Return To: Session FT1 - Fusion Technology 1
Prev Page: Session FT1 - Fusion Technology 1
Next Page: (FT1/D) Discussion of Section FT1

(FT1/5) European Contributions to the Beam Source Design and R&D of the ITER Neutral Beam Injectors

P. Massmann¹, P. Bayetti¹, J. Bucalossi¹, C. Desgranges¹, E. Di Pietro³, P. Frank², M. Fumelli¹, Y. Fujiwara⁴, M. Hanada⁴, B. Heinemann², R. Hemsworth¹, T. Inoue³, C. Jacquot¹, W. Kraus², Y. Okumura⁴, F. Probst² , A. Simonin¹, E. Speth², R. Trainham¹and O. Vollmer²

¹ Association EURATOM - CEA Cadarache, DRFC / SCCP, 13108 ST PAUL LEZ DURANCE Cedex, France
² Association EURATOM - Max Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik, 85748 GARCHING, Germany
³ ITER JCT, Naka JWS, 801-1 Mukouyama, Naka-machi, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, Japan 331-0193
⁴ Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute JAERI, 801-1 Mukouyama, Naka-machi, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, Japan 331-0193

Abstract.  The paper reports on the progress made by the European Home Team in strong interaction with the ITER JCT and JAERI regarding several key aspects of the beam source for the ITER injectors:

• integration of the SINGAP accelerator into the ITER injector design. This is a substantially simpler concept than the MAMuG accelerator of the ITER NBI `reference design', which has potential for significant cost savings, and which avoids some of the weaknesses of the reference design such as the need for intermediate high voltage potentials from the HV power supply and pressurised gas insulation;
• high energy negative ion acceleration using a SINGAP accelerator;
• long pulse (i.e. >1000 s) negative ion source operation in deuterium;
• RF source development, which could reduce the scheduled maintenance of the ITER injectors (as it uses no filaments), and simplify the transmission line and the auxiliary power supplies for the ion source.

 

Read the full paper in PDF format.