the following: reactor engineering, reactor physics, reactor safety, thermal hydraulic analysis, fuel cycle, fuel management, waste management, radiation protection, reactor shielding, radiation application, reactor dynamic and energy system analysis.
The Miniature Neutron Source Reactor (MNSR) is used as a training tool to conduct selected nuclear engineering experiments. MNSR also provides a unique opportunity for students to conduct experiments and develop some skills.
The AECS also educates personnel working in the nuclear field in its research laboratories and offers continuous training courses related to safety and radiation protection.
The AECS established the Nuclear Science and Technology Training Centre (NSTTC) in February 2010. The strategy of the NSTTC is to meet the training plans and needs of the AECS, the Government and the private sector, in addition to regional and international organizations. It aims to establish a dynamic structure capable of considering and assessing the national training needs and setting plans to build training programmes to meet these needs.
The NSTTC has a steering committee of qualified researchers (PhDs) working in the different scientific departments at the AECS. This committee plans the annual training programme, approves the training topics for each activity, qualifies the training content and evaluates the outcomes of each activity.
The NSTTC is located at AECS headquarters in downtown Damascus. This centre has six well equipped lecturing rooms (e.g. with PCs, overhead projectors, white boards and WLAN service). Each room can accommodate up to 45 students. In addition, an immediate translation facility is also available in each room, when needed. Moreover, an auditorium that can accommodate up to 250 persons is also available for training courses hosting a large number of participants. A secretariat office with internet access is made available for the convenience of lecturers and students.
By the end of January 2014, the interactive training hall (ITH) was launched. The class was furnished with thirteen PCs (12 working stations and a manager). An advanced program was installed. This program has a variety of properties such as lesson planner, locking student controls and blanking student screens, monitor mode, showing to students, interactive white board, audio monitoring, using audio support, show application, chatting with students, help requests, transferring files, distributing files, sending and collecting work, remotely launching applications on student workstations and question and answer module manage student resources. All PCs are connected to the Internet and are prepared to facilitate e-learning courses and videoconferencing.
The AECS provides training and other services in Arabic for Arabic speaking trainees. Training and the same services for trainees from the region are also provided in English, with translation into Arabic when deemed necessary.
All lecturers, except in very few cases, are AECS staff who speak English fluently. Trainees complimented the lecturers’ teaching experience, and their ability to transfer their knowledge to the trainees.
For practical sessions, a well equipped lab for radiation protection experiments is also available next to the lecture rooms. More specific training in radiation protection is carried out in the Protection and Safety Department of the AECS. A specialized diploma and a Master’s programme in Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources are carried out in collaboration with the Physics Department at the University of Damascus.
This training centre, with its qualified and adequate staff, is responsible for managing and implementing the training courses. It also ensures smooth running and the high quality of the courses and that all needs of the trainees and lecturers are met, including conducting sight-seeing tours, confirming flight reservations for participants in the courses and providing entry visas, in some cases.
All training activities have an approved set of procedures for quality control and quality assurance. However, a proper quality management system is under preparation.
2.10. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
Communication is currently discontinued and shall be resumed in the appropriate framework in due course.
2.11. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
The AECS is the governmental body responsible by law for building competence to respond to radiological or nuclear emergencies in the Syrian Arab Republic (Legislative Decree No. 64). RNRO is responsible for preparing, reviewing and supervising the national emergency plan (NEP) for radiological and nuclear emergencies. The NEP was written on the basis of the threat assessment in the Syrian Arab Republic. Categories III, IV and V are recognized in the country. For Category V, IAEA recommendations for intervention levels have been adopted. IAEA intervention levels and action levels for agricultural countermeasures were adopted and included in the NEP. In addition, IAEA operational intervention levels (OILs) were adopted in the plan. In the event that the Syrian Arab Republic develops an NPP, the NEP needs to include threat categories I and II and give more organizations responsibilities in accordance with IAEA guidance.
Categories I and II do not apply for the Syrian Arab Republic as it has no long term protective action planning zone (LPZ). The NEP for response to radiological and nuclear emergencies was finalized and issued under AECS Decision No. 1427 of 2002 dated 20 November 2002.
The 24/7 notification point has been established since November 2003. Three emergency teams, each consisting of four personnel and two vehicles, were nominated and assigned a weekly shift. A detailed work plan to review and coordinate the on-site and off-site emergency plans and to perform drills at different levels was established. The NEP nominated many governmental organizations as cooperating organizations. All cooperating organizations nominated in the plan provided contributions to the plan, and agreed to the roles allocated to each of them. Classification of accidents is stipulated in the plan for categories III and IV. The NEP describes two ways of providing information to the public: through local authorities via loudspeakers and posters and/or through various national media sectors such as online or print newspapers, radio and television.
The response to emergencies involving a combination of a nuclear or radiological emergency and a conventional emergency such as an earthquake is under consideration. Any threat associated with nuclear facilities in other country, especially neighbouring countries, is also under consideration. Non-radiological threats (hazardous chemicals) to people on and off the site that are associated with the practice are identified. Finally, the NEP was updated by the RNRO and the draft was thoroughly revised and discussed by the Committee on Radiation Protection Safety and Security of Radiation Sources. The new NEP is in compliance with IAEA Safety Standards No. No. GSR Part 7, Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency (2015). The updated NEP is waiting for AECS Management Board approval.
3. 3. NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
3.1. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
3.1.1. Regulatory authority(ies)
Figure 3 is a chart indicating the position of the Radiological and Nuclear Regulatory Office within the AECS organizational structure.
FIG. 3. Organizational structure of the AECS.
Presidential Decree No. 64 of 2005 was issued on 3 August 2005 by the President of the Syrian Arab Republic. This legislative decree complies with the international standards as specified in GSR Part 3 and GSR Part 1, the commitments of the Syrian Government in its letter to the IAEA’s Director General regarding the application of the code of conduct and Security Council Decision No. 1541. It nominates the AECS as:
The regulatory authority for radiation protection and the safety and security of radiation sources;
Responsible for emergency planning and coordination for radiological or nuclear accidents;
The competent authority responsible for issuing approval certificates for package design.
The AECS is required by this legislative decree to establish a regulatory body to carry out the duties assigned by this legislative decree and to appropriately staff it and provide needed resources.
The AECS therefore established the Radiological and Nuclear Regulatory Office (RNRO) by Decision No. 23 of 10 October 2006.
By the above mentioned legislative decree, the AECS is empowered to:
Prepare regulations, to be issued by the Prime Minister;
Issue authorizations;
Perform inspections; inspectors have the powers of the judicial police;
Impose enforcement actions;
Undertake measures to detect illicit trafficking;
Verify the absence of contamination exceeding permissible limits in the goods imported to or crossing into the Syrian Arab Republic;
Promote a protection, safety and security culture among the public.
Moreover, this legislative decree prescribes sanctions in case of non-compliance. The sanctions scheme takes into account the risk associated with the radiation sources. It also defines the civil liability for damages due to radiological or nuclear accidents.
By this legislative decree the Radiation Protection and Safety and Security of Radiation Sources Committee was established to support the AECS.
3.1.2. Licensing process
All regulatory functions are controlled by: (1) Ministerial Decree No. 134 of 17 January 2007, General Regulations on Radiation Protection and Safety and Security of Radiation Sources and (2) Detailed Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials (Decision No. 206/2016 of 15 December 2016) based on IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-6, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (2012).
The process for obtaining a licence from the regulatory authority is as follows:
The licensee submits an application form to the AEC–RNRO, containing all detailed data and information about the activity (responsibilities, radiation sources, location, workers, monitoring, emergencies, etc.). For some activities, the radiation protection programme should be attached to the form.
The RNRO assesses the application and radiation protection programme. If the submitted documents are sufficient, the RNRO pays a visit to the site to inspect it and check the availability of safety arrangements.
Only then may a decision be taken to issue an authorization. However, if there is lack of some information, data or safety arrangements, a letter shall be sent to the licensee for further action.
3.2. NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS ON NUCLEAR POWER
Currently, there are no specific national laws regulating nuclear power in the Syrian Arab Republic. However, Presidential Decree No. 64 of 2005 is the law through which the regulatory body in the Syrian Arab Republic regulates and supervises the Syrian MNSR and related materials.
MNSR Research Reactor: This research reactor was supplied and installed under the International Atomic Energy Agency Project and Supply Agreement. Regulatory supervision of the research reactor, which includes an inspection and reporting programme, licensing of facility and operational staff, and mandatory regulatory documents, is in line with the guidance in the code of conduct on the safety of research reactors. This regulatory supervision is carried out by the RNRO of the AECS. The operation licence of the MNSR is renewed on a yearly basis. The MNSR staff licence is renewed every two years.
Articles 7 and 8 and appendices 1 and 2 of the instructions on licensing radiation practices, AECS Director General’s Decision No. 623 of 2008, deal with the licensing of the import and export of radiation sources, which are in compliance with the Supplementary Guidance on Import and Export Controls.
The AECS is the only organization concerned with the control of public exposure to radiation in the Syrian Arab Republic. The Department of Protection and Safety is the technical department for radiation protection and measurements. AECS laboratories have adequate equipment and can perform the required measurements for a comprehensive environmental monitoring programme. In addition, Article 61 of the general regulations prohibit the discharge of radioactive materials from authorized practices or radiation sources — including radioactive waste — into the environment unless it is within the limits stated by the authorization. It is the responsibility of the users to carry out environmental monitoring through a programme approved by the RNRO.
Radioactive Waste Management: Chapter 14 of Legislation Decree No. 134 states the national policy and strategy of radioactive waste management and allocates the responsibilities in which users shall minimize the amount of the waste generated by their practices. Processing of radioactive waste (collection, pretreatment and conditioning for final disposal) is managed, in a secure and safe manner, and stored in long term storage at the central facility at the Atomic Energy Commission of Syria. Since 2005, disused sealed radioactive sources (DSRS) are returned to suppliers (repatriation). However, old DSRS (Category 4 and 5) are stored and have been recently managed in accordance with IAEA recommendations on dismantling, conditioning and disposal.
Emergency Situations: Per Sectioni 2.11, the AECS is the governmental body responsible by law for building competence to respond to radiological or nuclear emergencies in the Syrian Arab Republic (Legislative Decree No. 64). The RNRO is responsible for preparing, reviewing and supervising the NEP for radiological and nuclear emergencies. The NEP was written on the basis of the threat assessment in the Syrian Arab Republic. Categories III, IV and V are recognized in the country. Categories I and II do not apply to the Syrian Arab Republic as it has no long term protective action planning zone (LPZ). The NEP for response to radiological and nuclear emergencies was finalized and issued under AECS Decision No. 1427 of 20 November 2002. A detailed work plan to review and coordinate the on-site and off-site emergency plans and to perform drills at different levels was established. The NEP nominated many governmental organizations as cooperating organizations. All cooperating organizations nominated in the plan provided contributions, and agreed to the roles allocated to each of them in the plan. Classification of accidents is stipulated in the plan for categories III and IV.
For Category V, IAEA recommendations for intervention levels have been adopted. IAEA intervention levels and action levels for agricultural countermeasures were adopted and included in the national emergency plan. In addition, IAEA operational intervention levels (OILs) were adopted in the plan. In the event that the Syrian Arab Republic develops an NPP, the NEP needs to be updated to include threat categories I and II and give more organizations responsibilities in the plan in accordance with IAEA guidance.
The organizational structure and competencies of the existing regulatory authority in the Syrian Arab Republic will have to be rearranged in order to be able to regulate NPPs in accordance with international guidance and the relevant IAEA safety standards.
An analysis of the operational and long term needs for specialists is required, and recruitment and training plans need to be detailed in order to employ sufficient staff with suitable qualifications and expertise along with the development of the nuclear power programme.
In this respect, the Syrian Arab Republic is in the process of preparing a national nuclear law in line with the legislative requirements for the nuclear power programme for electricity production. The Syrian competent authorities are also working to establish a follow-up structure for the nuclear power project according to IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NG-G-3.1, Milestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power.
International and regional cooperation and exchange of regulatory information with the regulatory authorities of countries with advanced nuclear power programmes and those with new ones need to be arranged. IAEA assistance is required for the standardization and harmonization of the approaches followed.
APPENDIX 1: INTERNATIONAL, MULTILATERAL AND BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
1. Agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency
Abb. | Title | In force | Status |
P&I | Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the IAEA | 1989 | Party |
VC | Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage | Non-party | |
CPPNM | Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material | Non-party | |
CPPNM-AM | Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material | Non-party | |
ENC | Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident | 1987 | In process of ratification |
AC | Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency | 1987 | Signatory |
JP | Joint Protocol Relating to the Application of the Vienna Convention and the Paris Convention | Non-party | |
NS | Convention on Nuclear Safety | 1994 | Party |
RADW | Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management | Non-party | |
PAVC | Protocol to Amend the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage | Non-party | |
SUPP | Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage | Non-party | |
RSA | Revised Supplementary Agreement Concerning the Provision of Technical Assistance by the IAEA (RSA) | 1981 | Signatory |
2. Safeguards agreements
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons — Party, 1969.
Agreement between the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic and the IAEA for the Application of Safeguards in Connection with the NPT, 1992.
The Syrian Arab Republic has expressed support for the Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources.
Cooperation agreements with IAEA in the area of nuclear power.
Project and Supply Agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic and the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Transfer of a Miniature Neutron Source Reactor and Enriched Uranium, 28 February 1992.
Cooperative Agreement for Arab States in Asia for Research, Development and Training Related to Nuclear Science and Technology (ARASIA), 2002.
Bilateral agreements with other countries or organizations signed/ratified by the Syrian Arab Republic in the field of nuclear power.
Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, 1999.
Agreement between the Government of India and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, 1980.
Scientific and technical agreements with other governments such as Argentina, Belarus, China, Egypt, Japan, Lebanon, Pakistan and Turkey.
The Syrian Arab Republic is one of the founding Member States of the Arab Atomic Energy Agency (AAEA), 1966.
The Syrian Arab Republic has scientific and technical cooperative relations with regional and international organizations such as the International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) and COMSATS.
APPENDIX 2: MAIN ORGANIZATIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND COMPANIES INVOLVED IN NUCLEAR POWER RELATED ACTIVITIES
National Nuclear Energy Authority | |
Atomic Energy Commission of Syria | 17 Nissan Street-Kafersouseh P. O. Box 6091, Damascus Tel.: 00963-11-2132580 Fax: 00963-11-6112289 Email: atomic@aec.org.sy www.aec.org.sy |
Other organizations | |
Ministry of Electricity | 17 Nissan Street-Kafersouseh Damascus Tel.: 00963-11-2133972. Fax: 00963-11-2229062. Email: moe@net.sy www.moe.gov.sy |
Public Establishment for the Generation and Transmission of Electricity | 17 Nissan Street-Kafersouseh Damascus Tel.: 00963-112229062 - /2129981 Fax: 00963-11- 2127732 Email: peegt@net.sy, peegt@gov.sy http://www.peegt.gov.sy |
Coordinator Information
Prof. Ibrahim Othman
Director General
Atomic Energy Commission of Syria