SWITZERLAND
(Updated 2019)
PREAMBLE
This report provides information on the status and development of nuclear power programmes in Switzerland, including factors related to the effective planning, decision making and implementation of the nuclear power programme that together lead to safe and economical operations of nuclear power plants (NPPs).
The CNPP summarizes organizational and industrial aspects of nuclear power programmes and provides information about the relevant legislative, regulatory and international framework in Switzerland.
Following the Fukushima Daiichi accident in March 2011, the Federal Council announced that the pending procedures for handling applications for general licences of new NPPs had been suspended. In the course of 2011, the Federal Council and Parliament made the decision to withdraw from nuclear energy on a step by step basis and laid the foundations for a new energy policy (Energy Strategy 2050). The intention is to decommission Switzerland’s five NPPs when they reach the end of their service life and not to replace them with new ones. Despite this decision, Switzerland intends to keep and further develop its nuclear competency, all while fostering its collaboration with the IAEA with regard to nuclear safety, security and safeguards. It is intended that the first NPP, Mühleberg, will be shut down by the end of December 2019.
1. COUNTRY ENERGY OVERVIEW
1.1. ENERGY INFORMATION
1.1.1. Energy policy
Following the Fukushima accident in 2011, the Federal Council decided to phase out nuclear power: the five existing NPPs will continue operating until the end of their lifetimes as long they meet the safety requirements of the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI). The first NPP, Mühleberg, will be shut down by the end of December 2019, following a decision by the operator. The permit process for three new NPPs was halted. The phase out decision stemmed from the fact that public opinion — split 50/50 before 2011 — had become overwhelmingly anti-nuclear. Under these conditions, approval of new NPPs in foreseeable referendums had therefore become impossible. The phase out decision has also been endorsed by Parliament (National Council and Council of States).
The nuclear phase out requires a new energy policy to be formulated to replace some 40% of the current electricity supply coming from nuclear power (assuming electricity demand growth can be eventually stabilized in the years to come). The gap is to be filled by a mix of options, including ambitious efficiency measures, accelerated promotion of new renewable energies and additional large hydro, some gas fired (gas turbine combined cycle) and combined heat and power plants, as well as increased electricity trade. Gas fired power, a novelty for Switzerland, will as well be challenging for the national climate policy goal.
Public consultation on the new energy policy, the Energy Strategy 2050(1), took place from 28 September 2012 to 31 January 2013. The Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) evaluated the statements and adjusted the project accordingly. The Federal Council presented its message to Parliament in September 2013, leading to the new Energy Act. A final vote of Parliament took place in September 2016. A public referendum in May 2017 confirmed the new Energy Act. On 1 January 2018, the Energy Act entered into force.
1.1.2. Estimated available energy
TABLE 1. ESTIMATED AVAILABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Fossil fuels | Nuclear | Renewables | ||||
Solid* | Liquid | Gas | Uranium | Hydro | Other renewable | |
Total amount in specific units | 0.190 | —** | —** | —** | —** | —** |
Total amount in exajoules (EJ) |
* Million tonnes.
** —: data not available.
1.1.3. Energy statistics
TABLE 2. ENERGY STATISTICS
2000 | 2005 | 2015 | 2018 | Annual av. growth rate 2000–2018 (%) | |
Total energy consumption (EJ)a | 1.107 | 1.138 | 1.088 | 1.086 | -0.21 |
Solidsb | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.005 | -1.16 |
Liquids | 0.536 | 0.533 | 0.458 | 0.457 | –0.79 |
Gases | 0.102 | 0.117 | 0.125 | 0.126 | 0.24 |
Nuclear | 0.272 | 0.240 | 0.221 | 0.23 | -0.42 |
Hydro | 0.136 | 0.118 | 0.131 | 0.134 | –0.2 |
Other renewables and waste | 0.081 | 0.093 | 0.134 | 0.14 | 0.59 |
Total energy production (EJ) | 0.308 | 0.291 | 0.334 | 0.389 | 0.81 |
Solidsb | |||||
Liquids | |||||
Gases | |||||
Nuclear | 0.091 | 0.080 | 0.074 | 0.09 | –0.1 |
Hydro | 0.136 | 0.118 | 0.131 | 0.141 | 0.05 |
Other renewables and waste | 0.081 | 0.093 | 0.129 | 0.151 | 0.7 |
Net imports (imports - exports) | 0.856 | 0.915 | 0.812 | 0.811 | –0.45 |
Source: Latest available data; Swiss Energy Statistics 2011, SFOE.
a Energy consumption = primary energy consumption + net imports (imports – exports) of secondary energy.
b Solid fuels include coal, lignite.
1.2. THE ELECTRICITY SYSTEM
1.2.1. Electricity policy and decision making process
The Federal Electricity Supply Act (StromVG, effective since 1 January 2008) creates the framework for a phased liberalization of the Swiss electricity market. The market was partially opened for eligible customers(2) in 2008. Full market liberalization will be introduced on the basis of a federal resolution, which will be subject to an optional referendum.
In order to increase the share of electricity produced from renewable energy sources, an amendment was made to the Federal Electricity Supply Act, introducing compensatory feed-in remuneration to cover the cost of electricity from renewable energy sources.
1.2.2. Structure of electric power sector
At present, Switzerland’s electricity market is highly fragmented. The supply of electricity is assured by some 650 electricity distributors, including seven generation and transmission companies. There are also approximately 80 larger Swiss electricity producing companies. Many tasks are undertaken by communes, which also supply water and gas. In some cantons and cities, a single vertically integrated company is responsible for the entire supply chain, while in other cantons these are provided by a variety of companies. The public sector stake in the capital stock of electricity supply companies is currently around 87.5%, while the remaining 12.5% is held by private sector companies (domestically and abroad).
Switzerland regulated grid usage in the Federal Electricity Supply Act. It stipulates that the high voltage transmission grid should be operated by the national grid company, Swissgrid, which guarantees non-discriminatory access to the grid for all companies. In accordance with the Federal Electricity Supply Act, the ownership of an ultra high voltage network was transferred to Swissgrid before 1 January 2013. The act also stipulates the unbundling of previously vertically integrated companies.(3)
ElCom is Switzerland’s independent regulatory authority in the electricity sector. It is responsible for monitoring compliance with the Swiss Federal Electricity Act, taking all necessary related decisions and pronouncing rulings where required. ElCom monitors electricity prices and rules as a judicial authority on disputes relating to network access and payment of cost covering feed-in of electricity produced from renewable energy. It also monitors electricity security of supply and regulates issues related to international electricity transmission and trading.
1.2.3. Main indicators
In 2017, hydropower’s share of total electricity production was 59%, while nuclear power contributed 33%. The remaining 8.2% is covered by fossil and renewable sources. Tables 3 and 4 provide further information on the electricity production, consumption and capacity.
TABLE 3. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION AND CAPACITY
2000 | 2005 | 2018 | Annual av. growth rate 2000–2018 (%) | |
Capacity of electrical plants (TW·h) | ||||
Thermal | 0.804 | 0.825 | 0.941 | 0.137 |
Nuclear | 13.239 | 13.355 | 15.442 | 0.7 |
Hydro | 3.200 | 3.220 | 3.533 | 0.333 |
Wind | 0.003 | 0.012 | 0.075 | 22.4 |
Geothermal | ||||
Solar | 0.016 | 0.028 | 1.664 | 33.68 |
Total | 17.262 | 17.440 | 20.839 | 1.18 |
Electricity production (TW·h) | ||||
Thermal | 2.372 | 2.932 | 3.022 | 3.61 |
Nuclear | 37.851 | 32.759 | 37.428 | –0.23 |
Hydro | 24.949 | 22.020 | 24.414 | –1.3 |
Wind | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.120 | 25.18 |
Geothermal | ||||
Other renewables | 0.173 | 0.199 | 2.174 | 16.06 |
Total* | 65.348 | 57.918 | 62.360 | –0.37 |
Total electricity consumption (TW·h) | 52.373 | 57.330 | 58.032 1 | 0.67 |
Source: Latest available data; Swiss Energy Statistics 2011, SFOE.
* Electricity transmission losses are not deducted.
TABLE 4. ENERGY RELATED RATIOS
2000 | 2005 | 2015 | 2018 | |
Energy consumption (GJ/capita) | 153.1 | 152.1 | 147.2 | 133.2 |
Electricity consumption (kW·h/capita) | 7272.0 | 7685.0 | 7432 | 6956.0 |
Electricity production/energy production (%) | 76.4 | 71.7 | 71.9 | 72.9 |
Nuclear/total electricity (%) | 38.2 | 38.0 | 34 | 35.6 |
Ratio of external dependency (%)* | 77.3 | 81.0 | 75 | 65.3 |
Source: Latest available data; Swiss Energy Statistics 2011, SFOE.
* Net import/total energy consumption.
2. NUCLEAR POWER SITUATION
2.1. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
2.1.1. Overview
2.1.1.1. Development of a nuclear programme
In November 1945, the Government established the independent Atomic Energy Committee with the mandate to advise the Government in all civilian and military matters dealing with nuclear energy. On 18 March 1957, Parliament ratified the Statute of the IAEA, which entered into force on 29 July 1957. In 1969, Switzerland signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which Parliament ratified on 9 March 1977.
As early as 1946, Brown, Boveri & Cie (BBC, now ABB Group) took the first steps to build a team of physicists and to launch a development programme. BBC was later joined by Sulzer Brothers and Escher Wyss. Initial studies dealt with graphite–carbon dioxide reactor concepts, but from 1952 on, the development concentrated on heavy water moderated reactors, with subsequent planning of the research reactor DIORIT. In 1955, more than 150 private companies joined forces and formed Reactor Ltd to build and operate the new, privately owned research centre in Würenlingen, with the two reactors on the site SAPHIR and DIORIT. In 1960, the Government took over the research centre, known by its abbreviation EIR (Eidgenössisches Institut für Reaktorforschung). In 1988, the merger of EIR and SIN (Schweizerisches Institut für Nuklearphysik) led to the creation of the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI).
In Switzerland, the nuclear age began on 30 April 1957, when the SAPHIR research reactor went critical under the responsibility of Swiss scientists and engineers. This pool reactor had been purchased in 1955 from the Government of the United States of America, after being exhibited in Geneva during the First International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy. SAPHIR was shut down permanently at the end of 1993.
DIORIT, the first reactor designed and constructed in Switzerland, reached criticality on 15 August 1960. It was moderated and cooled by heavy water; the fuel was initially natural uranium; a special loop allowed for the testing of power reactor fuel elements. DIORIT was shut down permanently in 1977. At the end of 2003, all radioactive material was removed from the reactor building.
In 1962, construction began on the experimental nuclear power reactor in Lucens, a 30 MW(th), 6 MW(e), heavy water moderated, carbon dioxide cooled reactor located in an underground cavern. Criticality was reached in late 1966 and commissioning in early 1968. In spite of numerous difficulties, the supply consortium led by Sulzer Brothers had demonstrated that Swiss industry was capable of building nuclear plants. The goal was the development of a small to medium sized power reactor fuelled with natural uranium within a massive containment system. As enriched uranium became readily available during the mid-1960s, the unit size of commercially offered light water reactor (LWR) NPPs increased drastically and Swiss utilities started construction of such plants very early on. Interest in the Lucens reactor type decreased, however, and further large expenses for such a development could not be justified. The decision was taken to operate the reactor until the end of 1969. However, on 21 January 1969, the plant was abruptly put out of service by a partial core meltdown that destroyed the integrity of the primary system and released radioactivity into the cavern. After decontamination, decommissioning and termination of intermediate storage of radioactive material, the entire site was prepared for unrestricted reuse in 2003.
2.1.1.2. Nuclear power plant projects
In August 1965, a turnkey contract was awarded by Nordostschweizerische Kraftwerke AG (NOK) to a consortium made up of Westinghouse International Atomic Power Company and BC for the supply of a 350 MW(e) plant equipped with a pressurized water reactor (PWR) and two turbo generators (Beznau). In late 1967, NOK took the option to order a duplicate of the first unit. Beznau I reached criticality by the end of June 1969, and Beznau II in October 1972.
Also in 1965, Bernische Kraftwerke AG (BKW) chose a 306 MW(e) plant equipped with a boiling water reactor (BWR) manufactured by General Electric and twin turbo generators from BBC (Mühleberg). In July 1971, full power was achieved, but on 28 July 1971 a turbine fire broke out. Sixteen months later the plant was officially handed to the owner.
In 1973, a supply contract was signed by a consortium of Swiss utilities with Kraftwerk Union (Siemens) for the delivery of a 900 MW(e) PWR and turbogenerator (Gösgen). Construction of the plant went very smoothly until the first connection to the grid in February and an 80% power test in March 1979. However, the accident at Three Mile Island on 28 March 1979 led to an eight month delay in its commissioning.
In December 1973, a consortium of Swiss utilities and one German utility awarded a turnkey contract to General Electric Technical Services Overseas (GETSCO) and BBC for the supply of a 940 MW(e) NPP equipped with a BWR (Leibstadt). Construction began in 1974 and the plant was commissioned in December 1984.
2.1.1.3. Political controversy and legal framework
The nuclear controversy began in Switzerland in 1969 with the first signs of local opposition to a nuclear plant project at Kaiseraugst, near Basel. For 20 years, the Kaiseraugst project was to remain centre stage in the nuclear controversy: site permit, local referendums, legal battles, site occupation by opponents in 1975, parliamentary vote in favour of construction in 1985, and finally a parliamentary decision in 1989 to end the project definitively. Further, the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant had a dramatic impact on the political climate. Although some of the necessary permits had already been issued for two planned NPPs at Kaiseraugst and Graben, their construction was subsequently abandoned, as well as other projects in Verbois, Inwil and Rüthi.
The nuclear controversy led to several anti-nuclear initiatives at the federal level:
An attempt to forbid all nuclear plants, both new and those already in operation — rejected by 51.2% of the vote in February 1979.
Aimed at forbidding future nuclear plants, leaving untouched the plants in operation, two initiatives differing only in the treatment to be applied to Leibstadt, then under construction — rejected by 55% of the vote in September 1984.
Nuclear phase out — rejected by 52.9% of the vote in September 1990.
A ten year moratorium on the construction of new NPPs — accepted by 54.6% of the vote in September 1990.
In 1999, two new initiatives were organized aiming at the ban of the construction of new NPPs until 2010 and the closure of all NPPs after a 30 year lifespan — both initiatives were rejected in May 2003 by 58.4% and 66.3%, respectively.
A new Nuclear Energy Act came into force on 1 February 2005 in addition to the new Nuclear Energy Ordinance. It allowed the possibility of building new reactors, with the possibility of a referendum against their construction. There is no time limit to the lifetime of existing NPPs. The general licence is still in place. It introduced a ten year moratorium on the export of nuclear fuel for reprocessing from 2006 to 2016. It also includes provisions for decommissioning, simplifies licensing procedures and introduces the general right of appeal.
During the ten year moratorium on reprocessing, which began in July 2006, spent fuel was stored in Switzerland. Plutonium and uranium gained from reprocessing of spent fuel that was sent abroad before July 2006 is recycled in Swiss NPPs. The radioactive waste arising from reprocessing of spent fuel was returned to Switzerland.
Following the accident in Fukushima, the head of the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC) announced in mid-March 2011 that the pending procedures for handling applications for general licences for new NPPs had been suspended. Then, in the course of 2011, with their decision to withdraw from the use of nuclear energy on a step by step basis the Federal Council and Parliament laid the foundations for a new energy policy, the Energy Strategy 2050. The intention is to decommission Switzerland’s five NPPs when they reach the end of their service life and not to replace them with new ones. According to the Energy Strategy 2050 and the amended Nuclear Energy Act, reprocessing is forbidden indefinitely.
The public consultation on the Energy Strategy 2050 took place from 28 September 2012 to 31 January 2013. The Federal Council presented its message to Parliament in September 2013 in the new Energy Act. A final vote of Parliament took place in September 2016. A public referendum in May 2017 confirmed the new amended provisions of the Energy Act. On 1 January 2018 the new amended act entered into force.
2.1.1.4. Radioactive waste management
The safe disposal of radioactive waste is the responsibility of those parties that produce it, namely the following NPP operators: BKW FMB Energie AG (Mühleberg), KKW Gösgen–Däniken AG, KKW Leibstadt AG, Nordostschweizerische Kraftwerke Baden — now Axpo (Beznau I and II), Energie Ouest Suisse — now Alpiq. In 1972, these operators established the National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra) together with the Government, which is responsible for the disposal of radioactive waste from the health care sector, industry and research and is represented by the Federal Department of Home Affairs.
So far, there are no deep geological repositories in Switzerland. For both low and intermediate level waste (LILW) and high level waste (HLW) repositories, a site selection process is defined in a sectoral plan within the framework of the spatial planning legislation. The Federal Council adopted the conceptual part of the Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories in April 2008, thus initiating a three stage procedure that will result in the designation of suitable sites for deep geological repositories.
The selection — based on safety criteria — of siting regions for geological repositories for HLW and for LILW was the goal of the first stage. Nagra proposed six potential siting regions in October 2008. ENSI, considering the input of a number of expert organizations, approved the six proposals. Following this review process, the SFOE carried out a broad consultation on the first stage at the end of 2010 and submitted a report to the Federal Council. The Federal Council approved all six potential siting regions on 30 November 2011, thus concluding the first stage of the site selection process and initiating the second stage (see Section 2.7).
2.1.2. Current process chart
FIG 1. Current organizational flow chart for decision making of nuclear energy policies.
2.2. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: OVERVIEW
2.2.1. Status and performance of nuclear power plants
Currently, five NPPs at four sites are currently in operation in Switzerland (see Table 5). In addition, there is one research reactor and two central disposal facilities for radioactive waste. Disposal facilities for radioactive waste are also situated in the surroundings of the NPPs. Switzerland’s five NPPs have a total capacity of 3.3 GW, and an annual availability rate of approximately 90%. Figure 2 indicates the sites of the Swiss research reactors and NPPs.
TABLE 5. STATUS AND PERFORMANCE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
Reactor Unit | Type | Net Capacity [MW(e)] |
Status | Operator | Reactor Supplier |
Construction Date |
First Criticality Date |
First Grid Date |
Commercial Date |
Shutdown Date |
UCF for 2018 |
BEZNAU-1 | PWR | 365 | Operational | Axpo AG | WH | 1965-09-01 | 1969-06-30 | 1969-07-17 | 1969-12-09 | 78.3 | |
BEZNAU-2 | PWR | 365 | Operational | Axpo AG | WH | 1968-01-01 | 1971-10-16 | 1971-10-23 | 1972-03-04 | 96.3 | |
GOESGEN | PWR | 1010 | Operational | KKG | KWU | 1973-12-01 | 1979-01-20 | 1979-02-02 | 1979-11-01 | 93.8 | |
LEIBSTADT | BWR | 1220 | Operational | KKL | GETSCO | 1974-01-01 | 1984-03-09 | 1984-05-24 | 1984-12-15 | 74.4 | |
MUEHLEBERG | BWR | 373 | Operational | BKW | GETSCO | 1967-03-01 | 1971-03-08 | 1971-07-01 | 1972-11-06 | 91.9 | |
LUCENS | HWGCR | 6 | Permanent Shutdown | EOS | NGA | 1962-04-01 | 1966-12-29 | 1968-01-29 | 1969-01-21 |
Data source: IAEA - Power Reactor Information System (PRIS). | |||||||||||
Note: Table is completely generated from PRIS data to reflect the latest available information and may be more up to date than the text of the report. |
Source: PRIS database, www.iaea.org/pris; Beznau I + II, www.axpo.ch; Mühleberg, www.bkw-fmb.ch; Gösgen, www.kkg.ch; Leibstadt, www.kkl.ch.
Note: BWR — boiling water reactor; Constr. — construction; GETSCO — General Electric Technical Services Corporation; KWU — Siemens Kraftwerk Union AG; PWR — pressurized water reactor; WH — Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
a Date of first major placing of concrete, usually for the base mat of the reactor building.
b Date of the first connection to the grid.
c Unit capacity factor (UCF) for the latest available year (only applicable to reactors in operation); latest available data.
d —: data not available.
2.2.2. Plant upgrading, plant life management and licence renewals
Over the past few decades, all Swiss NPPs have upgraded their power capacity. At the end of 2012, the nominal net powers were twice 365 MW(e) for the Beznau NPP, 373 MW(e) for the Mühleberg NPP, 985 MW(e) for the Gösgen NPP and 1120 MW(e) for the Leibstadt NPP.
The NPPs Beznau (Units 1 and 2), Gösgen and Leibstadt have unlimited operating licences. In December 2009, DETEC granted an unlimited operating licence for the operator of Mühleberg. This decision was appealed and subsequently approved by the Federal Supreme Court in March 2013. As a result, the operator of Mühleberg NPP and hence all Swiss NPPs have unlimited operating licences.
2.3. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER
2.3.1. Nuclear power development strategy
In 2007, the Government announced a new energy policy which included renewable energies, energy efficiency, energy foreign policy and new large scale power stations, including the replacement of the existing NPPs. In 2008, the three big electricity companies, Alpiq, Axpo and BKW, submitted general licence applications for three new nuclear units at Gösgen, Beznau and Mühleberg, all three on existing nuclear sites (see Section 2.3.5 for more information on these applications).
Following the nuclear accident at the Fukushima NPP in Japan, the head of DETEC suspended the licensing procedure for the new Swiss NPPs. The decision was taken on 14 March 2011.
Following this, ENSI immediately started carrying out a safety review of the existing NPPs. According to an ENSI ordinance, the Swiss NPPs had to participate in the European Union stress tests. The European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG) in charge of this peer review process stated in the final report for Switzerland: “In general, the design and further development of the plants are based on the ‘defence in depth’ concept and in consequence results in good robustness of the plants against severe accidents”. ENSREG recommended “that the regulator assesses the opportunity of requiring more reliance on passive systems for hydrogen management for severe accident conditions. It is also recommended that the regulator considers further studies on the hydrogen management for the venting systems”. Based on the reviews carried out so far, several measures have been taken to optimize safety and security, included in the post-Fukushima action plan. This plan foresees that 45 open points will be dealt with through 2015. The measures were implemented to the greatest extent possible and the action plan is now complete.
On 25 May 2011, the Federal Council decided to phase out nuclear power. The Swiss Parliament (National Council and Council of States) subsequently confirmed the Federal Council’s decision by approving a stepwise phase out of nuclear power: existing NPPs should be decommissioned at the end of their operational lifespan and not be replaced by new NPPs, as originally foreseen. The Federal Council presented its message to Parliament in September 2013 in the new Energy Act. A final vote of Parliament took place in September 2016. A public referendum in May 2017 confirmed the new Energy Act. On 1 January 2018, the new Energy Act entered into force.
The owners and operators of NPPs are responsible for fuel cycle planning and decision making. They make contracts in accordance with national legislation and international agreements. The strategy chosen by the NPP operators included the reprocessing and storage of spent fuel, the latter with a view to later reprocessing or direct disposal. The reprocessing took place abroad (France and United Kingdom). Plutonium and uranium gained from reprocessing was used for fuel fabrication and was reused in Swiss NPPs. The radioactive waste arising from reprocessing has completely been returned to Switzerland. With the new Energy Strategy 2050, spent fuel must be disposed of as radioactive waste and may not reprocessed.
In accordance with the ‘polluter pays principle’, producers of radioactive waste in Switzerland are responsible for ensuring its safe disposal at their own cost. The various ongoing costs (e.g. studies carried out by Nagra, construction of interim storage sites, site selection procedures for deep geological repositories) have to be paid as they arise. Decommissioning costs and expenditures associated with the management (including disposal) of radioactive waste after an NPP has been closed down, are secured through contributions paid into two independent funds by the operator — the decommissioning fund and the waste disposal fund. The Nuclear Energy Act and the Ordinance on the Decommissioning Fund and the Waste Disposal Fund (SR 732.17, 7 December 2007) form the legal basis for these two funds. More information can be found at www.stilllegungsfonds.ch and www.entsorgungsfonds.ch.
2.3.2. Project management
Licensing procedures are divided in three stages: (i) the general licence procedure; (ii) the construction licence procedure; and (iii) the operating licence procedure.
The Federal Council is the executive branch of the Government, consisting of seven members elected by the United Federal Assembly for a four year term. It is responsible for decision making with regard to the application for a general licence. Any decision of the Federal Council will be brought before Parliament. Resolutions by the Federal Assembly concerning the approval of general licences are subject to an optional national referendum.
DETEC is responsible for decision making with regard to applications for construction and operating licences. Its decisions can be appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, and at a later stage to the Federal Supreme Court.
SFOE has the lead on all three authorization procedures. SFOE employs almost 250 staff members. As of the beginning of March 2018, SFOE comprises six divisions and two operational sections.
ENSI is the national regulatory body with responsibility for the nuclear safety and security of Swiss nuclear facilities. In the licensing procedures it is also responsible for safety related examination and assessment of nuclear facilities. Most of ENSI’s expenses are covered by fees, which licence holders have to pay to the Government. ENSI currently employs around 140 staff members, including physicists, mechanical, electrical and civil engineers, geologists, chemists, biologists and psychologists, in addition to technical and administrative personnel.
Other public entities involved in the authorization procedures are the Federal Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC), the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), the Federal Office for Spatial Development (ARE) and the cantons.
2.3.3. Project funding
No Government financial support has been granted for the construction of new NPPs. Some public entities such as the cantons nevertheless have considerable shares of some of the relevant companies.
2.3.4. Electric grid development
The transmission and distribution networks for electricity need to be modernized and expanded. To cope with the increasing fluctuations in electricity production (e.g. wind and photovoltaic), electricity systems must become more flexible. The continuous balance between production and consumption needs to be guaranteed under increasingly dynamic conditions, and grids need to become more automated; smart grids offer one possible solution to these challenges.
Switzerland is closely integrated into the European electricity system. A close integration of markets is of mutual benefit for Switzerland and its neighbouring countries with respect to security of supply. In addition to the Energy Strategy 2050, there is a further national strategy for energy networks in place, including aspects of the international integration, that will be defined to this end. This strategy will also include measures to accelerate the approval process and address aspects concerning the costs of grid expansion and renovation as well as the development of electricity grids towards smart grids.
2.3.5. Site selection
On 9 June 2008, Kernkraftwerk Niederamt AG, a subsidiary of Atel Holding AG (now known as Alpiq Holding AG), submitted an application to the SFOE for a general licence for an NPP with a maximum output of 1600 MW. The plan for the new facility was to be constructed in Niederamt (canton of Solothurn), near the existing Gösgen NPP.
On 4 December 2008, on behalf of Axpo Holding AG and BKW FMB Energie AG, respectively, Ersatz Kernkraftwerk Beznau AG and Ersatz Kernkraftwerk Mühleberg AG each submitted an application to the SFOE for a general licence for the construction of new NPPs to replace the existing Beznau I, Beznau II and Mühleberg facilities. The plan was for these new NPPs, each with a maximum output of 1600 MW, to be constructed at the locations of the existing facilities, namely in Beznau (canton of Aargau) and Mühleberg (canton of Bern).
All three applications have been examined in detail by ENSI. The NSC stated that ENSI delivered an in-depth safety review. The NSC has also made a number of recommendations.
All three applications were suspended in March 2011. In October 2016, the applicants withdrew their applications and on 14 November 2016 DETEC dismissed the general licence procedures.
2.4. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
There are currently no organizations involved in the operation of NPPs.
2.5. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN THE OPERATION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
The following organizations operate an NPP:
KKG AG;
KKL AG;
Axpo AG;
BKW FMB Energie AG.
Major Switzerland based vendors and supporting organizations include:
ABB AG;
Alstom AG;
AF-Colenco AG;
CCI Schweiz AG.
More information can be found at www.nuclearindustry.ch
2.6. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN THE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
No commercial NPPs are under decommissioning.
2.7. FUEL CYCLE, INCLUDING WASTE MANAGEMENT
2.7.1. Fuel supply
Switzerland has no domestic nuclear fuel cycle industry. Enrichment is provided by the United States of America and EU Member States. The fuel elements are manufactured in the United States of America or by EU Member States.
2.7.2. Legal framework
In 2003, Parliament decided to introduce a ten year moratorium on the export of spent fuel for reprocessing, which started in July 2006. Before the start of the moratorium, utilities were free to choose between reprocessing and direct disposal of the spent fuel. The Nuclear Energy Act states a series of conditions which must be fulfilled for an authorization of the export of spent fuel for reprocessing to be granted. The conditions include an agreement with the country of destination, the existence in that country of an adequate facility corresponding to international standards and the fact that the country of destination has ratified the Convention on Nuclear Safety (CNS) and the Joint Convention. The new Energy Strategy 2050 fully forbids reprocessing since 1 January 2018.
The management (handling and storage) of radioactive waste is governed by the provisions of the Nuclear Energy Act and the Nuclear Energy Ordinance, both of which entered into force on 1 February 2005. The management of radioactive waste originating from medicine, industry and research is governed by the Radiological Protection Act and the Radiological Protection Ordinance, both of which entered into force on 1 October 1994. The Radiological Protection Ordinance was fully revised and entered into force on 1 January 2018.
All radioactive waste is to undergo storage in repositories situated in suitable geological formations; near surface disposal is not allowed. Since no repository is yet available, all radioactive waste is stored in interim storage facilities.
2.7.3. Storage facilities
At present, the following spent fuel and radioactive waste management facilities exist in Switzerland:
NPPs: All Swiss NPPs have on-site installations for the conditioning and storage of their own operational waste.
ZZL Central Storage Facility: This facility, operated by ZWILAG, in Würenlingen, comprises an interim storage facility for spent fuel and all kinds of radioactive waste, conditioning installations and a plasma furnace for melting and incineration of low level waste.
Separate storage facility ZWIBEZ at Beznau NPP: It consists of a hall for low level operational waste and a hall for the dry storage of spent fuel.
Wet storage facility at Gösgen NPP: This storage facility is an additional spent fuel pond on the site of the Gösgen NPP. It is intended for independent operation over several years after the future shutdown of the Gösgen NPP.
National Collection Centre and Federal Storage Facility: These installations for radioactive waste from medicine, industry and research are operated by the PSI, in Würenlingen.
2.7.4. Deep geological repositories and site selection process
The responsibility for radioactive waste management lies with the waste producers. Legislation requires that radioactive waste produced in Switzerland be disposed of in Switzerland. The disposal of radioactive waste within the framework of a bilateral or multilateral project is kept as an option, but is not actively pursued.
Two repositories are proposed, one for short lived LILW and one for HLW and spent fuel as well as long lived intermediate level waste mainly from reprocessing. The site selection process has to follow a sectoral plan procedure within the framework of spatial planning legislation. The site selection process, according to the sectoral plan procedure for deep geological repositories, was started with the promulgation of the Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories on 2 April 2008 by the Federal Council. It will last around 15 years and lead to a decision of the Federal Council with regard to the issuance of general licences for the repositories.
Site selection is based primarily on scientific and technical criteria, with the main emphasis on safety, but socioeconomic and environmental aspects must also be addressed. The SFOE is in charge of the site selection procedure, which allows the coordination of a broad range of actors and is divided into three stages.
With regard to the first stage of the site selection process, Nagra submitted its proposals for suitable geological siting areas for the repositories for HLW and LILW to the SFOE on 17 October 2008. ENSI reviewed Nagra’s entire documentation and, in conclusion, approved the six geological siting areas proposed for LILW: Jura Ost (canton of Aargau), Jura-Südfuss (cantons of Solothurn and Aargau), Nördlich Lägern (cantons of Zurich and Aargau), Südranden (canton of Schaffhausen), Wellenberg (cantons of Nidwalden and Obwalden) and Zürich Nordost (cantons of Zurich and Thurgau). All these sites have clay rich sediments as potential host rocks. These include the Opalinus clay, the Brauner Dogger, the Effingen Beds and the marl formations of the Helveticum.
ENSI also approved the three geological siting areas proposed for HLW: Jura Ost, Nördlich Lägern and Zürich Nordost. All the potential HLW sites have Opalinus clay as host rock. ENSI’s review has been commented on by the NSC.
Public consultation was carried out in 2010 by the SFOE, which compiled the comments and submitted a report to the Government. The Government approved all six potential siting regions (see Fig. 2) on 30 November 2011, thus concluding the first stage of the site selection process and initiating the second stage.
FIG 2. Radioactive waste: nuclear installations and potential areas for deep geological repositories.
The goal of the finished Stage 2 by end of 2018 was to reduce the number of siting regions to at least two per waste category for LILW and HLW. In 2015, Nagra proposed the siting areas Zürich Nordost and Jura Ost for further detailed investigations in Stage 3 started in the beginning of 2019. Intensive stakeholder involvement took place through regional conferences, especially with regard to the placement of surface facilities in each siting region. Public consultation on Stage 2 started on 23 November 2017 and lasted until 8 March 2018.
In Stage 3, the remaining sites will be investigated in more detail. The various aspects of the surface facility infrastructure will be discussed in greater detail at the regional conferences. Socioeconomic studies are continuing and monitoring has been implemented. The implementer will submit applications for a general licence (one each for HLW and LILW or one for a combined repository). Parliament’s decision concerning the Government’s approval of the general licence for deep geological repositories is expected around 2030. That decision is subject to an optional national referendum.
After the construction and operation of an in situ rock laboratory, the applications for a construction licence and for an operating licence for each repository will follow; both will be granted by the relevant Federal Department. According to the current schedule, the LILW repository should be operational around 2050 and the HLW repository around 2060.
2.8. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
2.8.1. Research and development organizations and institutes
The PSI is the largest research centre for natural and engineering sciences within Switzerland. Approximately 1150 scientists, including 160 postdoctoral and 200 PhD students (2017 data) at the PSI perform high level research in a large variety of scientific questions that can be grouped into three main fields: matter and material, human health, and energy and the environment. By conducting fundamental and applied research, the PSI works on long term solutions for major challenges facing society, industry and science.
The PSI operates several large scale facilities that allow experiments to be performed that would be impossible in smaller laboratories. The facilities are unique in Switzerland, and some of them are the only ones of their type or scale in the world. The institute provides access to the facilities within the framework of a user service to researchers from universities, other research centres and industrial companies. Each year, about 2300 researchers in these categories perform experiments at the facilities.
2.8.1.1. Energy and the environment
The goal of PSI’s energy research is the development of technologies for a sustainable use of energy. This includes environmentally friendly energy production, the application of renewable energy sources, and low loss energy storage. In addition, technologies are investigated which will contribute to the safe use of nuclear energy. Environmental research is concentrated on the study of processes taking place in the atmosphere. Comprehensive assessment of the economic, ecological and environmental performance of current and future energy supply technologies provides support for decision making.
To cope with the increasing fluctuating energy production (i.e. solar and wind), development of new energy storage methods is critical. In order to test, further develop and optimize different energy storage methods, the PSI operates the Energy System Integration (ESI) Platform. This facility offers research and industry an experimental platform where promising approaches can be tested in all their complex connections and interrelations. New ideas for energy conversion can be tested on a small scale, and their potential for industrial use can be realistically evaluated.
2.8.1.2. Nuclear energy research
About 8% of PSI’s annual government funding of CHF 280 million is dedicated to nuclear energy research (budget 2017 data). PSI’s government funded nuclear energy research activities have been strongly reduced over the past two decades. This reduction was partly compensated by increasing external funding. The current staffing quota per year of about 155 person-years (plus about 25 postdoctoral and 40 PhD students). More than 57% of the overall direct costs of nuclear energy research are externally funded by Swiss NPP operators, Nagra, ENSI, SNF and other national and, in particular, international agencies (including the European Union and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Overview Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations). A large part of this support is for long term research contracts. About 50% of the nuclear energy research at the PSI concentrates on reactor safety and safety related operational aspects of Swiss NPPs and on nuclear waste disposal. Nearly 15% of the resources are dedicated to future reactor concepts and their safety features, which rely on inherent safety mechanisms and on passive system layouts which are investigated (to a limited extent through an active partnership of the PSI in the Generation IV International Forum).
The main objectives of nuclear energy research carried out in the Nuclear Energy and Safety (NES) research division at the PSI are as follows:
To foster nuclear education by substantially contributing to the Swiss Nuclear Master Programme and other programmes (PSI/EPFL/ETHZ);
To contribute to the safe and economic operation of the existing NPPs in Switzerland and to the safe geological storage of radioactive waste by reinforcing the scientific bases of the technologies in the appropriate areas;
To secure standby functionality in key areas, particularly those requiring the services of a Hot Lab;
To provide inputs to stakeholders for decision making purposes;
To look for opportunities to apply NES expertise in sectors other than nuclear, and in its role as an international technical safety organization;
To train young nuclear specialists over a broad spectrum of disciplines, including those with experience of other energy systems.
The NES department is structured into six research laboratories according to their specific scientific and technical areas of competence; an additional department operates the only Hot Lab in the country.
In addition, the PSI academy, which includes the Reactor School and the Radioprotection School offers education and training programmes for present and future reactor operators as well as for radioprotection experts or scientists and technicians working with radioisotopes.
The following sections provides a brief description of the programmes currently carried out within the NES department.
(a) Reactor technology
The STARS programme is a long standing project aimed at the development, maintenance and application of a complex code and database system to be used for investigations into the behaviour of the Swiss nuclear reactors. Focus areas include combined system transient and uncertainty analysis, fuel modelling and neutronics.
The main focus in the Human Reliability Assessment (HRA, risk and human reliability) concerns resolution of current and emerging issues associated with the treatment of human factors in the context of a probabilistic safety assessment. Examples of currently investigated topics include: development of HRA methods, quantification of errors of commission, application of simulator data and a technical basis for seismic HRA.
The Nuclear Fuels programme involves microstructural/micromechanical examination of the ageing of core internals (fuel rods and structural materials), and the development of associated theoretical models. In particular, fuel rod behaviour under service but also under long dry storage conditions are investigated and possible causes of failure are evaluated. Novel methods for production of Generation IV fuels, and their associated fuel cycles, are also under consideration.
The Component Safety programme (INTEGER) involves the experimental characterization of important ageing mechanisms (stress corrosion cracking, thermal fatigue and irradiation embrittlement) in primary pressure boundary components, the development and validation of advanced mechanistic material ageing models and probabilistic methods for improved integrity assessments and lifetime predictions, as well as the evaluation of advanced non-destructive techniques for the early detection of fatigue and stress corrosion crack initiation and for the characterization of the actual degree of embrittlement in components.
The containment phenomenology during postulated severe accidents is further carried out by participation in the project Hydrogen Mitigation Experiments for Reactor Safety (HYMERES) Project Phase 2 (OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA)). Its main objective is to improve basic understanding of the complex thermohydraulic processes and to extend the experimental database to phenomenology not investigated previously. The experiments are carried out at the PSI in the PANDA facility (a large scale, multicompartmental thermal hydraulic facility suited for investigations related to the safety of current and advanced LWRs).
The Source-Term Evaluation programme activities are centred on the AeRosol Trapping in the Steam generator (ARTIST) test facility which reproduces (at reduced scale), aerosol deposition behaviour during a severe accident following a postulated steam generator tube rupture. General considerations of iodine chemistry are being investigated, with specific application to NPPs. The experimental programme is balanced by the development and validation of numerical models, the overall theme being aimed at replacing the existing empirical models by mechanistic modelling using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). All activities are directed towards source term evaluation relevant to the Swiss NPPs.
(b) Waste management
The programme is an ongoing commitment, overseen by the Government, to ensure the safe disposal of radioactive waste from the medical and nuclear industries and also various research facilities. The activities cover fundamental waste disposal chemistry, the physics and chemistry of radionuclides, and investigation of the geological barriers for radionuclide transport. Results will ultimately find use in the comprehensive application of safety criteria. This R&D programme is carried out in close cooperation with Nagra.
(c) Energy systems analysis
These activities are carried out within the Laboratory for Energy System Analysis (LEA) which is an interdisciplinary laboratory supporting both the NES and the Energy and Environment Division (ENE). The laboratory aims to contribute to effective decision making on long term technology strategies in energy supply and demand by ensuring the full integration of major environmental, economic and social factors. The LEA also develops methodologies, and carries out the associated risk analyses, with a focus on HRA.
The Technology Assessment programme involves comprehensive analyses of environmental, economic and risk performance of fossil, nuclear and renewable energy technologies as well as of a wide spectrum of mobility options. It is based on an interdisciplinary framework, thus enabling consistent comparisons to be made between current and future options for the electricity, heating and transport sectors.
In the Energy Economics programme, energy system models are developed and quantitative analyses are carried out on the Swiss, European and global levels to improve the understanding of the interactions among energy, economics, the environment and technology. The generated long term scenarios of energy systems enable examination of the associated energy-technology strategies and the impact of related policy instruments
(d) Hot Laboratory
The Hot Laboratory (Hot Lab) is the largest nuclear research facility in Switzerland, under the supervision of ENSI, and the only Swiss research facility capable of examining large quantities of radioactive material. The two main tasks of the Hot Laboratory Division (AHL), the operating organization unit, are to ensure the safe and efficient operation of the Hot Lab infrastructure and to conduct state of the art service work for the Swiss nuclear industry. Accordingly, AHL offers Hot Lab users (i.e. research groups from other units) modern analytical tools for the manipulation and investigation of radioactive material. In particular, the laboratory is well equipped for structural and chemical analyses of the materials used in NPPs and accelerator facilities.
2.8.2. Development of advanced nuclear technologies
2.8.2.1. Research on future reactors (Generation III and IV) at the Paul Scherrer Institute
The ALPHA programme provides confirmation of the characteristics of passive safety systems for advanced LWRs, and is centred on the large scale, integral test facility PANDA. More recently, the experimental base was broadened to incorporate investigations of fundamental phenomena in both the primary circuit and containment, and include the study of two phase flow phenomena (such as bubbly flows), the prediction of critical heat flux, and mixture/stratification phenomena. A number of additional small and medium scale, single effect test facilities are now also included under the project heading. At all three scales, experimentation is accompanied by the development and application of novel instrumentation techniques able to measure the distributed parameters characteristic of 3-D flow fields. In parallel, there is an ongoing development and validation programme for the accompanying numerical tools, particularly CFD, but also including multiscale modelling approaches to basic phenomena, such as boiling.
In the appropriately named FAST programme (fast spectrum core and safety analysis with emphasis on generic developments and Generation IV systems), activities are aimed at the development and implementation of a code system representing state of the art safety analyses of nuclear systems incorporating fast neutron spectra.
The High-Temperature Materials programme activities involve characterization of materials to be used in future Generation IV reactors (particularly gas cooled reactors), which will operate at significantly higher temperatures, and are subject to a more intense radiation environment than current Generation II reactors. Mechanistic models are being developed for the prediction of material behaviour, from the atomic level up to the scale of the continuum. Experimental validation of the models is also undertaken using advanced spectroscopic methods and, in particular, synchrotron radiation.
Switzerland has participated in international projects in the field of plasma physics and controlled nuclear fusion for the past 25 years, primarily in a European context. In participating in the research programmes of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), Swiss research on fusion has focused on its primary skills and is seen as an important partner at the European level. Switzerland participates indirectly in the international organization International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER, which also means a path or journey in Latin), which has been tasked with conducting a decisive experiment for determining the viability of nuclear fusion as a clean and safe source of energy. Switzerland is a member of Fusion for Energy, the common European company established to provide Europe’s contribution to the ITER project.
2.8.2.2. Radiochemistry
The Laboratory of Radiochemistry (LRC) focuses on fundamental research and on education in the field of radiochemistry. The topics studied within LRC cover a wide and diverse range of radiochemical research, including studies on the chemistry of heavy elements, harvesting exotic radionuclides from irradiated accelerator components for use in fundamental research, developing innovative radiopharmaceuticals and the chemical behaviour of radionuclides in liquid metals proposed as target material or coolant in future nuclear facilities.
2.8.2.3. Scientific computing and modelling
A new laboratory concentrating different groups that are active in the modelling of complex, multiscale processes was created in the NES division. The main goal of this laboratory is to offer a centre of competence for the development of high end tools for numerical simulations and visualization of complex physical phenomena using the High Performance Computers available in Switzerland. In particular, the further development of computational fluid dynamics and the simulation of advanced nuclear systems will ideally be realized in this lab.
2.8.3. Research programme of the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate
ENSI operates its Regulatory Safety Research programme in order to support its supervisory activities. The programme covers reactor safety, radiation protection and waste disposal. It comprises around 40 projects and a budget of about CHF 6 million per year. The projects are conducted by Swiss Partners (mainly the PSI, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) and universities), by international organizations and research institutions abroad, and, to a smaller degree, by ENSI itself.
Projects in the ENSI Research Programme contribute towards clarifying outstanding issues, establishing fundamentals and developing the tools that ENSI requires to discharge its responsibilities. The projects also foster the skills needed for regulatory activities and help develop independent expertise. Finally, international projects deliver results that Switzerland could not achieve on its own and at the same time encourage cross-border networking. These are the main objectives of ENSI’s research strategy.
The Regulatory Safety Research programme is divided into seven subject areas:
The fuels and materials area covers the reactor core and the multiple successive barriers used for the containment of radioactive material. Research into fuels is particularly concerned with high burnup rates and safety criteria for accidents.
Projects conducted under the auspices of the OECD/NEA and relating to internal events and damage encourage the international exchange of information on incidents, accidents and component damage that can trigger accidents or affect them adversely. Subject specific databases (e.g. on incidents involving fires or damage to passive metal components) are created for this purpose. These databases facilitate the collation and systematic analysis of operating experience from many countries.
ENSI supports research projects addressing external events such as earthquakes, flooding, aircraft crashes and explosions.
The impact of operator actions on incidents and accidents in NPPs is the most important human factor under consideration. Identifying and assessing operating errors that adversely affect the course of an accident are key aspects of reducing uncertainty in probabilistic safety analyses. The design of interfaces between humans and technical systems is also of paramount importance.
System behaviour and accident sequences in NPPs are analysed in various conditions ranging from normal operation to accidents involving core meltdown. This entails creating computer models and validating them by carrying out experiments. These are also used as a basis for quantitative identification of plant risk in probabilistic safety analyses.
PSI’s applications based research activities in the field of radiological protection range from radiation measurement techniques, through aerial radiometrics (measuring airborne radioactivity), to developing new radionuclide analysis methods. In addition, involvement in the development of international standards contributes to cross-border harmonization of radiological protection methods. It is particularly important that expertise is maintained in this field.
The field of waste management covers not only deep geological disposal, but also preceding processes such as transport and interim storage of radioactive waste.
2.8.4. International cooperation and initiatives
Euratom was established in 1957 by the Treaty of Rome. In 1978, Switzerland and Euratom signed a cooperation agreement in the field of controlled thermonuclear fusion and plasma physics. Based on this agreement, Switzerland participates in the European effort to develop sustained fusion power. This effort includes participation in the operation of the Joint European Torus JET, the ITER project and other international activities relating to plasma and material research.
Since 2004, Switzerland has been fully associated with the sixth and seventh framework programmes of Euratom. This has enabled Switzerland to extend its cooperation with Euratom to the fields of general research in the fission domain and the nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre (JRC).
ENSI supports research into nuclear safety and is represented on more than 70 international commissions and specialist groups working in the field of nuclear safety. It thereby makes an active contribution to new international safety guidelines. Through its network of contacts, ENSI is in touch with current developments in science and technology and discharges its regulatory remit on the basis of global experience in nuclear energy. Since 2011, ENSI has chaired the Western European Nuclear Regulators Association (WENRA). In 2013, ENSI submitted a proposal to amend the CNS to the IAEA, in Vienna. The proposal aimed to make the backfitting of existing nuclear installations a legally binding obligation within the CNS. The endeavour proved successful and the Vienna Declaration on Nuclear Safety (VDNS) was adopted at a CNS diplomatic conference in 2015. With this declaration, CNS Contracting Parties are committed to implementing the principles enshrined in the VDNS and regularly reporting on their implementation at CNS review meetings.
In the field of radioactive waste management, international research programmes are carried out in the Mont Terri rock laboratory (near St. Ursane in the canton of Jura; investigation of the Opalinus clay; an indurated claystone of lower Jurassic age; operator: Federal Office of Topography (swisstopo)) and the Grimsel Test Site (canton of Bern; investigation of crystalline rocks; operator: Nagra).
The Mont Terri rock laboratory provides a platform for international collaboration and the exchange of know-how among researchers, technicians, engineers and scientists. swisstopo operates the rock laboratory and runs the Mont Terri Project. Today, 16 organizations from Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Spain, Switzerland and the United States of America are involved in the underground research project. Other countries are also considering argillaceous rocks like Opalinus clay as possible host rocks for deep geological disposal. From 1996 to 2017, the allocated investments in the Mont Terri rock laboratory amounted to CHF 84.3 million. Swiss partners Nagra, ENSI and swisstopo contributed 45% and the other partners 55%.
The Mont Terri rock laboratory serves research purposes only. There is no question of disposing of radioactive waste there, on the one hand, for geological reasons (folded Jura Mountains, where the Opalinus clay is tectonized) and, on the other hand, because the disposal of any such waste is excluded by the contractual agreement with the canton of Jura.
The Grimsel Test Site (GTS) was established in 1984 as a centre for underground R&D supporting a wide range of research projects on the disposal of radioactive waste. It is located at an altitude of 1730 m above sea level in the granitic formations of the Aar Massif. Twenty-one partner organizations from 12 countries (from Europe, Asia and North America) and the European Union, as well as universities, research institutes and consulting companies from various countries, are involved in the projects at the test site (2018 data).
Similar to Mont Terri, GTS is a research facility and not a potential repository site; although investigations may utilize a wide range of radioactive tracers, no radioactive waste will be disposed of at GTS. Therefore, a unique characteristic of GTS among existing rock laboratories worldwide is the existence of a radiation controlled zone (IAEA Level B/C) in one of the investigation tunnels, which allows experiments to be carried out with radioactive tracers in the geosphere under realistic conditions. GTS, as an open underground research facility, also offers its services and infrastructure to non-radioactive waste related research activities such as geothermal or fundamental geoscientific and engineering disciplines.
In June 2019, the L’Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) became an IAEA collaborating centre in the fields of open source data and code development for nuclear applications. The EPFL Collaborating Centre’s objective will be to step beyond traditional development strategies, which are based on relatively old and often proprietary software and data. At the core of the Centre’s activities will be the promotion of R&D work fostering the concepts of open source and shared development. This will boost R&D activities and contribute to a safe operation of nuclear plants by increasing synergies, limiting inefficiencies, promoting networking and contributing to standardization.
2.9. HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
A Master of Science in Nuclear Engineering is offered jointly by EPF Lausanne and ETH Zürich, two leading science and engineering universities in Europe, in order to qualify multidisciplinary professionals for industry, research and national authorities. The PSI supports the programme by offering its research infrastructure for scientific projects by the students and by assisting in lecturing (for further information on human resources development at the PSI refer to Section 2.8). The programme was launched in 2008 and lasts four semesters, which is compatible with European requirements. The number of graduates has dropped from a maximum of 15 to currently 8 per year. Areas covered include the safe and reliable operation of existing and new reactors, the development of novel reactor types, the sustainable supply of nuclear fuel, the closure of the fuel cycle, the disposal of radioactive waste, the decommissioning of NPPs and many others. The curriculum provides in-depth knowledge of reactor physics, thermohydraulics and nuclear material. It has been gradually extended by including courses and project opportunities related to non-energetic applications of nuclear techniques, such as medical diagnosis and therapy. Currently, the Master programme in nuclear engineering is still secured for enrolment in autumn 2018. Its future beyond this enrolment date depends on the replacement of the professorship of Nuclear Energy Systems at ETH Zürich after the retirement of the current professor in 2020. As of January 2018, it is no longer possible to enrol new PhD students at ETH Zürich in the field of reactor thermohydraulics, an important area of reactor safety.
The small research reactor of the Institute of Physics of the University of Basel was shut down in 2013 and defuelled in 2015, with decommissioning scheduled to take place by 2020. The University of Basel was the only institution in Switzerland with an infrastructure for neutron activation analysis. The remaining small research reactor CROCUS at EPF Lausanne has become central for training nuclear engineers and competence preservation. A small plasma fusion neutron source for tomographic imaging that has been developed cooperatively by ETH Zürich and the PSI is used for educational purposes, as well.
The Nuclear Forum Switzerland published an overview of Switzerland’s human resources development in the field of nuclear energy (2013 data). It concluded that there are generally still enough nuclear specialists trained for current Swiss requirements, given that Switzerland can partially rely on an inflow of human capital from abroad.
2.10. STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATION
Under the Nuclear Energy Act (art. 74), ENSI “shall regularly inform the general public about the condition of nuclear installations and any matters pertaining to nuclear goods and radioactive waste” and “shall inform the general public of any special occurrences”. In addition, ENSI is required to respond to questions from Parliament on nuclear safety and the work of the regulatory body. As a federal authority, ENSI is subject to the Federal Act on Freedom of Information in the Administration. According to which, all ENSI documents are public, with a few exceptions, such as security related information, personal data or trade secrets.
The information services of the ENSI go well beyond these legal requirements. It regularly provides direct information to the public. Its web site (www.ensi.ch) is an important information tool covering all aspects of nuclear safety in Switzerland in German and French as well as some topics in Italian and English. It is accompanied by activities on social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook and YouTube). ENSI is committed to objectivity and avoids any speculation or placation.
In addition to the annual reports, including the Regulatory Oversight Report, Research and Experience Report, Radiation Protection Report and Business Report, it publishes reports on current topics (e.g. earthquakes and disposal of radioactive waste). ENSI also publishes all the review reports generated by review meetings of conventions, review missions or topical peer reviews.
Other communication activities include responses to questions from non-governmental organizations and individuals as well as participation in public hearings, symposia and panel discussions on nuclear safety. ENSI regularly organizes meetings with stakeholders, irrespective of their nuclear stance. Media activities include press conferences and press releases as well as interviews on issues of nuclear safety that are the subject of current media discussion.
In 2009, in connection with the search for sites for deep geological repositories, the SFOE, the competent authority leading the process, set up the Technical Forum on Safety, which is led by ENSI. The Technical Forum on Safety discusses and answers technical and scientific questions asked by the public, communities, siting regions, organizations, cantons and authorities in neighbouring states. The forum comprises experts from the SFOE, ENSI, swisstopo, the NSC, Nagra, the cantons, neighbouring countries Austria and Germany, the Swiss Energy Foundation (SES) and up to two representatives from each of the proposed siting regions of the site selection process. In 2013, ENSI set up a similar forum for questions concerning NPPs.
Governmental communication is focusing on radioactive waste disposal; efforts to keep the public, stakeholders and neighbouring countries informed has been intensified in the context of the ongoing site selection procedure for deep geological repositories. Governmental communication in this field is committed to ensuring a high level of transparency and public participation.
3. NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
3.1. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
3.1.1. Regulatory authorities
3.1.1.1. Licensing
The Federal Council is the authority that grants general licences. DETEC grants construction licences and operating licences for nuclear facilities. SFOE is responsible for coordinating the licensing procedures and issuing licences for the handling of nuclear material and radioactive waste.
3.1.1.2. Supervision
ENSI is the national regulatory authority in Switzerland with responsibility for nuclear energy. It is supervised by an independent board, which is elected by the Federal Council and reports directly to it.
ENSI is responsible for the supervision of Swiss nuclear facilities (i.e. the NPPs, the interim storage facility for radioactive waste, the nuclear research facilities at the PSI, in Villigen, the EPF Lausanne and the University of Basel). Its regulatory remit covers the entire life of a facility (i.e. from initial planning through operation to final decommissioning, including the disposal of radioactive waste). It also includes the safety of staff and the public and their protection from radiation, sabotage and terrorism. In addition, ENSI is involved in the transport of radioactive material to and from nuclear facilities and in the continuing geoscientific investigations to identify a suitable location for the deep geological disposal of radioactive waste.
ENSI monitors the operation of nuclear facilities:
ENSI reviews reporting by the operators, holds regular supervisory discussions and monitors the nuclear facilities (including their organization and operation) by means of more than 400 on-site inspections each year.
Each summer, every NPP carries out an inspection, lasting several weeks, during which maintenance work and repairs are undertaken in the plant.
In order to protect staff, the population and the environment, ENSI monitors compliance with the radiation protection regulations and dose limits.
ENSI collates all the data obtained during the year into one comprehensive safety assessment, from which it derives any measures that may be required as well as its future supervision plans.
ENSI assesses nuclear facilities:
The assessment and monitoring of nuclear facilities are based on laws, guidelines and underlying technical and scientific documentation, which transparently set out the safety requirements and criteria that ENSI applies for its assessments. ENSI continues to develop the underlying documentation and guidelines in accordance with the latest status of science and technology.
ENSI draws up safety assessments when operators of nuclear facilities submit applications which go beyond the scope of their existing operation.
Applications for modifications to nuclear facilities that are covered by existing operating licences are dealt with by ENSI, which issues a permit if the decision is positive.
3.1.1.3. Advisory committee
The NSC is designated as an advisory committee to the Federal Council and DETEC. It is involved in the licensing process as it reviews and comments on the safety evaluation reports prepared by the supervisory authorities.
3.1.1.4. Others
In the nuclear field, the supervisory authority with respect to nuclear safety and radiation protection is ENSI. In the non-nuclear field, the supervisory authorities are the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) and the public sector insurer SUVA (formerly Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund). The FOPH manages the licensing procedures in the non-nuclear field according to the radiological protection legislation. It is responsible for waste produced from the health care sector, industry and research.
The National Emergency Operations Centre (part of the Federal Office of Civil Protection in the Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport) oversees all emergency situations, including those arising from events at NPPs and relating to the protection of the public and the environment.
Several advisory committees to the Government or governmental departments covering aspects of radiological protection, emergency planning and waste disposal have responsibilities associated with the operation of NPPs. However, they are not involved in the licensing process and have no authority over the plants.
3.2. MAIN NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN NUCLEAR POWER
Nuclear Energy Act of 21 March 2003 (SR 732.1);
Nuclear Energy Ordinance of 10 December 2004 (SR 732.11);
Ordinance of 7 December 2007 on the Decommissioning Fund and the Waste Disposal Fund for Nuclear Installations (SR 732.17);
Radiological Protection Act of 22 March 1991 (SR 814.50);
Radiological Protection Ordinance of 26 April 2017 (SR 814.501);
Federal Nuclear Energy Liability Act of 18 March 1983 (SR 732.44);
Federal Nuclear Energy Liability Ordinance of 5 December 1983 (SR 732.441);
Ordinance of 12 November 2008 on the Federal Nuclear Safety Commission (SR 732.16);
Federal Act of 22 June 2007 on the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (SR 732.2);
Ordinance of 12 November 2008 on the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (SR 732.21);
Safeguards Ordinance of 21 March 2012 (SR 732.12);
Ordinance of 20 October 2010 on Emergency Organization in Case of ABC or Natural Events (SR 520.17);
Ordinance of 20 October 2010 on Emergency Protection Measures in the Vicinity of Nuclear Installations (SR 732.33);
Ordinance of 17 October 2007 on the National Emergency Operations Centre (SR 520.18);
Ordinance of 23 August 1978 on Additional Agreements to the Non-Proliferation Treaty Safeguards Agreement (SR 732.91);
Federal Act of 13 December 1996 on the Control of Dual-Use Goods and of Specific Military Goods (SR 946.202);
Ordinance of 25 June 1997 on the Export, Import and Transit of Dual Use Goods and Specific Military Goods (SR 946.202.1);
Ordinance of 18 August 2010 on Issuing Warnings and Alerting (SR 520.12).
Appendix I
INTERNATIONAL, MULTILATERAL AND BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
I.1. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency dated 26 October 1956;
Agreement dated 1 July 1959 on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Atomic Energy Agency;
Agreement dated 28 February 1972 between the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Government of Switzerland and the Government of the United States of America for the Application of Safeguards;
Statute of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency dated 20 December 1957;
Protocol dated 20 December 1957 on the Tribunal established by the Convention on the Establishment of a Security Control in the Field of Nuclear Energy;
Rules of Procedure of the European Nuclear Energy Tribunal dated 11 December 1962;
Convention dated 20 December 1957 on the Establishment of a Security Control in the Field of Nuclear Energy.
I.2. SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL AND NUCLEAR SAFETY
Convention dated 17 June 1994 on Nuclear Safety;
Joint Convention dated 5 September 1997 on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management.
I.3. PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL
Convention dated 26 October 1979 on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and its Amendment dated 8 July 2005.
I.4. TERRORISM SUPPRESSION
International Convention dated 13 April 2005 for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism;
European Convention dated 27 January 1977 on the Suppression of Terrorism.
I.5. RADIATION PROTECTION
Convention dated 22 June 1960 Concerning the Protection of Workers against Ionizing Radiation.
I.6. INFORMATION EXCHANGE AND ASSISTANCE IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY
Agreement dated 30 November 1989 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of France on Information Exchange in Case of Incidents or Accidents with Possible Radiological Consequences;
Agreement dated 10 August 1982 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Germany on Mutual Information in Case of Construction and Operation of Nuclear Facilities near the Border;
Agreement dated 15 December 1989 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Italy on Quick Information Exchange in Case of Nuclear Accidents;
Convention dated 26 September 1986 on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident;
Convention dated 26 September 1986 on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency;
Convention dated 31 May 1978 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Germany on Radioprotection in Case of an Alert;
Exchange of notes dated 25 July 1986 between Switzerland and Germany concerning the application of the Convention dated 31 May 1978/15 February 1980/25 July 1986 on Radioprotection in Case of an Alert;
Agreement dated 19 March 1999 between the Swiss Government and the Austrian Republic on Quick Information Exchange in the Field of Nuclear Security and Radioprotection;
Exchange of letters dated 5/20 November 2008 between the Swiss Federal Council and the Government of France concerning the field and the modalities of alert and/or of transmission of information in case of a minor event or an accidental situation in the NPP of Fessenheim or in the Swiss NPPs of Beznau, Gösgen, Leibstadt and Mühleberg (with annex);
Agreement dated 10 August 1982 for the reciprocal provision of information concerning the construction and operation of nuclear installations in frontier areas (with annex).
I.7. NUCLEAR LIABILITY
Agreement dated 22 October 1986 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Germany in the field of nuclear liability.
I.8. NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Convention dated 1 July 1953 for the Establishment of a European Organization for Nuclear Research;
Financial Protocol dated 1 July 1953 Annexed to the Convention for the Establishment of a European Organization for Nuclear Research;
Juridical Statute of the European Organization for Nuclear Research on Swiss Territory;
Agreements with France concerning the extension in French territory of the domain of the European Organization for Nuclear Research;
Agreement dated 28 November 2007 in the form of an exchange of letters between the Swiss Government and the European Atomic Energy Community on the Application of the Agreement on the International Organization ITER;
Agreement dated 28 November 2007 in the form of an exchange of letters between the Swiss Government and the European Atomic Energy Community on the Adhesion of Switzerland to the Common European Venture for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy;
Agreement dated 5 December 2014 for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and European Atomic Energy Community and the Swiss Confederation associating the Swiss Confederation to Horizon 2020 — the Framework of Programme for Research and Innovation and the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Communication complementing Horizon 2020, and regulating the Swiss Confederation’s participation in the ITER activities carried out by Fusion for Energy;
Exchange of letters dated 6 November 1986 between the Swiss Government and the European Atomic Energy Community concerning the Swiss Association to the Cooperation Agreement between Euratom and the United States of America.
I.9. NON-PROLIFERATION AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Treaty dated 5 August 1963 Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water;
Treaty dated 1 July 1968 on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;
Agreement dated 6 September 1978 between the Swiss Government and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;
Protocol additional to the agreement dated 6 September 1978 between the Swiss Confederation and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;
Treaty dated 11 February 1971 on the Prohibition of the Emplacement of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction on the Seabed and the Ocean Floor and in the Subsoil Thereof.
I.10. BILATERAL AGREEMENTS CONCERNING PEACEFUL USES OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Cooperation Agreement dated 28 January 1986 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Australia Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy;
Cooperation Agreement dated 22 December 1987 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Canada Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy;
Cooperation Agreement dated 12 November 1986 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of China Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy;
Cooperation Agreement dated 5 December 1988 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of France Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy;
Cooperation Agreement dated 14 February 1968 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Sweden Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy;
Exchange of letters dated 30 November 1989 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of France for the Creation of a Mixed Commission on Nuclear Safety;
Cooperation Agreement dated 31 October 1997 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of the United States of America Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy;
Cooperation Agreement dated 6 April 1990 between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of the Russian Federation Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy;
Additional Protocol dated 25 April 1990 to the Cooperation Agreement between the Government of Switzerland and the Government of Sweden Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.
APPENDIX 2. MAIN ORGANIZATIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND COMPANIES INVOLVED IN NUCLEAR POWER RELATED ACTIVITIES
National nuclear energy authorities |
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC) Bundeshaus Nord Kochergasse 10 CH-3003 Bern tel.: +41 31 322 21 11 fax: +41 31 322 26 92 info@gs-uvek.admin.ch www.uvek.admin.ch |
Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) Mühlestrasse 4 CH-3003 Bern tel.: +41 31 322 56 11 fax: +41 31 323 25 00 contact@bfe.admin.ch www.bfe.admin.ch |
Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI) Industriestrasse 19 CH-5200 Brugg tel.: +41 56 460 84 00 fax: +41 56 460 84 99 info@ensich www.ensi.ch |
Federal Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC) Gaswerkstrasse 5 CH-5200 Brugg tel.: +41 56 462 86 86 www.bfe.admin.ch/kns |
Main power utilities |
Kernkraftwerk Gösgen-Däniken AG Postfach CH-4658 Däniken tel.: +41 62 288 20 00 fax: +41 62 288 20 01 www.kkg.ch |
Kernkraftwerk Leibstadt AG CH-5325 Leibstadt tel.: +41 56 267 71 11 www.kkl.ch |
Alpiq AG Bahnhofquai 12 4601 Olten tel.: +41 62 286 71 11 fax: +41 62 286 73 73 info@alpiq.com www.alpiq.com |
Axpo Holding AG Corporate Communications Zollstrasse 62 CH-8023 Zurich tel.: + 41 44 278 41 11 fax: + 41 44 278 41 12 info@axpo.ch www.axpo.ch |
BKW FMB Energie AG Marketingkommunikation Viktoriaplatz 2 CH-3000 Bern 25 tel.: +41 31 330 51 11 fax: +41 31 330 56 35 info@bkw-fmb.ch www.bkw.ch |
Radioactive waste management |
National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra) Hardstrasse 73 CH-5430 Wettingen tel.: +41 56 437 11 11 info@nagra.ch www.nagra.ch |
ZWILAG Zwischenlager Würenlingen AG Industriestrasse Beznau 1 CH-5303 Würenlingen tel.: +41 56 297 47 11 fax: +41 56 297 47 22 info@zwilag.ch www.zwilag.ch |
Grimsel Test Site Nagra Hardstrasse 73 CH-5430 Wettingen tel.: +41 564 371 310 fax: +41 564 371 317 doa@nagra.ch www.grimsel.com |
Mont Terri Rock Laboratory Project Federal Office of Topography (swisstopo) Route de la Gare 64 CH-2882 St. Ursanne tel.: +41 79 414 04 59 info@swisstopo.ch www.mont-terri.ch |
Nuclear research |
Paul Scherrer Institute CH-5232 Villigen tel.: +41 56 310 21 11 fax: +41 56 310 21 99 info@psi.ch www.psi.ch |
Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas CRPP EPFL SB CRPP Station 13 CH-1015 Lausanne tel.: +41 21 693 5474 fax: +41 21 693 5176 crpp.epfl.ch |
Laboratory for Reactor Physics and Systems Behaviour EPFL SB IPEP LRS Station 3 CH-1015 Lausanne tel.: +41 21 693 33 75 fax: +41 21 693 44 70 lrs.epfl.ch |
Laboratory for Nuclear Energy Systems ETH Zürich ML K 13 Sonneggstrasse 3 CH-8092 Zurich tel.: +41 44 632 60 25 fax: +41 44 632 16 57 hprasser@ethz.ch www.lke.mavt.ethz.ch |
(1) See www.bfe.admin.ch/bfe/en/home/policy/energy-strategy-2050.html
(2) Corporations with an annual electricity consumption of more than 100 000 kW·h.