Sweden’s energy policy aims to promote security of supply, competitiveness and ecological sustainability.

Security of supply is dependent on the energy system’s capacity, flexibility and resilience and it relates to the diversification and the robustness of the country’s energy infrastructure. Security of supply is primarily pursued through efficient energy markets and the development of policies to avoid energy shortages and mitigate their potential impact. For the electricity system, this implies that the available production capacity must be able to meet the end users’ demand, as an unbalance between the country’s production and consumption would negatively affect supply security.

Competitiveness in the energy sector promotes an efficient use of resources and creates low energy prices, which is an important factor in ensuring the competitiveness of the Swedish industry.

A reduced climate impact is one of the goals of the country’s climate policy. In 2017, the Parliament decided on a net zero emission target for 2045, to be achieved through a reduction of greenhouse gases emissions by 63% in 2030 and by 75% in 2040 compared with 1990 emission levels. Furthermore, the Parliament decided that emissions from the transportation sector in 2030 should be 70% lower than in 2010.

Since the energy sector represents a sizeable contribution to the country’s total emission of greenhouse gases, the country’s emission targets translate into goals related to energy efficiency and to enhance the total share of energy production by renewable sources.

After the multiparty Energy Commission announced an overall agreement on Sweden’s energy policy in June 2016 and published its final report on 9 January 2017, the Parliament approved the following goals for Sweden’s energy policy:

• 50% more efficient energy consumption should be in place by 2030 compared with 2005.

• 100% of electricity production should be derived from renewable sources by 2040. This number is intended as a target; it is not to be interpreted as a deadline for banning nuclear power, nor does it imply the closing of NPPs through political decisions.

In addition to nuclear power, Sweden’s energy requirements are covered by domestic production, in the form of hydropower, wind power, wood fuels (including residues from the forestry industry), and municipal waste, as well as by imported energy, primarily oil, nuclear fuel and natural gas.

Nuclear power plays an important role in Sweden’s energy system, although Sweden already obtains a large proportion of its energy supplies from renewable energy sources in the form of solid and liquid fuels from biomass, hydropower and wind power. In 2019, 56% of the total energy used came from renewable energy sources and the share of electricity production from renewable sources was 59%.

Table 1 shows Sweden’s estimated available energy by source. The main domestic energy sources are hydropower, wind power and bioenergy.

Hydropower is already well developed in Sweden. The remaining unexploited resources are protected under Swedish law from further expansion of hydropower and therefore they cannot be interpreted as potential sources of renewable energy.

Sweden possesses large amounts of low grade uranium. However, the uranium content in the ore is low or very low and there has not been an economic incentive to exploit it. Furthermore, uranium mining has been forbidden under Swedish law since 1 August 2018. All nuclear fuel is therefore imported.

TABLE 1. ESTIMATED AVAILABLE ENERGY SOURCES

*Solid, Liquid: Million tonnes; Gas: Billion m³; Uranium: Metric tonnes; Hydro, Renewable: TW.

—: data not available.

¹⁾ Reasonably assured resources.

²⁾ Data refers to the exploited resources.

Source: Uranium Resources, Production and Demand, 2018, Swedish Energy Agency.

Table 2 shows information on energy consumption in Sweden.

TABLE 2. ENERGY CONSUMPTION

*Latest available data, please note that compound annual growth rate may not be representative of actual average growth.

**Total energy derived from primary and secondary generation sources. Figures do not reflect potential heat output that may result from electricity co-generation.

Source(s): United Nations Statistical Division, OECD/IEA and IAEA RDS-1

Sweden’s electricity market was deregulated in 1996, granting consumers the possibility to choose their supplier of electric energy. The distribution network is set up as a regulated monopoly, but with a number of different owners. The main marketplace for the trading of electricity is the Nordic power market Nord Pool, which serves as a spot market for trading electricity per hour for delivery the next day. Most of the trade per hour takes place through Nord Pool, while a smaller portion is made directly between electricity producers and electricity trading companies. Nord Pool also has a market for intraday trading, allowing traders and producers to more easily establish short term balance between production and consumption.

The responsibility to maintain the balance between production and consumption of electricity lies with the system operator for electricity, the State authority Svenska Kraftnät, also owner of the national high voltage transmission grid.

Svenska Kraftnät is in the process of expanding and strengthening the national transmission grid in order to accommodate increasing demand for electricity and increasing decentralized production. Ageing infrastructure and increase in demand from new sectors such as data centres and electrification of transport and industry also drive large investments in the transmission grid. A list of ongoing projects can be found on Svenska Kraftnät’s website.

Any expansion of the transmission grid, including most of the regional distribution grids, requires a network concession from the Swedish Energy Market Inspectorate, the authority regulating electricity network operations in Sweden. The process aims to find the best route for new transmission lines but also to show why a new line is needed. This process requires environmental impact assessments and other studies, but also stakeholder involvement in the form of early discussions with local authorities such as the affected County Administrative Boards and municipal authorities, as well as meetings with local citizens.

Large electricity producers and regional grids can connect to the national high voltage transmission grid by applying to Svenska Kraftnät. Svenska Kraftnät determines if the connection is technically possible and whether it requires strengthening the transmission grid; in these cases, Svenska Kraftnät charges the applicant a connection fee. However, capacity increases or other needed modifications of the transmission grid that are not directly caused by a single party, such as increases in transfer capacity between different parts of the country, are covered by Svenska Kraftnät’s normal fees and tariffs.

Sweden is a net exporter of electricity. In 2019, total electricity production in Sweden amounted to 165.6 TWh while the consumption was 139.5 TWh. Most of the electricity produced comes from hydropower and NPPs. In 2019, the share of nuclear power and hydropower was approximately the same and they together represented 78% of the total production. The remaining share predominantly comes from biomass based conventional thermal power and wind power. The share of electricity produced by wind power is increasing. In 2019, it represented 12% of the total electricity production. The total number of operating wind turbines in 2019 was 3 976 for a total installed capacity of 8.7 GW(e).

On the consumption side, the manufacturing and mining sector represented a share of 34% of the total consumption in 2019, while services and households represented 30% and 25% of the total consumption, respectively.

Utilities in the electric power sector are power plant and transmission grid owners, and are active on the retail electricity market as well. The companies carrying out production and transmission operations are separate and independent legal entities.

The biggest electricity producers in Sweden are the three utilities Vattenfall, Uniper and Fortum. Together, these utilities oversee a share of around 70% of the total production. Other sizeable electricity producers are Statkraft and Skellefteĺ Kraft, controlling around 10% of the total production.

There is a geographical imbalance in electricity production and consumption in the country, whereby some regions are net electricity exporters while others are net importers. In 2016 the northern part of Sweden, for example, by virtue of its hydroelectric power plants accounted for 38% of production and only 18% of consumption, whereas the Stockholm region accounted for only 1% of production but 16% of consumption.

Electricity is transmitted from the producers to the consumers by the national high voltage transmission grid, regional grids and local grids. Sweden’s electricity network consists of 56 000 km of power lines, of which approximately 68% are underground cables, predominantly in the local grids.

There are around 170 grid operators in Sweden. The national high voltage transmission grid (400 kV/220 kV) is owned by Svenska Kraftnät and consists of 15 500 km of power lines, about 160 substations and switching stations and 16 connections to other countries. The regional grids (voltage between 130 kV and 40 kV) transmit electricity from the national grid to large electricity consumers and to local grids. The local grids serve the remaining end consumers. Most of the regional grids are owned by three grid operators: Vattenfall Eldistribution, E.ON Energidistribution and Ellevio.

Table 3 shows information on electricity production in Sweden, and Table 4 shows energy related ratios for the country. The amount of electricity produced by wind power depends on weather conditions. Nuclear power is used for baseload production while hydropower is used for load following.

TABLE 3. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION

*Latest available data, please note that compound annual growth rate may not be representative of actual average growth.

**Electricity transmission losses are not deducted.

Source:United Nations Statistical Division, OECD/IEA and IAEA RDS-1 

TABLE 4. ENERGY RELATED RATIOS

*Latest available data.

Source: RDS-1 and RDS-2

—: data not available.

A national nuclear programme was started in 1947 and its implementation was led by AB Atomenergi, a joint venture between the Swedish State and the private sector.

The first research reactor, R1, located at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm, achieved first criticality in 1954. Research reactors R2 and R2-0 were built in Studsvik and started operation at the beginning of the 1960s.

The construction of the first prototype NPP, Ĺgesta, started in 1957. The Swedish engineering company ASEA was the main contractor involved in the design. Ĺgesta was a pressurized water reactor cooled by heavy water (PHWR), with a thermal power of 80 MW(th). The reactor was built in a bedrock cave near a suburb of Stockholm and was mainly used for district heating. Commercial operation started in 1964 and the plant was permanently shut down in 1974. By 1965, ASEA was awarded a contract for the design of a boiling water reactor (BWR) to be built in Oskarshamn. This unit, Oskarshamn 1, started operation in 1972. In 1968, ASEA-Atom, a joint venture between the Swedish State and ASEA, was created, and between 1974 and 1985 another 11 nuclear power reactor units began operation at the sites in Barsebäck, Oskarshamn, Ringhals and Forsmark. Eight of these new reactors were BWRs of ASEA-Atom design while the remaining three were 3-loop PWRs of Westinghouse design built in Ringhals.

Public support for nuclear power declined after the accident at Three Mile Island, and a referendum on nuclear power was held in Sweden in 1980. As a result of the referendum, the Government decided that nuclear power should be phased out by 2010. Furthermore, it was decided that all the existing NPPs had to be equipped with severe accident mitigation systems, including a system for filtered venting, before the end of 1988.

In 1988, two years after the accident at the Chornobyl NPP, the Government decided to begin the phase-out at an earlier date than originally planned and to close one unit in Barsebäck and one in Ringhals in 1995 and 1996. The decision was reversed in 1991. In 1997, the 2010 phase-out target was dropped altogether. At the same time, the Government decided to permanently shut down the NPP in Barsebäck and the two units in Barsebäck terminated operation in 1999 and 2005.

In 2004, Studsvik Nuclear AB decided to shut down the two research reactors at the Studsvik site. The Studsvik research reactors were closed in June 2005 and decommissioning was completed in 2019.

During the 2000s and 2010s, the NPPs in Forsmark, Oskarshamn and Ringhals underwent extensive modernization, in order to meet new regulation requirements introduced in 2004. In the same period, an ambitious programme of power uprates started.

The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi NPP in 2011 and the European Union stress test that followed led to the formulation in 2014 of a National Action Plan, where the regulator decided that any nuclear power reactor in operation after 2020 should be equipped with an independent core cooling system. The system should be designed to provide core cooling independently of all other emergency core cooling systems, and able to withstand extended loss of main heat sink and of power supply.

In 2015, the owners of the power plants in Oskarshamn and Ringhals decided on the closure of Oskarshamn 1 and 2 and Ringhals 1 and 2 ahead of the originally planned shutdown date. This decision was based on low profitability in the electric power production sector, combined with the need for plant modifications to meet the new regulatory requirements. As a result, Oskarshamn 2, not in operation since 2013 owing to an ongoing modernization project, was never restarted and Oskarshamn 1 terminated operation in 2017. Ringhals 2 terminated operation in December 2019 and Ringhals 1 in December 2020.

The profitability issues in the nuclear industry were addressed within the overall agreement on Sweden’s energy policy in June 2016 when the multiparty Energy Commission proposed to remove a tax on installed reactor capacity. Subsequently, this tax was lifted by the Government. In parallel, a compensatory increase in the tax on electricity was introduced, however, with an exemption for electricity intensive industry.

In 2021, six nuclear reactors are in operation in Sweden: three units in Forsmark, two in Ringhals and one in Oskarshamn. The licensees of these reactors currently plan for 60 years of operation, until the 2040s. There is currently no official end date for nuclear energy in Sweden.

In principle, new nuclear power reactors may be built at existing reactor sites to replace existing and closed reactors. However, the total number of reactors in Sweden at any time is limited to ten.

Sweden’s NPPs are largely co-owned by several utilities (additional information is provided in Fig. 4 in Section 2.5).

The licensees according to the Act on Nuclear Activities are the three NPP operators Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB, OKG AB and Ringhals AB. Sweden’s regulator, the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM), reports to the Ministry of Environment and is tasked with the responsibility of the oversight of NPP safety.

The Swedish State has a stake in the ownership of NPPs since the Swedish utility Vattenfall is a state-owned enterprise reporting to the Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation.

The nuclear safety strategy defined by the amended EU Nuclear Safety Directive (Directive 2014/87/Euratom) and the Swedish national (legislative, regulatory and organizational) framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations, is to drive continuous safety improvements based on regular and systematic reassessments, aiming at ensuring compliance with legal requirements, renewal requirements and up-to-date design basis. The strategy also includes identification of further safety improvements by taking into account ageing issues, operational experience, the most recent research and development (R&D), and developments in international standards.

There are six nuclear power reactors in operation in Sweden, as shown in Table 5 and Fig. 1. Seven nuclear power reactors have been permanently shut down, namely Ĺgesta, Barsebäck 1 and 2, Oskarshamn 1 and 2, and Ringhals 1 and 2. All BWRs were designed by the Swedish vendor ASEA-Atom (later ABB Atom, now Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB) and all PWRs, except Ĺgesta (an ASEA design), were designed by Westinghouse.

Fig. 2 shows the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) events in Sweden since 1991.

TABLE 5. STATUS AND PERFORMANCE OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

FIG. 1. Location of the nuclear facilities in Sweden. Source: Sweden’s 8th National Report under the Convention on Nuclear Safety [1].

FIG. 2. International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) events in Sweden since 1991. Source: Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.

In 2019, the nuclear share of electricity generation in Sweden was 39%. In the same year, Sweden’s NPPs averaged a unit capability factor of 88.5%.

In the period 2010–2020, eleven events were classified as Level 1 events according to the INES scale. The last event classified as Level 2 was in 2006 at Forsmark 1, and resulted in the loss of power in two safety trains. The event identified a number of design deficiencies related to electrical power supply to systems and components important to safety in NPPs. The findings led to a new focus on the robustness of safety related electrical systems, both nationally and internationally, for example within the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD/NEA).

A reactor’s highest allowed thermal power is specified in the operating licence. Since the licence is granted by the Government, in order to perform a power uprate, the licensee must apply to the Government to obtain a change of the licence condition regarding the reactor thermal power, in accordance with the Act on Nuclear Activities.

Depending on the magnitude of the power uprate, a power increase can affect the facility to varying degrees. Therefore, conditions and parameters that might affect safety must be identified and analysed in order to sufficiently demonstrate that the safety requirements can be met at the new power level. Consequently, planning as well as reviewing a power uprate are key aspects to ensure that there is no impact on plant safety.

Regulatory requirements stipulate that, before entering the test programme with operation at uprated power, the licensee must update the safety report with as-built information. Before the plant enters routine operation after the uprate, the safety report should be updated to include lessons learned during the test programme.

In its regulatory review of a power uprate application, SSM checks that the licensee complies with applicable safety requirements.

Several reactors in Sweden were uprated in the 1980s, with additional power uprates over the past 14 years. The levels are illustrated in Fig. 3.

FIG. 3. Power uprates levels of reactors in operation in Sweden (the light blue bars are for power uprates over the past 14 years). Source: Sweden’s 8th National Report under the Convention on Nuclear Safety [1].

Proposed plant modifications are submitted to SSM. The regulator might in this case review the submitted modification or some part of it. An overview of major plant modifications performed in the NPPs currently in operation in Sweden is available in Appendix 1 of Sweden’s National Report under the Convention on Nuclear Safety.

The operational licence for NPPs in Sweden does not contain time limitations. However, at any moment during a plant’s lifetime, the Government or the regulator might define requirements for continued operation, including requirements that imply plant modifications. For example, after the accident at Three Mile Island, severe accident management systems (including the filtered containment venting system) were required by the Government at the Swedish NPPs. Also, extensive modernization programmes were initiated in 2005 and completed in 2015 for all NPPs in Sweden in order to meet new requirements issued by the regulator in 2004. In 2014, SSM required the introduction of an independent core cooling system for NPPs operating after 2020.

The responsibility for decommissioning and waste disposal lies with the licensee. To ensure that financing is available for future decommissioning and disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste, including the research needed for these activities, licensees must pay a fee on each kWh produced to a State controlled fund, the Nuclear Waste Fund, in accordance with the Act on Financing of Management of Residual Products from Nuclear Activities. In addition, the power plant licensees must provide financial guarantees in order to account for possible early shutdowns and costs that might results from unforeseen events. The Nuclear Waste Fund also handles disbursements from the fund. The National Debt Office decides how fund assets may be used.

Table 6 shows the status of the process of NPP decommissioning in Sweden.

TABLE 6. STATUS OF DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

1. Decommissioning and dismantling (D&D) of the reactor will be completed by 2028, release of site after the permanent shutdown of unit 3.

2. D&D of the reactor will be completed by 2028, interim storage of e.g. reactor internals until 2045, i.e. until final geological repository is constructed and in operation.

3. D&D of the reactor will be completed by ~2028; release of site after the permanent shutdown of units 3 and 4.

Barsebäck Kraft AB and OKG AB were granted a licence to decommission and dismantle Barsebäck 1 and 2 and Oskarshamn 1 and 2, respectively. Vattenfall AB was granted licences for dismantling and demolition of the Ĺgesta reactor. Ringhals AB has not yet applied for the authorization to proceed with dismantling and demolition of Ringhals 1 and 2. The units are permanently shut down since the end of 2020 and 2019 respectively. The fuel was unloaded and is stored on-site until its transport to the central interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel (Clab) in 2022. Planning for decommissioning and dismantling as well as preparatory activities are ongoing.

In Sweden, R&D in nuclear technology is mainly concentrated at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm (KTH), Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg and Uppsala University.

Sweden’s three NPP operators, Westinghouse Electric Sweden and SSM jointly support these three universities through the Swedish Centre of Nuclear Technology (SKC), formed in 1992. SKC supports undergraduate and graduate education as well as research.

SKC opened in 1992 amid a pending nuclear phase-out decision and low student enrolment in nuclear studies. At that time, the industry and the regulator faced similar challenges in competence development, in general, and staff renewal in particular. The situation during the early days of SKC presents similarities to today’s situation, with the recent shutdown of four reactors. This has introduced new challenges for maintaining sufficient nuclear competence in the country.

SSM provides financial support for basic and applied research at a number of Sweden’s universities, as well as for companies providing R&D services on related nuclear competency topics. The Swedish Government has given SSM the task of evaluating the R&D funding needed to maintain national competence in the nuclear technology field to comply with European Union directives, conventions and IAEA standards. The evaluation identified R&D needs stemming from the presence of operating nuclear power reactors in the country while taking into account a decreasing number of reactors in operation in Sweden. SSM’s conclusion stipulates a need to increase R&D funding in the areas of reactor physics, thermohydraulics, nuclear data, severe accidents and nuclear chemistry.

Vattenfall provided joint funding for a new bachelor’s degree programme on nuclear power at Uppsala University, launched in 2019. Moreover, the nuclear industry and Uppsala University have a long term cooperation agreement to train staff in nuclear technology and radiation protection within the Nordic Academy for Nuclear Safety and Security (NANSS). Over time, this effort has also resulted in closer contacts between students and the nuclear industry.

Furthermore, Vattenfall was a major partner in KIC InnoEnergy (Knowledge & Innovation Community) during the development of the master’s programme EMINE (European Master in Nuclear Energy), where students attend one year in Barcelona or at KTH, and one year in France. Around 20 students graduate annually from the EMINE programme.

Research projects on Generation IV technology are carried out at some universities in Sweden. LeadCold Reactors, a KTH spinoff company, is developing a lead cooled reactor concept and collaborates with KTH, Luleĺ University of Technology and Uppsala University in a feasibility study for a research reactor that might potentially be built at the Oskarshamn site. The project recently received funding from the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research under the foundation’s initiative supporting the Sustainable Development Goals set in 2015 by the United Nations.

In addition, the Swedish Research Council is providing funding for projects in the area of Generation IV technology, allowing researchers in Sweden to participate in major international research programmes.

Furthermore, Vattenfall announced in 2020 that the company will take part in an Estonian pilot study on small modular reactors.

Sweden actively participates in many international research projects. SSM collaborates on research projects conducted by the European Union and OECD/NEA in a wide range of fields, including fuel technology, thermohydraulics and severe accidents. Sweden hosts the OECD/NEA Studsvik Cladding Integrity Project (SCIP-4), where experimental work is performed in the facilities of Studsvik Nuclear AB. SSM also provides funding for research organizations in Sweden that participate in European Union and OECD/NEA projects.

Moreover, SSM cooperates with other government agencies internationally, such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the United States of America, the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) in Finland and the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI). In particular, cooperation with the NRC is important in order to have access to models and computer programs developed for three dimensional coupled thermohydraulic simulations, neutron kinetic calculations, as well as severe accident analyses, within the Code Application and Maintenance Program (CAMP) and Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program (CSARP) agreements.

The cooperation with other Nordic countries is particularly active, for example within NKS (Nordic Nuclear Safety Research) and NPSAG (Nordic PSA Group).

NKS performs nuclear research within the areas of reactor safety and emergency preparedness and response. From Sweden’s side, NKS is financed by SSM, the NPPs and SKB.

NPSAG is a forum focused on R&D needs in the field of probabilistic safety analysis (PSA). The NPSAG members are the NPPs in Sweden and Finland and the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB). SSM as well as the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) in Finland are associate members of NPSAG, taking part in the funding of the projects within the group.

The Atomic Energy Board (Delegationen för atomenergifrĺgor) was created in 1956, which is also when the first law in Sweden regulating nuclear energy was approved. This organization dealt with the utilization of nuclear energy and reported to the Ministry of Commerce. Oversight of nuclear installations was delegated to a section of the Atomic Energy Board called the Reactor Siting Committee (Reaktorförläggningskommittén). The Atomic Energy Board was disbanded in 1974, when a regulatory body for nuclear safety, the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (Kärnkraftinspektionen), was created. The Reactor Siting Committee then became an advisory board for the newly created Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate.

The Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate was responsible for regulating and overseeing the country’s nuclear activities from fuel fabrication to NPP operation and waste disposal. Issues such as security of nuclear installations and non-proliferation were within its scope of responsibility as well.

The need for regulatory oversight in the field of radiation protection was recognized early on with the introduction of a radiation protection law in 1941. Initially, this oversight focused on medical radiation protection and the responsibility to oversee radiation protection practices was given to the Department of Medical Radiation Physics at the Karolinska Institute. In 1960, the Swedish Government gave the department the task of creating an expert commission that could work as an advisory board to the Government in case of nuclear accidents.

In 1965, the Radiation Protection Institute (Strĺlskyddsinstitut) was created and took over the regulation and oversight of radiation protection issues. The Radiation Protection Institute defined, for example, acceptance criteria for the radiation doses to the general public and nuclear workers.

Given the partially overlapping areas of responsibility, the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate and the Radiation Protection Institute collaborated in some areas of nuclear safety and radiation protection.

In 2008 the two organizations were merged into a new regulatory authority, the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (Strĺlsäkerhetsmyndigheten, SSM), with a mandate from the Government of Sweden to regulate and perform oversight within the areas of nuclear safety and security, radiation protection and nuclear non-proliferation. It should be pointed out that Swedish law regulates nuclear safety and security in an integrated manner. As a licensing authority for activities in the field of nuclear safety and radiation protection, SSM reviews licence applications and decides whether to issue a licence, or advises the Government on licences which are issued by the Government, such as the licence to build and operate an NPP or a final repository for spent fuel. SSM also provides recommendations and expert advice to other authorities and to the Government during emergencies involving radiation risks. Furthermore, SSM supports R&D activities in the field of nuclear safety and radiation protection and participates in international projects aimed at promoting nuclear and radiation safety abroad.

SSM reports to the Ministry of the Environment and is led by a Director General appointed by the Government. SSM’s organization is shown in Fig. 6.

FIG. 6. Organization of the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.

The licensing process for nuclear facilities is governed by several regulations with different purposes and therefore involves coordination by a number of different authorities.

New nuclear facilities and major modifications of existing facilities must be evaluated under both the Act on Nuclear Activities and the Swedish Environmental Code. As stipulated by the procedure for applications, a licence application must be submitted to the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, which will process the matter under the Act on Nuclear Activities, and to the Land and Environment Court, which will process the case under the Swedish Environmental Code. Applications in both kinds of matters, even matters under the Act on Nuclear Activities, are to be accompanied by an environmental impact assessment under Chapter 6 of the Environmental Code.

Fig. 7 illustrates the licensing process for the construction of a new nuclear facility. In the first step in the licensing process, the Government issues a statement of permissibility under the Swedish Environmental Code. The statement of permissibility is based both on an evaluation performed by the Land and the Environment Court on the basis of the Environmental Code and on an evaluation performed by SSM on the basis of the Act on Nuclear Activities. The Government may issue a positive statement of permissibility only if the municipal authority concerned accepts the siting of the facility within its municipality.

After the Government issues a statement of permissibility under the Environmental Code, licences need be issued for the nuclear facility according to the Act on Nuclear Activities, and also according to the Environmental Code since a nuclear facility is an environmentally hazardous activity.

The Land and Environment Court issues a licence according to the Environmental Code and determines licence conditions.

The Government issues the licence according to the Act on Nuclear Activities on the basis of a recommendation from SSM. The licence is subject to licence conditions, which are issued either by the Government or by SSM. For example, the maximum allowed thermal effect of a reactor is typically one of the licence conditions issued by the Government. Other conditions issued by the Government establish whether a formal approval from SSM is needed to begin construction, commissioning or regular operation. Based on these licence conditions, a stepwise review process follows, where SSM decides at each stage if the licensee is allowed to proceed to the next stage.

FIG. 7. Licensing process for nuclear facilities. Source: Sweden’s 8th National Report under the Convention on Nuclear Safety [1].

A licence application is reviewed in open court hearings at the Land and Environment Court. The applicant must describe all relevant aspects of its case and questions may be submitted during the proceedings. All interested parties are allowed to attend the hearings.

It should be noted that for all nuclear power reactors in operation in Sweden, the operating licence is not time limited. This means that the operation of a nuclear power reactor is allowed as long as the licensee meets the requirements set by the applicable laws, Government ordinances, SSM regulations and conditions imposed by the initial licence.