back

MEXICO

(updated on Dec. 20001)

1.  ENERGY, ECONOMIC AND ELECTRICITY INFORMATION

1.1.  General Overview

Mexico is located in the southern part of the North American continent. In the north it has a common boundary with the United Sates, in the south with Guatemala and Belize, to the east lies the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean sea, and to the west the Pacific Ocean. Its extreme latitudes are 32°43'N in the north and 14°33'N in the south. Its extreme longitudes are 86°46' West of Greenwich in the east and 117°08' West of Greenwich in the west. The total surface of Mexico is 1,958,200 km2.

Two main features have to be taken into account regarding the climate of Mexico, in the first place the existence of two mountain ranges, one following the pacific coast and the other the Gulf of Mexico coast with a high plateau between the two ranges and, in the second place, the fact that the country is divided into two by the Tropic of Cancer. In a very broad sense, the climate south of the Tropic of Cancer is warm with an average temperature around 22°C, when the altitude above sea level is below 1,000m, and the climate is temperate with an average temperature around 15°C, above 1,000m where the altitude prevails, with a broad daily oscillation. North of the Tropic of Cancer the climate is warm during the summer and cold during the winter, with occasional snowfalls. The four traditional seasons are only felt in some parts in the north of the country. The rest divides the year in two periods: the rainy season, that goes from April to September and the dry season embracing the rest of the year.

The Laguna Verde Nuclear Power Plant is located in the coast of the Gulf of Mexico at a latitude of 19°43'30" North and a longitude of 96°23'15" West. The climate is warm and humid, with rain during the summer and with little precipitation during winter. The annual average humidity is 80%, during the year the temperature oscillates between a minimum of 8°C and a maximum of 39°C. The prevailing winds, especially during summer, blow from the Northeast; during winter the site is affected by winds coming from the north with velocities between 70 and 90 km. per hour. The seawater, which is used as cooling water, has an average annual temperature of 26°C, with a maximum during summer of 32°C and a minimum in winter of 21°C.

In 1993, the Mexican population reached almost 90 millions inhabitants (see Table 1) and it was estimated to grow with 1.6 million in absolute terms in 1994. The population growth rate in 1993 was 2 per cent and the population density 46 inhabitants per square kilometre.

TABLE 1. POPULATION INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average annual

growth rate(%)

 

1970

1980

1990

2000

2005

2007

2000

To 2007

Population (millions)

Population density (inhabitants/km2)

50.6

67.6

83.2

97.7

103.9

105.3

0.98

 

25.8

34.5

42.5

49.7

52.9

53.6

0.98

Urban Population as % of total

59

66.3

72.5

74.7

76

77

0.99

Area (1000 KM2)

1964.4

 

Source: INEGI AND BANK OF MEXICO

 

1.1.1.  Economic Indicators

The total Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 1999 was 346 billion constant 1990 US$ and its annual growth rate over the last 5 years was about 5 per cent (Table 2).


TABLE 2. GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)

TABLE 2. GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average annual

growth rate(%)

 

1970

1980

1990

2000

2005

2007

2000

To 2007

GDP (millions of current

US$)

35'542

194'357

262'710

581'426

846'990

1'022'820

10.85

GDP(millions of constant

2000 US$)

180'954

345'563

413'325

581'426

635'322

846'461

6.51

GDP per capita (PPP* US$/capita)

GDP per capita (currentUS$/capita)

1'049

4'292

4'711

8'857

11'113

14'495

9.09

 

703

2'876

3'157

5'935

7'447

9'713

9.09

Source: IAEA Energy and Economic Database.

* PPP : Purchasing Power Parity

** Lastest available information

 

1.1.2.  Energy Situation

Mexico has abundant oil, gas, coal and hydro resources (Table 3). The total proven reserves of hydrocarbons amount to 63,220 millions barrels, equivalent to 48 years of the present production. Mexico is not only energy self sufficient, but is also a net exporter of energy.


TABLE 3. ESTIMATED ENERGY RESERVES

 

Estimated energy reserves in (*)(Solid and Liquid in million tons, Uranium in metric tons, Gas in billion cubic metres, Hydro in TWhr per year)

 

Fossil Fuels

Nuclear

Renowables

 

Solid (1)

Liquid (2)

Gas (3)

Uranium (4)

Hydro (5)

Other Renowables

Total amount especific units

1'211.00

1'814.00

392.20

1'275.00

52.41

 

Total amount in Exajolue (EJ)

50.70

75.90

15.05

0.37

0.18

 

(*) Source: 20th WEC Survey of Energy Resouses, 2004 and Uranium 2005: Resourses, Production and Demand ("RedB   k") Source: IAEA Energy and Economic Database.

(1) Coal including Lignite: proved recoverable reserves, the tonnage within the proved amount in place that can be recovered in the future under present and expected
local economic conditions with exsiting available technology

(2)  Crude oil and natural gas liquid (Oil Shale, Natural Bitumen and Extra-Heavy Oil are not includes): proved recoverable reserves, the quantity within the proved amount
in place that can be recoverd in the future under present and expected local economic conditions with existing avalaible technology

(3)  Natural gas: proved recoverable reserves, the volume within the proved amountn in place that can be recovered in the future present and expected local economic conditions with exiting avalaible technology.

(4)  Reasonably Assured Resourses (RAR) under <UDS 130kgU

(5)  Hyrdropower: tecnhnically exploitable capability, the amount of the gross theoretical capability that can be exploited within hliifhl

 

Mexico depends heavily on hydrocarbons, during 1993 the primary energy production came 72.3% from crude oil and condensates, 17.4% from natural gas, 4.4% from biomass, 3.1% from hydro, 1.5% from coal, 0.7% from geothermal fields and 0.6% from nuclear energy. Roughly half of the crude oil production is exported and half used to satisfy the internal needs. Discounting the energy resources exported, which are mainly oil and a little bit of coal and electricity, and taking into account the energy resources imported, consisting of some hydrocarbon products and some coal, the internal energy offer is divided in the following way: 56.7% crude oil and condensates, 26.4% natural gas, 7.0% biomass, 4.9% hydro, 3.0% coal, 1.1% geothermal energy and 0.9% nuclear energy. Some of this energy goes directly into final consumption, this is the case of biomass, about 10% goes into non energy uses and the rest is transformed into electricity and secondary energy products as gasoline, fuel oil, etc.

The final energy consumption in 1993 was divided in the following way: 39.9% in transportation, 33.7% in industry, 23.8% in commercial and residential uses and 2.6% in agriculture. Table 4 shows the historical energy statistics.

1.2. Energy Policy

The government's energy policy is based on four main strategies:

Specific actions that have been implemented to achieve this include the production of less contaminant fuels, like unleaded gasoline and sulphur free diesel, and the diversification of primary energy sources, since the country relies too heavily on hydrocarbons.

Diversification has been promoted especially in the electricity sector, with the inclusion of geothermal energy, nuclear energy, some solar energy in rural areas isolated from the electrical grid and recently with the addition of some wind energy.


TABLE 4. ENERGY STATISTICS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average annual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

growth rate (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2000

 

1970

1980

1990

2000

2005

2007

To 2007

Energy consumption

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Total(1)

1.73

3.94

4.98

6.93

10.69

10.52

7.40

- Solids(2)

0.17

0.23

0.26

0.4

0.22

0.25

-5.36

- Liquids

0.99

2.6

3.46

4.44

7.76

7.03

8.34

- Gases

0.42

0.93

0.97

1.64

1.89

2.12

4.20

- Primary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

electricity(3)

0.15

0.18

0.29

0.46

0.47

0.46

0.00

Energy production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Total

1.74

5.89

7.77

10.2

16.75

18.37

11.44

- Solids

0.16

0.19

0.25

0.34

0.94

0.94

25.21

- Liquids

0.98

4.48

6.26

7.86

8.75

8.95

1.98

- Gases

0.45

1.04

0.96

1.55

2.39

3.45

17.51

- Primary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

electricity(3)

0.14

0.17

0.3

0.45

4.48

4.72

135.56

Net import (Import -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Export)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Total

-0.07

-1.93

-2.74

-3.05

-223.89

-167.78

771.57

- Solids

0.01

0.03

0.01

0.08

-224.09

-167.71

N/A

- Liquids

-0.06

-1.85

0.19

0.19

0.25

0.20

0.75

- Gases

-0.03

-0.11

-0.05

-0.23

-0.05

-0.27

2.48

 
 

Energy consumption = Primary energy consumption + Net import (Import - Export) of Solid fuels include coal, lignite and commercial wood. Primary electricity = Hydro + Geothermal + Nuclear + Wind. (*) Energy values are in Exajoule except where indicated. Source: IAEA Energy and Economic Database.

 

1.3.  The Electricity System

1.3.1.  Structure of the Electricity Sector

Due to historical reasons the electric service is provided by two governmental organizations: Central Light and Power, which serves Mexico City metropolitan area and some parts of the states of Mexico, Morelos, Hidalgo, Puebla and Tlaxcala; and the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) which serves the rest of the country.

Almost all the generation is provided by CFE, Central Light and Power generates only a small fraction of its requirements. The peninsula of Baja California has two small independent systems, the northern one is interconnected to the United States. The rest of the country is served by an integrated system, which is controlled by CFE.

Only about 6.5% of the total generation of the country is provided by some private industries for their own consumption. In the past the generation and distribution of electricity has, by law, rested in the hands of the government, however, recent law modifications allow the generation of electricity by the private sector and promote the use of cogeneration.

1.3.2.  Policy and Decision Making Process

Energy policy and, specifically, electricity industry policy, is the responsibility of the Ministry of Energy. Policy for the electricity industry is published in a document called "Electricity sector outlook", a 10 year programme revised annually that incorporates analyses of present electricity demand and supply, the projected evolution of national and regional demand, the proposed expansion plan for generation, transmission and distribution capacity and the estimation of required investments. The elaboration of this programme is coordinated by the Ministry of Energy and done with the help of a multidisciplinary group formed by the federal electricity commission (CFE), the central power and light company (LFC), the Mexican petroleum company (PEMEX), the energy regulatory commission (CRE), the electricity research institute (IIE) and the national commission for energy efficiency and savings (CONAE).

Electricity demand is expected to grow at a rate of 6.1% annually for the 10-year period starting in 1999, requiring for the same period an additional capacity of 22,248 MW. This expansion rate, the largest in the country's history, will represent an opportunity for private investment. Due to a lack of public funds in the last few years, a large part of the added capacity has been possible through private investment IPP and BLT schemes, and this participation is likely to continue in the future. Transmission and distribution will continue to be the responsibility of the government.

Most of the future generation capacity is expected to be based on gas fired, combined cycle type plants due to their cleaner emissions, lower investment costs, shorter construction periods and higher thermal efficiency compared to other conventional fossil fuelled plants.

1.3.3.  Main Indicators

From 1980 to 2000 the electricity generation has grown 5.8 % annually on the average, going from 66,950 GW·h in 1980 to 207,040 GW·h in 2000 (Table 5). At the end of 2000 the total installed generating capacity was 50,250 MW(e) of which 74.7% was thermal, 21.7% hydro, 1.5% geothermal and 2.7% nuclear. For the same year, the total electricity generation was 207,040 GW·h, 82.2% coming from thermal energy, 11.4% from hydro, 2.6% from geothermal and 3.8% from nuclear. The corresponding average load factors were: for thermal plants 52%, for hydro 25% and for nuclear 66%. Table 6 shows the energy related ratios from EEDB.


TABLE 5. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION AND INSTALLED CAPACITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average annual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

growth rate (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2000

 

1970

1980

1990

2000

2005

2007

To 2007

Electricity production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(TW-h)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Total(1)

28.71

66.95

122.45

192.72

217.16

230.93

2.83

- Thermal

13.70

49.13

90.84

145.52

180.45

185.82

3.96

- Hydro

15.01

16.91

23.54

33.08

27.61

27.04

-2.61

- Nuclear

 

 

2.94

8.22

1.80

10.42

3.82

- Geothermal

 

0.92

5.12

5.90

7.30

7.65

4.23

Capacity of electrical

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

plants (GWe)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Total

7.32

16.99

28.48

40.98

54.10

57.19

5.65

- Thermal

3.98

10.77

19.23

29.15

41.32

43.68

7.13

- Hydro

3.33

6.06

7.88

9.62

10.26

10.85

1.82

- Nuclear

 

 

0.68

1.36

1.37

1.37

0.05

- Geothermal

 

0.15

0.70

0.85

0.95

1.00

2.59

- Wind

 

 

 

0.22

0.22

0.23

0.82

 

(1) Electricity losses are not deducted.(*) Energy values are in Exajoule except where indicated. Source: IAEA Energy and Economic Database. Secretaria de Energia, Mexico.

 

TABLE 6. ENERGY RELATED RATIOS

 

1970

1980

1990

2000

2005

2007

Energy consumption

 

 

 

 

 

 

per capita (GJ/capita)

34

58

60

70

75

79

Electricity per capita

 

 

 

 

 

 

(kW-h/capita)

570

999

1'384

2'753

2'895

2'923

Electricity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production/Energy

 

 

 

 

 

 

production (%)

16

11

15

22

28

29

Nuclear/Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

electricity (%)

0

0

2.4

3.9

4.9

4.2

Ratio of external

 

 

 

 

 

 

dependency (%)(1)

0

0

0

0

-3

-2

Load factor of

 

 

 

 

 

 

electricity plants

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Total

45

45

49

57

79

80

- Thermal

39

52

54

81

78

80

- Hydro

51

32

34

89

88

84

- Nuclear

 

 

49

66

93

90

 

(1) Net import / Total energy consumption. Source: IAEA Energy and Economic Database.

 

2.  NUCLEAR POWER SITUATION

Mexico is energy self sufficient, not only that, but it is also a net exporter of energy, however it is highly dependent on hydrocarbons, almost all the energy exported is in the form of crude oil and about 90% of the energy used in the country comes from oil and gas, only about 5% comes from hydro. In order to alleviate this situation, Mexico has recently incorporated other forms of energy like geothermal, coal and, from 1990 on, also nuclear energy.

2.1.  Historical Development and current nuclear power organizational structure1

2.1.1.  Overview

The National Commission for Nuclear Energy (CNEN) was established in 1956 to pave the way for the introduction of nuclear power and nuclear applications in Mexico. CNEN encompassed all the nuclear activities in the country (exploration for uranium, nuclear research, regulation, etc.) but the generation of electricity by nuclear means (which was the sole responsibility of the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE)) and the radioisotopes utilization. Later on the CNEN was transformed into the National Institute on Nuclear Energy (INEN), which redefined the attributes but with very few changes.

In 1979, INEN disappeared and was substituted by three organizations: The National Institute of Nuclear Research (ININ) in charge of all the aspects related to research, Mexican Uranium (URAMEX) in charge of uranium exploration and, eventually, uranium production and the National Commission on Nuclear Safety and Safeguards (CNSNS) in charge of nuclear regulation and safeguards. In 1985, URAMEX disappeared and all its functions passed to the Ministry of Energy.

The interest of Mexico in nuclear power dates back to the early 60's and the first concrete steps were taken in 1966, when a preliminary investigation of potential sites for nuclear power stations was carried out under the auspices of CFE and the National Commission for Nuclear Energy. At the end of the 60's, the government concluded that nuclear power plants might play a major role. In early 1969, CFE decided to invite bids for a 600 MW(e) nuclear power plant of a proven type and invitations to tender were sent to several manufacturers. The bids were received at the beginning of 1970, but the final decision, with up-to-date bids, was taken in the middle of 1972. In 1976, the construction of the Laguna Verde Nuclear Power Plant (LVNPP) was initiated, comprising two reactors of 654 MW(e) net each. The first unit went into commercial operation in 1990 and the second in April 1995.

2.1.2.  Current Organizational Chart(s)

Figure 1 shows the structure of the Mexican nuclear power sector.

figure 1

figure 1a

FIG. 1. Organizational Chart

 

2.2.  Nuclear Power Plants: Status and Operations

As mentioned above there is only one nuclear plant in operation with two BWR reactors of 654 MW(e) net each (Table 7). For the time being there are no plans regarding new units or new plants. The National Energy Plan issued in 1990, for the time being is still valid, however it will probably be revised in the near future.

Laguna Verde unit 1 went into commercial operation in 1990, its performance has been quiet good since the very beginning. Unit 2 went into commercial operation in April 1995. With the two units in operation, nuclear energy is expected to account between five and six percent of the total electricity production.


TABLE 7. STATUS NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Station Type Net Operator Status Reactor Construction Criticality Grid Commercial Shutdown
    Cpacity (Mwe)     Supplier Date Date Date Date Date
LAGUNA VERDE-1 BWR   680 CFE Operational GE 01-Oct-76 08-Nov-88 13-Apr-89 29-Jul-90  
LAGUNA VERDE-2 BWR   680 CFE Operational GE 01-Jun-77 06-Sep-94 11-Nov-94 10-Apr-95  

Source: IAEA Power Reactor Information System as of 31 December 2006.

 

2.3.  Supply of NPPs

There are no NPP's suppliers in the country. The main components of the Laguna Verde plant were acquired abroad. At the beginning, the main architect engineer for unit 1 was the Electric Bond and Share Company (EBASCO), but later on, and specially for unit 2, CFE acted as architect engineer with the advice of EBASCO and General Electric (GE).

2.4.  Operation of NPPs

The Laguna Verde plant is owned by CFE, the operation and maintenance is done by CFE personnel. In the past, the operator training was done at several similar installations in Spain and the United States. Nowadays, the training is mainly done locally, using the simulator which has been installed at the plant's premises.

2.5.  Fuel Cycle and Waste Management

2.5.1.  Fuel Cycle

Mexico is not producing uranium due to the low cost of uranium currently available on the world market. For the next years, the required uranium for reloads of Laguna Verde will be obtained from the world market, since currently there are no plans for producing uranium in Mexico. Some 2,000 tons of uranium reserves have been identified in Mexico, but they are too expensive to exploit considering current prices.

Uranium is bought either as hexafluoride or as concentrate that is converted to hexafluoride by Comurhex in France through a long-term contract. Enrichment is provided by the United States' Department of Energy also through a long-term contract. Fuel fabrication is currently done in the United States by General Electric (GE). Four assemblies supplied by Siemens are being tested in the fourth cycle of Unit 1 of Laguna Verde and there are plans to test also four assemblies supplied by ASEA-BROWN BOVERI (ABB-ATOM) in the near future.

A fuel fabrication pilot plant is almost ready to start operation at the National Nuclear Research Institute using technology provided by General Electric of USA. This pilot plant could produce up to 20 fuel assemblies per year for the Laguna Verde reactors, however after some experience is gained with the operation of the plant and the fuel produced, the plant will probably be shut down since it is not economical to fabricate nuclear fuel at this scale.

As for spent nuclear fuel, the current plans are to store it at the reactors' pools, which have been re-racked to increase the original capacity in order to accommodate the spent fuel that the reactors will produce during their expected operating life. This plan allows time to take a more definite decision depending on future developments in uranium availability and price, expansion of the Mexican nuclear power capacity, new technologies, etc.

2.5.2.  Waste Management

A repository exists in Mexico for all the low and intermediate level wastes produced in medical and industrial facilities. This repository will be closed in the near future to avoid social problems due to the population growth in the vicinity.

For the Laguna Verde Plant, the high level waste is being stored at the plant. As for the low and intermediate level waste produced by the plant, detailed site studies are now under way at the same plant site in order to determine the engineering design basis for a "triple barrier" repository using the French approach. The repository is planned to have capacity for the waste generated during the operating life of at least four nuclear reactor units and could also include the waste generated by the medical and industrial facilities in the country.

2.6.  Research and Development

The main research centres are the National Institute of Nuclear Research (ININ) and the Electric Research Institute (IIE).

2.7.  International Co-operation and Initiatives

Research and development activities carried out jointly with other countries.

  1. Agreement of co-operation between the Mexican Electric Research Institute and the Electrical Power Research Institute of the United States of America (USEPRI) for the development and application of the RETRAN-3 Code for NPP's operational transient analysis.
  2. Agreement of co-operation between the Mexican Electric Research Institute and the USEPRI in the development and application of the R & R Workstation for NPP's probabilistic risk analysis applications.
  3. Agreement of co-operation between the Mexican Electric Research Institute and the USEPRI in the development and application of the MAAP-3 Code for NPP's severe accidents analysis.
  4. Agreement of co-operation between the Mexican Electric Research Institute and the USEPRI in the development and application of the CPM-3 Code for the Nuclear data library generation for advanced fuels.
  5. Agreement of co-operation between the Mexican Electric Research Institute and the Rensselear Polytechnic Institute of the United States for the development and application of the April Code for NPP's severe accidents analysis.
  6. Agreement of co-operation between the Mexican Electric Research Institute and the Cuban Institute for Hydrography for the development of the Northwest Caribbean Sea Oceanographic Chart.

3.  NATIONAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

3.1.  Safety Authority and the Licensing Process

The licensing consists of two steps, the first one concludes with the granting of the "Construction Permit" and the second step with the "License for Commercial Operation". The process starts with the application to build a NPP, by the utility (in Mexico up to now there is a national owned company, called Federal Electricity Commission), presenting to the National Regulatory Body (National Commission on Nuclear Safety and Safeguards) the application itself and the preliminary studies of:

If these documents satisfy the scope required by CNSNS, the utility is required to present the technical information on the NPP to be built, this information includes the construction procedures and fundamental safety systems to cope with the operational transients and postulated accidents. This information is evaluated by the CNSNS's technical personnel and a set of questions is transmitted to the utility, before the pouring of any concrete at the site. During the Laguna Verde experience, three "Provisional Construction Permits" were granted to CFE before the so-called "Definitive Construction Permit" issue. This limited work authorization has been eliminated in the present procedure for future NPPs.

During the construction itself, the regulatory body inspects the construction of the NPP and has the legal authority to stop the work if the agreed standards are not fulfilled. After the evaluation of the documentation, the regulatory body can issue the "Technical Basis" to grant the construction permit, addressed to the Ministry of Energy, being this the authority allowed by nuclear law, to grant the permit.

At certain stage of the construction and before the start of the pre-operational test period, the utility is required to present to the regulatory body the technical information related with:

If these process documents are not clear enough in any technical subject, the regulatory body generates questions to clarify any topic. As a result of this process the regulatory body issues the following documents:

The technical basis to grant the operation license, is addressed to the Ministry of Energy, because according the nuclear law, this is the Authority who can grant this kind of documents.

After the fuel load the regulator remains to monitor the performance of the low power test period and any change of power (0 to 5%, 5 to 10%, 10 to 25%, 25 to 50%m 50 to 75% and 75 to 100%), the engineers of the national body review the test results and evaluate possible discrepancies between the acceptance criteria and test results.

3.2.  Main National Laws and Regulations in Nuclear Power

Essential legal texts regulating nuclear power in the country

Mechanisms in place for financing decommissioning and waste disposal

The mechanisms in force to finance decommissioning and radioactive waste management are the following:

The final disposal of radioactive wastes management is a responsibility of the State, in the case of wastes proceeding from LVNPP the Federal Electricity Commission will be in charge of financing its storage. For decommissioning, the State through CFE will be in charge of financing this process.

4.  CURRENT ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENTS ON NUCLEAR POWER

4.1.  Energy Policy

Nuclear power stations are a proven alternative in Mexico, as demonstrated by the high availability, reliability and safety indicators at Laguna Verde. It is also a realistic option to comply with environmental requirements that are anticipated to be stricter in the future. However, there are no future plans for development of new nuclear facilities in the short term due to the high initial investments required which at the moment are not competitive with those of plants based on natural gas.

The Ministry of Energy is responsible for nuclear fuel cycle policy and operations, and can by law authorize some of these responsibilities to public entities such as the federal electricity commission (CFE) and the national nuclear research institute (ININ).

CFE has been authorized by the Ministry of Energy to negotiate uranium stock purchases, uranium enrichment and fuel fabrication contracts.

An interim waste repository managed by ININ collects all low and intermediate level radioactive wastes produced in medical, industrial and other radioisotope applications. This repository will be replaced by a permanent one in the future. Another interim low and intermediate level radioactive waste repository is operated by the Laguna Verde Plant to handle wastes coming from the station.

Spent nuclear fuel from the Laguna Verde Plant is being stored in the reactor's pools, which have been re-racked to increase the original capacity in order to accommodate all the spent fuel that the reactors will produce during their expected lifetime. This solution gives CFE the time needed to study all possibilities before adopting a definitive solution, depending on future developments regarding the final disposal of high-level radioactive wastes.

 

REFERENCES

[1]

Crónica del Gobierno de Carlos Salinas de Gortari, Síntesis e Indice Temático, Primera Edición, Presidencia de la República, Unidad de la Crónica Presidencial, Editorial Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, D.F.

[2]

El Sector Energético en México, Edición 1994, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, México, D.F., 1994, 295 p.p.

[3]

Balance Nacional de Energía 1993, Secretaría de Energía, Minas e Industria Paraestatal, México, D.F., 1994, 72 p.p.

[4]

Informe de Labores, 1993-1994, Petróleos Mexicanos, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 146 p.p.

[5]

Informe de Labores, 1993-1994, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 64 p.p.

[6]

Informe de Labores, 1993-1994, Secretaría de Energía, Minas e Industria Paraestatal, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 95 p.p.

[7]

Informe de Labores, 1993-1994, Luz y Fuerza del Centro, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 63 p.p.

[8]

Informe de Labores, 1993-1994, Comisión Federal de Electricidad, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 124 p.p.

[9]

Informe de Labores, 1993-1994, Instituto de Investigaciones Eléctricas, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 75 p.p.

[10]

Informe de Labores, 1993-1994, Secretaría de Gobernación, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 124 p.p.

[11]

Informe deLabores, 1993-1994, Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Talleres Gráficos de México, México, D.F., 1994, 90 p.p.

[12]

Avance de Información Económico Producto Interno Bruto Nominal Trimestral, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, México, D.F., 1994.

[13]

Estados Unidos Mexicanos Perfil Sociodemográfico, XI Congreso General de Población y Vivienda, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Garza, Gustavo y Rivera, Salvador.

[14]

Dinámica macroeconómica de las ciudades en México, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática y Colegio de México, México, D.F., 120 p.p.

[15]

Agreements Registerd with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Eleventh Edition, Legal Series N1 3, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1993, 278 p.p.

[16]

Data & Statistics/The World Bank, www.worldbank.org/data.

[17]

IAEA Energy and Economic Data Base (EEDB).

[18]

IAEA Power Reactor Information System (PRIS).

 

Appendix 1

INTERNATIONAL, MULTILATERAL AND BILATERAL AGREEMENTS

AGREEMENTS WITH THE IAEA

bullet NPT and Tlatelolco related safeguards agreement. INFCIRC No: 197

Entry into force:

14 September 1973

bullet Additional Protocol

Not signed

 

bullet Improved procedures for designation of safeguards inspectors

Accepted:

27 February 1989

bullet Supplementary agreement on provision of technical assistance by the IAEA

Entry into force:

4 June 1981

bullet ARCAL
New ARCAL Agreement

Entry into force:
Ratification:

April 1988
7 August 2000

bullet Agreement on the privileges and immunities of the IAEA

Entry into force:

19 October 1983

OTHER RELEVANT INTERNATIONAL TREATIES

bullet NPT

Entry into force:

21 January 1969

bullet Tlatelolco

Entry into force:

20 September 1967

bullet Convention on the physical protection of nuclear material

Entry into force:

4 May 1988

bullet Convention on early notification of nuclear accidents

Entry into force:

10 June 1988

bullet Convention on assistance in the caseof a nuclear accident or radiological emergency

Entry into force:

10 June 1988

bullet Vienna convention on civil liability for nuclear damage

Entry into force:

25 July 1989

bullet Joint Protocol

Non-Party

 

bullet Protocol to amend the Vienna convention on civil liability for nuclear damage

Not signed

 

bullet Convention on nuclear safety

Entry into force:

24 October 1996

bullet Convention on supplementary compensation for nuclear damage

Not signed

 

bullet Joint convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management

Not signed

 

bullet ZANGGER Committee

Non-member

 

bullet Nuclear export guidelines

Not Adopted

 

bullet Acceptance of NUSS

Summary: Codes should be used codes as guidelines in preparation and application of national requirements. Mexican nuclear safety legislation is in conformity with codes

11 April 1990

MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS

bullet Standard agreement concerning technical assistance to Mexico

Entry into force:
Parties:
- United Nations Organization (ONU).
- International Labour Organization (ILO).
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO).
- United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
- World Health Organization (WHO).
- International Telecommunications Union (ITU).
- World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
- Universal Postal Union (UPU).

23 July 1963

bullet Transfer of enriched uranium for a research reactor
Parties: Mexico, USA, IAEA

Entry into force:

18 December 1963

bullet Lease of source material for a subcritical assembly
Parties: Mexico, USA, IAEA

Entry into force:

20 June 1966

bullet Transfer of a training reactor and enriched uranium
Parties: Mexico, Germany, IAEA

Entry into force:

21 December 1971

bullet Second supply agreement for transferof enriched uranium for a research reactor
Parties: Mexico, USA, IAEA

Entry into force:

4 October 1972

bullet Supply of uranium enrichment services
Parties: Mexico, USA, IAEA

Entry into force:

12 February 1974

bullet Second supply agreement for supply of uranium enrichment services for a second reactor unit
Parties: Mexico, USA, IAEA

Entry into force:

14 June 1974

bullet Transfer of title to natural uranium
Parties: Mexico, USA, IAEA

Entry into force:

23 May 1989

bullet Plan of operation for a UN Special Fund project in Latin America (Eradication of Mediterranean Fruit Fly).
Parties: Mexico, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, UN Special Fund, IAEA

Entry into force:

29 July 1965

bullet Plan of operation for a UNDP project in Latin America, Amendment N1 1.
Parties: Mexico, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, UN Special Fund, IAEA

Entry into force:

31 July 1968

bullet Preliminary study of a nuclear electric power and desalting plant.
Parties: Mexico, USA, IAEA

Entry into force:

7 October 1965

bullet Agreement concerning provision of a dose assurance service by IAEA to irradiation facilities in its Members States (Exchange of letters).

Entry into force:
Parties:
Mexico, India, Syria, Argentina, Philippines, Malaysia, Belgium, Chile, Switzerland, Egypt, Hungary, Thailand, South Africa, Korea, Republic of, Algeria, Netherlands,Lebanon, Singapore, Denmark, Yugoslavia, Brazil, China.

18 September 1985

BILATERAL AGREEMENTS

bullet Agreement between the Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of Australia concerning co-operation in peaceful uses of nuclear energy and the transfer of nuclear material. Signed on 28 February, 1992, entered into force 1 Oct 1992.

bullet Agreement between the Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of Canada for Co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Signed in 16 November, 1994, entered into force on 9 May 1995.

 

Appendix 2

DIRECTORY OF THE MAIN ORGANIZATIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND COMPANIES INVOLVED IN NUCLEAR POWER RELATED ACTIVITIES

NATIONAL ENERGY AUTHORITIES

Ministry of Energy (SE)
Av. Insurgentes Sur N1 552
Col. Roma Sur
México, D.F.

Tel: +525-564-97-56
Fax: +525-574-10-10
http://www.energia.gob.mx/ingles/index.html

Federal Electricity Commission (CFE)
Salamanca N1 102
Col. Roma
México, D.F.

Tel: +525-229-54-90
Fax: +525-525-22-35

National Commission on Nuclear Safety and Safeguards (CNSNS)
Dr. Barrag an N1 779
Col. Narvarte
México, D.F.

Tel: +525-590-41-81
Fax: +525-590-61-03
Email: cnsns1@servidor.unam.mx

NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTES

National Institute of Nuclear Research (ININ)
Carretera Federal México-Toluca Km. 36.5
Salazar, Edo. de México

Tel: +525-521-94-02
Fax: +525-521-37-98
http://www.inin.mx

Electric Research Institute (IIE)
Av. Reforma N1 113
Col. Palmira
Temixco, Morelos

Tel: 91 (73) 18-38-11
Fax: 91 (73) 18-25-21
http://www.iie.org.mx

Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares (UNAM)

http://luthien.nuclecu.unam.mx

OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

Comisión Federal de Electricidad

http://www.cfe.gob.mx

Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (OPANAL)

http://www.opanal.org

Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo (IMP)

http://www.imp.mx

 

_______________________________________

1. The statistical tables in this profile have been updated with data as of August 2009 from Secretaria de Energia, Mexico, as well as IAEA databases, namely the Power Reactor Information System (PRIS) and Energy and Economic Data Bank (EEDB), and the World Bank's World Development Indicators (WDI).