International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Research Applications and Utilization of Accelerators
|
|
ADS/ND-11 Analyses of Transients for 400 MWth-Class EFIT Accelerator Driven Transmuter with the SIMMER–III Code P. Liu1, X.N. Chen1, F. Gabrielli1, M. Flad1, W. Maschek1, A. Rineiski1, S. Wang1, K. Morita2, M.M. Rahman2, and Y. Ege2 1Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies (IKET), Karlsruhe, Germany Corresponding Author: ping.liu@iket.fzk.de European R&D for ADS design and fuel development is driven in the 6th FP of the EU by the
EUROTRANS Programme. In EUROTRANS, two ADS design routes are followed, the XT–ADS Basically two different safety areas have been analyzed. Firstly, protected and unprotected transients which are initiated by a mismatch of power-to-flow or resulting from a beam disturbance or overpower situation. Secondly a stream generator tube rupture (SGTR) accident has been investigated with its potential impact on the core region. From the safety point of view all ADTs with a high load of Minor Actinides are characterized with a “zero” Doppler fuel feedback, a high void worth for lead and a very small beta-effective. In addition the massive Helium production from the transmutation process leads to high pressure potentials in the plena. Although the boiling point of Pb coolant is high, voiding may take place via two routes. It can be triggered either by a pin failure with gas release from the plena or the dragging in of steam into the core after a SGTR accident. The transient scenarios presented here are mostly unprotected (beam-on scenarios): spurious beam
trip (BT), unprotected transient overpower (UTOP), unprotected loss of flow (ULOF) and unprotected
blockage accident (UBA). As the high temperature and transient behavior of the MgO based
fuel and the T91 cladding is connected with large uncertainties, the unprotected accidents with
the potential of fuel failure and gas release deserve special attention. Extensive investigations have
been performed for the UBA as it represents a route into pin failure and a blockage accident has
been reported in the past in a HLM cooled submarine. As fuel and clad might be swept out of the
core region after an UBA the release of material and possible re-freezing or deposition on structures
was also investigated experimentally, simultaneously validating the SIMMER code.
|