D. Mikkelsen 1, G. Bateman 2,
D. Boucher 3, J. W. Connor 4,
Yu. N. Dnestrovskij 5, W. Dorland 6,
A. Fukuyama 7, M. Greenwald 8,
W. A. Houlberg 9, S. Kaye 1,
J. E. Kinsey 10, A. H. Kritz 2,
M. Marinucci 11, Y. Ogawa 12, D. Schissel 10,
H. Shirai 13, P. M. Stubberfield 14,
M. F. Turner 4, G. Vlad 11, R. E. Waltz 10,
J. Weiland 15
1 PPPL, Princeton, USA
2 Lehigh University, Lehigh, USA
3 ITER San Diego JWS, USA
4 EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre,Oxon, UK
5 Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
6 U. Maryland, College Park, USA
7 Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
8 MIT, Cambridge, USA
9 ORNL, Oak Ridge, USA
10 GA, San Diego, USA
11 Associazione Euratom/ENEA sulla Fusione, Frascati, Italy
12 U. Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
13 JAERI, Naka, Japan
14 JET, Abingdon, UK
15 Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
Abstract
A number of proposed tokamak thermal transport models are tested by
comparing their predictions with measurements from several tokamaks. The
necessary data have been provided for a total of 75 discharges from C-mod,
DIII-D , JET , JT-60U , T10, and TFTR . A standard prediction methodology has been
developed, and three codes have been benchmarked; these `standard' codes have
been relied on for testing most of the transport models. While a wide range of
physical transport processes has been tested, no single model has emerged as
clearly superior to all competitors for simulating H-mode discharges. In order
to winnow the field, further tests of the effect of sheared flows and of the
`stiffness' of transport are planned. Several of the models have been used to
predict ITER performance, with widely varying results. With some transport
models ITER's predicted fusion power depends strongly on the `pedestal'
temperature, but 1GW (Q=10) is predicted for most models if the
pedestal temperature is at least 4 keV.
IAEA 1999